Leaderboard

You would think that having lived in Nazi Germany as a Jew and having been persecuted by the Nazis in Germany, that his political actions would have been more empathetic. But alas, he turned out to be a war monger and his political decisions resulted in the millions of deaths of innocent people. Interestingly enough, he played for the youth team of Greuther Furth, before his family fled Germany. So he was a bit of a talented footballer in his youth, it's just a shame that he became an infamous politician in adulthood.

It's a recurring issue I need the server technicians to look into but by the time I can send a ticket to support it has already "fixed" itself.

What are you laughing at Stan? If there's one thing that everyone can agree on about the Nazis, is that the real problem was how woke they were.

Also done by Serb nationalists on the during Bosnian war and many Christian warlords in Africa. You've got a very selective reality perception. War crimes are far from being committed by groups you dissent with only.

Only if you're an outright Islamophobe.

Go tell that to Cambodia. Good riddance to bad rubbish.

It makes me laugh that around remembrance day you get pictures of absolute neanderthals wearing poppies but are emblazoned with swastika tattoos

THOSE BLOODY WOKE NAZIS. WITH THEIR IDEAS OF TOLERANCE TOWARDS PEOPLE OF DIFFERENT ETHNICITIES AND SEXUAL PREFERENCES. BLOODY FASCISTS. While ignoring the Nazis weren't tolerant of different ethnicities or gays/lgbt+

This is one the funniest things I think I've read on this forum. Also why the fuck would you care about "not wanting to live in a country where being English is seen as an issue?" Aren't you South African? Even if that were the case (spoiler alert - it isn't, hilarious claim though)... wouldn't you be fine in that situation? Seeing as you're not English? Also there's absolutely no debate on what it is fundamentally to be British - born in Britain or a British overseas territory or a citizen of a British country or British overseas territory? Ok then we all agree that you've got the fundamental aspects of being British. Not born in Britain or a British overseas territory or a citizen of these countries/territories? Ok, we all agree you've not got the fundamental aspects of being British. It's not some mysterious concept of Britishness - it's citizens of the UK, British Overseas Territories, and Crown dependencies.

It works now! Thanks again!

I had that issue as well, try entering onto TF365 via another link (premier league forum, general football, etc) and it should work.

The one thing Brexit achieved in terms of immigration is that France are now making even less effort to stop people jumping in the small boats to the shores of the UK than they were making when we were still in the EU with them because back then, there was a minimum amount of effort they had to be seen to make. I personally don't think immigration is a problem but those of us that are "left-leaning" and generally feel this way also have to admit that there is such a thing as "too much" immigration. I don't really think we've reached that point but I also won't pretend to know how much is too much. We obviously couldn't cope if a million people were arriving each month, for a silly example. The problem for me is that this debate is never had in good faith. Most of the people who shout the loudest about immigration and how it puts too much of a strain on the NHS or schools have another agenda. Usually they want low taxes either for selfish or ideological reasons. If we can blame immigration rather than a lack of government spending for long waiting lists and overflowing classrooms, then there's less pressure on the government to increase funding in these areas (which is what is actually needed) and therefore less need to raise taxes on the upper-middle class to super rich people. A lot of anti-immigration types like to use "look after our own" as some sort of attack line without acknowledging that if we reduced net migration to the UK to zero overnight, our public services would still be in dire straits and require a lot of investment. You don't really hear much from well-qualified academic types on the drawbacks of immigration or "too much" immigration and if you do, a bit of digging usually reveals that they're on the pay roll of some oddball think tank on Tufton Street who also contributed to Liz Truss' leadership campaign or something. Onto the Tories. They've spent the last few years since Covid on some real hair-brained schemes to be seen to deal with immigration without thinking about the political consequences when they don't actually follow through with some success. That barge thing and the Rwanda scheme have been a total waste of time and were at least partially designed to look cruel or "ruthless" because they think that appeals to their target voters but nobody seems to be buying it anymore. If they had spent that time working towards realistic and viable solutions to decrease net migration even by a little bit, then perhaps the people who, unlike me, think that's important, might have a bit more patience for the Tories now. One last thing and I know you haven't said it but I've always found the British dependence on the made up rule about "refugees are supposed to stay in the first safe country they reach" to be quite hysterical. If this was actually enforced then you'd just see Greece and Turkey being forced to harbour millions of refugees while France, Germany, the UK and the rest of Europe didn't lift a finger. Again, it's really hard to put any intellectual value in the anti-immigration argument when some of its acolytes rely on this as some sort of leg to stand on when it falls apart the second you point out that there is no such rule, and even if there was that would mean that the UK would never have to take any refugees ever unless they were coming from the Republic of Ireland or perhaps Iceland.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lord's_Resistance_Army lol have you ever tried googling for things?

