Jump to content
talkfootball365
  • Welcome to talkfootball365!

    The better place to talk football.

Honey Honey

Administrator
  • Posts

    12,330
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    65

Everything posted by Honey Honey

  1. Doesn't he only have 35 of 257 lower chamber seats and 7 of 73 senate seats or is that not right? @Goku de la Boca @Cicero Is this not a pointless Presidency rather than a radical one, what do you hear on your end?
  2. His economics is from the same decade as his haircut.
  3. He's not in jail he has a suspended sentence for hacking in Portugal. It doesn't really matter though. Man City have been charged. You don't get charged if the evidence isn't there. Chelsea are being investigated. They're yet to be charged.
  4. Which other clubs have broken the 3 year rule? Aston Villa came close but as far as I'm aware ended OK. Forest have already started recalibration. Man City and Chelsea are under investigation for fraud, very different, far more serious and complex. Everton are a lesson to anyone who tries to taks a punt at bettering themselves. Basically, the rule is £105m on paper, but in practice if you dare to get up to £105m from a mid table position you are gambling. Thats the lesson here. So really the unwritten rule is more like £50m-£75m for the mid table clubs. The saddest part in all of this is Everton failed. They didn't even manage to make a good enough team to progress. They've basically had to sell good players sending them further back than where they started from, isn't that enough of a price to pay? Now they're getting a points deduction as well it is kicking a man when he's down. You can argue rules are rules, but I do think it should be weighted by the advantage you gave yourself. And no, Leeds and Burnley didn't get relegated because of Everton overspending, quite the opposite, Everton were only at Leeds and Burnleys level in the first place because their spending failed and they then had to sell sell sell. Where does it end? Everton pay everyone below them in the pyramid until they're in the conference?
  5. Surely number 2 wouldn't work as banks will lend you more if you earn more or have more equity. Therein lies the real source of the problem. As long the banks keep printing it's not going to flatline for people to catch up from their salaries.
  6. It's plum roulette with the ones you get at the supermarket. You never know until you bite into it whether it is off or not.
  7. Imagine being so frightened that Newcastle might have Ruben Neves on the bench that you have to bring in an emergency temporary rule to stop it Can't even wait to write the full rule, Ruben Neves coming on for Longstaff with 10 minutes to go is frightening.
  8. It's claimed he wasn't demoted. Refs have to do a certain amount of championship games and this was just one of his.
  9. I'm not sure it is that weird. They have no power to enforce a couple of people to not talk about it, but if whomever made the calls has a good relationship with who they called they may have been asking a favour or for some moral support. That is standard in press relationships, journos often have to grease people up to get access, but it doesn't help not knowing who the two are.
  10. In defence and criticism of Ten Hag the performances match the line up.
  11. Livramento in the form he's in has to start. Him or Trippier can go left back.
  12. Clicked the Richard Keys link, not sure why, but I did, closed it off within a paragraph as he started talking about "free speech", an alt right dog whistle these days and you just know that's exactly where he's got it from. When Richard Keys is in your corner saying you don't need to be professional I think as a rule of thumb you probably should do the opposite.
  13. The banner was of the PSG owner and Gianni Infantino and a link to a website protesting the Champions league reforms.
  14. I don't enjoy it any more so I drop off for a while every now and then. I'm not sure a Newcastle fan can co-mingle with other fans online and enjoy it anymore. It is what it is.
  15. If you could turn back time you would have started our strongest available 11 possible. Still, Milan currently losing which would guarantee that the last game, home to them, will have something on it. Absolutely would have taken that when the draw was made.
  16. Livramento and Joelinton on the wings as Almiron and Gordon are rested.
  17. Trippier will move to left back at first. Livramento right back. If it doesn't work then Hall will come in. See it as an opportunity to progress as opposed to a major set back.
  18. We've only got 13 fit outfield players. I think we'll lose 3-1.
  19. I know a few who've bought tickets in the home end for >£200 on ticket sites, or is it a "neutral" no colours section or something?
  20. It does the complete opposite in my view. It undermines pressure because the VAR decision on the goal is deemed as correct by the main media figures who arent ex Arsenal. There's insufficient evidence for clear and obvious error. If there is a time for a statement this absolutely isn't it unless it was a demand for better tech. Arsenal have basically made statements worthless. Though statements are massively cringe in the first place, a weird new culture.
  21. It is a blow to us over the course of the season. If fully fit midfield we should be good enough for top 6 without him.
×
×
  • Create New...