OrangeKhrush

Political discourse is hardly ever an agreement on any/everything but rather a compomise on view points. Those that refuse to participate or block/censor it tend to be people under the "progressive banner" who hate being disagreed on or questioned then use threat to force their view points on others. We have a certain person who talks about cultists yet the clear and obvious examples of when you don't fit in with the cult you get attacked is Ana Kasperian having an ephiphany moment and the TYT fanbase went absolutely full raging mental on her on twitter and the TYT. We live in a society where "freedom of thought" and the expression of that is constrained to a pigeon hole and depending on which drawer you opinion espouses determines whether or not you are acceptable for this authoritarian standard. Discourse is important as is disagreement, if people cant handle that then they are to far gone.

My first point was more to do with one element in current US politics where vested interests by politicians in their paid backers has grossly violated principals of democracy. Both sides of the aisle are backed by the same people in big tech, big pharma, military arms manufacturing, banking and financial, energy companies. The example I was referring to was predominantly down to the COVID 19 period when government and their paid media houses would have people with proven ties that were not disclosed go on air and view a biased view point in which to create mass hysteria to the benefits of these corporates. There was also that body created to determine "truth" which ultimately failed but it was the very first attempt by a US government to determine what is "truth". Never has a more brazen attempt been made in the US for government to control narrative and is a fundamental breach in democratic values. More information keeps coming to light about the corroboration between government and their corporate backers and that the science was flawed at best and that the consequence is a rise of cardio and respiratory problems as well as offset conditions like diabetes through forced vaccine mandates. The use of political force to compel people to take the vaccine was a throwback to draconian style governance. in regard to point 2. From a decentralized government point, there needs to be a clear safeguard from corporate and government becoming one and the same, the government is there to regulate the private sector not act in the interest of the well paying benefactors. One cannot act in both capacities without a clear bias. A politician needs to act bonafides to the interests of the electorate, the people elect them to represent their interests, similarly a director has a fiduciary duty to act in the interests of the business. Therefore there can never be co-existence between the two principals, you cannot act in both interests without breaching one. Banning corporate funding would be a positive step to restoring accountability in government. In regard to point 3. As a practicing attorney in the labour field, I will never advocate for retraction of employee interests only for the better relationship and equal bargaining power between employer and employee. The point I was making was this, in South Africa which is a very progressive and advanced in labour laws, businesses are governed under various legislation such as; The Companies Act, Competitions Act, Income Tax Act, Labour Relations Act, Employment Equity Act, Basic Conditions of Employment Act, National Minimum Wage Act, Insolvency Act as well as being informed by prevailing 'Common Law which derives from English Law of torts and Roman Dutch Law as well as The Constitution. This leaves the private sector free from Government control, but constrained by Legislation to avoid gross abuse of power. As for the final, I don't think the US and NATO have clean hands in this conflict and I think it is by design because war is profit and politicians are tied into military arms companies. This conflict could have been stopped but the interest is in propagating tax payer money for war. The US budget goes mostly to making weapons of war instead of to say, veterans and current servicemen and woman who are living in near poverty or I don't know increasing law enforcement, improving education and stuff that is generally not profitable to a politician. Instead you have MSNBC, FOX et al bringing on people without disclosing their ties to Lockheed Martin, Raythoen and other arms companies, or failing to disclose their affiliations and allowing these people to advocate for war. This war could have been stopped but between money and a green jumpsuit apparatus wearing warmonger acting like Oliver Twist and asking for more weapons, a real leader which biden is not would have ended this conflict a long time ago and maybe copped a bullet by the establishment, because the agenda is war and sadly it is entrenched into both sides of the aisles, anyone that talks out about it is attacked, villainized and censored. In finality, while I don't agree on everything RFK advocates for, on balance he seems to tick more boxes than my other preferred candidates.

The issue now comes down to a civil rights case, the victims families will probably pursue legal action against oceangate, if not the state itself. It is the only submersible that has ever imploded in nearly a century of submersible dives, the first was in the early 1930's. This disaster needs to be learned from and standards need to be enforced to ensure maverick approaches and blatant disregard for safety is not a precedent set by oceangate.

