Spike

https://chaser.com.au/general-news/bruce-lehrmann-achieves-goal-of-losing-title-of-alleged-rapist/ Fat boy got what was coming

I genuinely don’t remember that one

I’m not forcing any perspective you keep reinforcing it post after post You can’t even say Hamas killed all those people, hahaha

No this isn’t about ‘deserved’. You can’t even keep this discussion straight at all, you can’t even answer ‘Is it morally acceptable for Hamas to kill civilians in their struggle for self-determination?’ but constantly preach the moral righteousness of the cause by stating weird shit like ‘slave rebellion’, and massively criticising Israel for killing citizens, You’re scared to admit Hamas is wrong to have killed all those people but you’re own cognitive dissonance can’t handle that so you blame Israel, removing all agency from Hamas. You are incapable of seeing Hamas as an independent community of people, see them only as a reactionary force to Israel, they don’t act, they react. Hamas chose to kill civilians so in your unconditional support stop beating around the damn bush and admit you are okay with Hamas doing it, you won’t criticise their actions, instead hiding behind words like ‘innocents’, ‘slave rebellion’, ‘nazi Israel’, so its okay for them to kill non-innocents? Who are non-innocents? People you feel like you can get away saying it is okay to kill? But it is of course is the oppressors fault, so that makes it okay for Hamas to kill civil- I mean innocents, right?

You are saying that it is okay by comparing it to a slave rebellion, that is; giving them the moral justification to pursue their self determination through any means necessary. You are also saying that Hamas is absolved of their own agency as they are the oppressed, and that any civilian death’s are caused by Israel. If you believe that the oppressed have moral justification for any means necessary at achieving their own self determination just admit it, otherwise everything you say is just cowardly hypocrisy.

So it's okay when Hamas kills civilians.

So when Hamas bombed that music festival it was different?

I don’t understand this ’human shield’ concept. Military bases are staffed by humans, but they aren’t considered human shields because of civilian/military dichotomy? So military personal whether they be officers or janitors are morally inferior as humans?

Punishing Israel just punishes the people that live there, that isn't a solution to any problem.

Okay, first decision is to make a copper statue of me lifting every world cup for Australia while kicking King Charles in the arse

Who gets what

Muad’Dib is about to emerge from the desert with his third eye awakened and find the golden path to the unification of the holy lands. It’s as simple as that you fucken dunces

Name these potential strong leaders

Fucken tell him, dadash. This king won’t be wrong, so true

All the fucked and cooked cunts thinks this is a good time to fucken sook about gun control and how mass murders still happen.

@Tommy

That’s just cruel

WW2 teaches people that there are goodies and baddies in wars.

I have a friend that conditionally supports Hamas as he states they are the only means that the Palestinian people have for self-determination whether just or not, and I tell him I have no support for Hamas as I don’t believe a boot of any colour on someone’s neck is positive, nor do I buy into the cope of ‘he is a monster, but he is our monster’. I have no support from Israel either, as they cultivated this situation into a war and admittedly so, they are the power brokers in this war all terms and conditions are determined through them. I support both the people of Israel and Palestine not having to suffer through a war that ultimately serves no purpose but to strengthen the imperial goals of the power holders in Israel and abroad, they don’t suffer from their ivory towers.

You’re telling me you think it’s a bad idea for regional powerhouses to use foreign military assets to commit atrocities?

https://www.cnn.com/australia/live-news/sydney-mall-attack-updates-intl/index.html

It’s just an islamophobia trope, the people that say shit like ‘Iranians are converting to Christianity’ are just saying that to give their own religion moral superiority and to give a justification to whatever anti-Islam ideals they hold. Even I know that Christianity is so minor in the history of Iran that I wouldn’t be surprised of there are more Mazdayasnas and that is nearly a dead religion. Let’s go for it, lets get some secular Zoroastrians, I’m on board with big bonfires and sky burials, that’s metal as fuck - the sister rooting can stay with the Sassanids though.

The only people that think there are millions of Christians in Iran are cooked youtubers and their viewers.

I love the dichotomy of wrestling fans, those that eat everything up, and those that just sit at home hating on everything because they have diabetes or some shit, both so cringe yet so different.

I really don’t care for this sort of shit. Anyone that thinks food is a static idea that can’t or shouldn’t change with the people, ingredients, location, and times is just a food fascist masturbating to themselves on the idea of what something ‘should be’, it’s the same as people that bully or shame food based on their class, culture, or religion. Yeah, American cafes butcher the flat white coffee, who gives a shit? It’s all just a variation, extrapolation, riff, modification of something else. You want food purity? Go eat some unprocessed grains and a hunk or burnt meat in a cave. I do agree it sucks paying money for a shitty facsimile.