Wouldn't it be novel if the people who have a problem with mass immigration actually paused and realised that 7 years after voting for Brexit and after over a decade of voting for the Tories because they'll be tough on immigration, that net migration has actually increased and that maybe the people who they ignored and wrote off as leftie Nazis or whatever I just read, who told everyone that Brexit wasn't the solution and that however much "Boris" seems like a good lad to go for a pint with (never really got it personally), making him prime minister would only make everyone's lives worse, might actually have had a point? Just a thought.

The old ones are good but dated for their time. Have to say that they had some of the nicest online gaming experience though and it was quite fun.

It's a shame that so many good people die young, and that piece of shit got to live to 100.

With MGS you're given the option to go all out or be ultra stealthy. What you choose really depends on how you want to play the game, my personal preference is stealth as it really does challenge you in some particular scenarios. The reason MGS3 ranks so high for me in the list is that you don't even need to kill the bosses and you can use CQC (close quarter combat) and a tranq-gun to take them all out. While this seems easy its far from it because that system requires you to master it throughout the game as you progress and some of the zones leave you scratching your head on how stealth should be used. It's really one of a kind and its closes comparison is probably Splinter Cell and Thief in some ways too. You get rewarded for being sneaky more so than being ultra combative which you can be. And yes you can sneak up and choke, tranq or kill someone in MGS.

Lmao https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/henry-kissinger-war-criminal-dead-1234804748/amp/

I couldn't give a fuck less about changing team names. As if that is the biggest problem in this country lol. For Washington and Cleveland it seemed like the right thing to do if people were genuinely upset about it. The travesty here was the new team names were so bad. The Guardians and the Commanders? I could eat some alphabet soup and shit out better names.

Plenty of goals in Game 71 and 72 and plenty of winners! Game 71's first goal was early in the 10th minute 1 point Game 72's first goal was also early, in the 11th minute: 3 points! 1 point 1 point Table after Game 72: I move up to 2nd with my 3rd Exact score so far, while @Devil-Dick Willie moves up to 9th with his first Exact. @Redcanuck and @JoshBRFC also improve their rankings, and @Tommy remains in 15th but adds one to his tally.

In terms of sneaking around, it's like stealth, but in a different way to the games you mentioned because of the type of games they all are. Uncharted is more of an action adventure game where stealth is mainly used as part of set pieces or just for stealth kills where possible (i.e. you've sneaked behind the enemy to kill them). They aren't stealth games where sneaking around like what @Mel81x mentioned is required. The Last of Us has more in the way of stealth and if you want a better comparator, it's closer to that than Uncharted. In this case, it's used in a survival horror sense as being stealthy in taking out the infected or killing other humans is better than all guns blazing, as you'll very quickly get overwhelmed and killed if there's too many. The Metal Gear games have mainly been around stealth and infiltration throughout, as again, while you can shoot enemies and the like, you won't last very long as enemies will hone in on you and basically take you out if you're spotted, especially as you had to be out of line of sight and, in the case of MGS3, be camouflaged well enough to avoid detection. That's not to say you don't use weapons or the like at all and you do need them to take out bosses and the like.