The new information out recently brings to light how Stockton Rush bypassed legislation pertaining to civilian transportation. The sub was never certified and it was passed off as an exploratory and experimental vessel and the passengers were titled as mission specialists. The laws on scientific vs civilian vessels differ. That being said there is investigations ongoing about how it was deliberately bypassing regulatory standards under false pretenses. Stockton Rush did seem like a ego maniac from what people in the industry who worked with him or on advisory boards had mentioned that he had no regard for regulatory standards or anyone telling him how to do things. The hubris in his video is not that different to White Star line dubbing the titanic unsinkable and yet both over a century apart share the same resting ground.

that 1bn toy isn't going to pay for itself

1) they are older articles 2) non are by engineers or attorneys 3) new information since then has come to light ie: the sub failed it's certification and did not have the paperwork necessary. what people are struggling to get is that the vessel was built in America, it needed to pass regulatory standards in engineering in order to pass safety requirements. jurisdiction on international waters is not absolute either, jurisdiction always resorts back to the country the vessel was registered on eg: if a ship registered as American strikes a reef and leaks oil, America has jurisdiction in legal action against the shipping company. if a murder is committed on same example, then America has jurisdiction to prosecute even if it was over international waters. if the ship was in territorial waters of another country then there is dual jurisdiction. news in yesterday is that Canada are looking into possible legal action for regulatory violations.

Canada is also looking into regulatory breaches and falsified information by oceangate. I'm so glad this place is full of experts on everything. maybe we can tell car manufacturers they don't have to meet regulatory standards because reasons. we are at the point where cookies must crumble and culpability must be found.

I heard a story that saying donnarumma in Milan will get you beat up.

yes there were, the submersible failed it's pressure test at 3000m give or take, to get around the regulations they argued the "pushing the boundaries" arguement or "voyage for science" rhetoric. the sub is a us registered vehicle and needs to comply with safety requirements in accordance with maritime laws and passenger laws. I have a PPL and CPL with a turbojet type rating, the red tape to even take a family member on a joy ride is rigorous, I doubt maritime is different as a friend owns a catermaran passager vessel rated for sea tours and the inspections are done every month, fines for any structural fault. passengers also have to sign indemnity which is attached to a passenger manifest. the more info is coming out the more dubious it gets

a good video, not the only one covering the full history of ocean gate and it's now doomed to disaster reputation. lots of red flags and again I ask how regulations were bypassed

The real pandemic in America, the one that gets swept under the rug. Opiod drugs where Heroine actually looks good in comparison. the source of the drug trade is obvious, and because of it, it doesn't get air time.

From a political ideological stand point Robert F Kennedy is probably my favourite candidate assumumg talk us not cheap. an ideal candidate for me would be. 1) decentralised government. the government should not be arbiters of truth, when government controls mindthink it is an abuse of the doctrine of separation of powers and tends towards totalitarianism. censorship should be the discretion of the courts to determine where speech falls outside protected speech. 2) banning corporate/politics overlapping, if a person is a director or shareholder they cannot be a politician and visa versa. 3) regulation of the private sector under corporate and labour laws. 4) No wars or conflicts

you might get a kabbab for Deli Alli, if lucky

all vessels are registered somewhere. Since it is also a tourist vessel it has to pass safety requirements. it was registered in the US. International waters don't mean the ship/vessel has no nationality or place of registration.

he fired a few who questioned things. what really needs to be answered is who certified this hardware store capsule for a deep dive. it is not like you can just go forth under the sea, it requires red tape and some didn't do their job.

did you not see the interview with the owner

with the titan wreckage recovered, we will learn that the boring white guys with 30-40 years experience were right all along and the submersible should never have been cleared for beyond 2000m, less than half the titanic depth. what we do know is the sub imploded hours after its dive started and that it was due to reaching is maximum crush depth. what I want to know is how this death trap got signed off for a titanic dive. smells like corruption at play. Do the diversity hires also face criminal prosecution for lying about the capabilities. this entire operation is suspicious

that's not factually true, man United and real Madrid make far more money

Proving the point

you say let's not bicker about semantics but then big down on semantics. I don't watch any mainstream media particularly American or BBC and Sky as they are all mouthpieces for the people that fund them who ironically are arms manufacturers, drug companies who own politicians and media on both sides. we get bogged down with cultural rifts to distract people from what is really happening. I like watching Russell Brand and Tuckers new podcast because people who speak out about the situation and get the most attacked are more likely telling the truth. nobody gets upset about MSNBC hosts rampant racism or "reporting" because its par for the course shilling. we need a decentralised government where politicians are barred from being shareholders and directors in bodies they are supposed to regulate. we also need a return to discourse and acceptance that there are different ideologies and that compromise must be made for the betterment of everyone equally.

so it looks like America was planning to invade Iran, I can see why they want that kept quiet.

Australian cricketer. Ended his career with a 99.9 batting average

Bayern could sell some fringe players like Sabitzer or possibly move Mane to get extra cash

Bayern will need to get it closer to 85m to possibly get it done

it will be huge for bayern. Spurs may sell him cheaper to a club out of the league. they may as well cash in for Kane and son. 67m for son from Saudi Arabia is a one time opportunity for an aging forward. 75m pounds or so for Kane is better than 0 in 6 months.