Is it just me, or are bias presenters like James Whale just unreal in how they behave when interviewing the pro-Palestinians?
Here are a couple of examples where we can demonstrate that there is no pleasing presenters like James Whale. In the first interview, @23:10 a passionate pro-Palestinian guest, tries to make a point, demonstrating how he is being constantly cut off and not allowed to complete his points, because he is always being interrupted. James Whale then accuses him of being violent and even says to him, "why don't you just go away!". I find it ridiculous that he claimed that the guy was being violent, when he clearly wasn't. It's just clear to see that the guy is passionate and concerned about what's going on in Palestine.
In the following interview below, another educated pro-Palestine guest is interviewed. This guest is much more calm and collected. It is clear that he is trying to be as polite and as friendly as possible when he is being interviewed by James Whale. @10:43 James Whale accuses the guest of smirking and being rude when talking about a serious situation. When if we watch the interview in context, we can just see the guy smile, because he is very surprised by the responses from James Whale and Ash(James's side-kick). The guest has to then clarify to James, that he is smiling out of politeness and because he is trying to be nice.
It's as if you can't win with people like James Whale and Ash. If the guests are passionate, he accuses them of being violent and aggressive. While if they are calm and polite, he accuses them of smirking and mocking the situation in Palestine. I find it ridiculous and to be honest, it's just a tactic to make the guests they oppose look bad. I mean Ash is arguably even more rude than James, in the way he speaks to the pro-Palestinian guests. Fair enough, he is Jewish and he is no doubt on the side of Israel, but that doesn't mean he should be rude to the guests on the show.