God is Haaland

...and then Darren Grimes completed 18 holes with just 34 strikes.

*3rd

19th Feb, 2016

ikr This is from the 19th of June 2016(ie: 4 days before the vote). EDIT: Actually that was June the 26th 2016 - 3 days after vote and most importantly AFTER LEAVE ADMITTED THE BUS WAS A LIE. Btw love the wording, @Fairy In Boots.

Ahem https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_24_Hours_of_Le_Mans_winners#Constructors Search for Porsche 962 and 956.

I agree 100%. However "Norf" sounds incredibly dull, "midlands" doesn't.

Last two pages summed up:

What happened one year after Klopp joined Liverpool? Brexit

https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/48491809 Tom Werner is a true believer now.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TzYVvIASt_c U19 Champions!

Hello and welcome back, mate.

Initially i was considering reading one of his books, too, because he's a mathematician and I was interested in mathematical models he might have used. But then he started claiming that 90% of the European financial aids Greece received went straight to German banks - a claim that was parroted by two notorious anti-EU members on tff btw. Later he had to admit that the total fraction of aids that went to banks in general was actually just about a third. I take your post as a confirmation to my conclusion that Y. Varoufakis lacks the intellectual integrity to produce anything that's worth my time and money.

My condolences

You are now on 88 points - more than ever before - but you're not going to win the league.

@SirBalon, so what did El Pais write about "El Juli"?

Schumacher didn't get punished for allegedly using TC, Benetton got punished for removing a fuel filter, which - by the way - was done by many other teams. When the stewards investigated the race starts in question, they discovered that MSC's start was way too slow for TC and that everyone around him had messed up, which is why he was able to pull away.

Are you an MP or did you mean to write "our MPs"?

Like clockwork.

You challenged a strawman. "The EEA members don't want the UK to join" is a slightly ambigious statement. You chose to interprete it as "All EEA members don't want the UK to join", but what was actually meant was "The EEA members as a group don't want the UK to join" which should have been clear after my consequetive post, because it's the only interpretation consistent with my consequetive post. But you chose to ignore it. Apparently information becomes "irrelevant" as soon as it contradicts your assumption.

Ignoring all but the very first sentence from my post doesn't make you right. And I doubt you even know what my notion is.

You didn't debunk it, you addressed it. In the case of Norway the economical benefits might outweigh the economical and legislative drawbacks, because the UK is Norway's biggest trading partner. However, in order to join the EEA all members have to agree. Btw if you're dependent on Norway, you can forget reclaiming any fishing rights.

The EEA member don't want the UK to join, because it would be diametrically opposed to their interests.