Danny 2,206 Posted January 5, 2021 Share Posted January 5, 2021 1 minute ago, N U F C said: Brentford have done okay but I wouldn't go as far as saying they've been the better side. No it’s been fairly even second half Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danny 2,206 Posted January 5, 2021 Share Posted January 5, 2021 Relaxing with a Terry’s hot chocolate orange in solidarity for our fallen soldiers who are on the receiving on of some pretty cut and dry corruption from Levy and Riley Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danny 2,206 Posted January 5, 2021 Share Posted January 5, 2021 Regullion should be in prison atm surely? The super spreader, endangering the lives of honest footballers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrator Stan 18,383 Posted January 5, 2021 Author Administrator Share Posted January 5, 2021 Hahaha what is that defending. All Spurs defence static. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danny 2,206 Posted January 5, 2021 Share Posted January 5, 2021 Clearly can’t see where the defenders foot ends, more corruption from Levy and co Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrator Stan 18,383 Posted January 5, 2021 Author Administrator Share Posted January 5, 2021 Oh wait, ruled out by VAR. Spurs' static-ness just about pays off... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danny 2,206 Posted January 5, 2021 Share Posted January 5, 2021 Offside by a knee cap it is what it is. Aurier feigning injury as he tried to foul Jensen, Mourinho football in effect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrator Stan 18,383 Posted January 5, 2021 Author Administrator Share Posted January 5, 2021 Game over. Son scores. Too quick for Brentford defence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danny 2,206 Posted January 5, 2021 Share Posted January 5, 2021 The difference a kneecap can make, no real advantage gained from it but they’re the rules. Good goal from Spurs, you know that’s going in as soon as Son gets in on goal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick 2,276 Posted January 5, 2021 Share Posted January 5, 2021 Fuck sake Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrator Stan 18,383 Posted January 5, 2021 Author Administrator Share Posted January 5, 2021 Just now, Danny said: The difference a kneecap can make, no real advantage gained from it but they’re the rules. Good goal from Spurs, you know that’s going in as soon as Son gets in on goal I don't get how it can be determined where the defenders foot is. Usually back VAR but not sure how conclusive that can be considering the foot can't be seen behind Toney's knee? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danny 2,206 Posted January 5, 2021 Share Posted January 5, 2021 Just now, Stan said: I don't get how it can be determined where the defenders foot is. Usually back VAR but not sure how conclusive that can be considering the foot can't be seen behind Toney's knee? Look I was going to write that but I thought I was already being OTT with my other posts. But completely, VAR can not determine where his foot ends so cannot disallow it. But here we are Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subscriber Storts+ 2,424 Posted January 5, 2021 Subscriber Share Posted January 5, 2021 Josh Dasilva absolute scum. Nasty side Brentford Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrator Stan 18,383 Posted January 5, 2021 Author Administrator Share Posted January 5, 2021 Nasty tackle that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick 2,276 Posted January 5, 2021 Share Posted January 5, 2021 That’s a cunts tackle Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danny 2,206 Posted January 5, 2021 Share Posted January 5, 2021 Dasilva has tried to hook the ball back which is why the right foot has come up. No intention to land anything on Hojberg just an accident Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subscriber Storts+ 2,424 Posted January 5, 2021 Subscriber Share Posted January 5, 2021 That injury on Hojbjerg is horrific - horror tackle and looks pretty deliberate too. What a coward Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subscriber Storts+ 2,424 Posted January 5, 2021 Subscriber Share Posted January 5, 2021 Just now, Danny said: Dasilva’s clearly lost his footing trying to hold onto the ball there, red card. Dasilva has tried to hook the ball back which is why the right foot has come up. No intention to land anything on Hojberg just an accident Behave. That’s a shocker with intent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrator Stan 18,383 Posted January 5, 2021 Author Administrator Share Posted January 5, 2021 Just now, Danny said: Dasilva has tried to hook the ball back which is why the right foot has come up. No intention to land anything on Hojberg just an accident Can't really defend that mate, whatever he's trying to do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick 2,276 Posted January 5, 2021 Share Posted January 5, 2021 Just now, Danny said: Dasilva’s clearly lost his footing trying to hold onto the ball there, red card. Dasilva has tried to hook the ball back which is why the right foot has come up. No intention to land anything on Hojberg just an accident Nah, not having that. His leg is in such an unnatural position, there’s literally no reason for him to put his foot there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danny 2,206 Posted January 5, 2021 Share Posted January 5, 2021 Just now, Storts said: Behave. That’s a shocker with intent. No intent at all, watch what he’s doing, is trying to play the ball by dragging the ball back which meant he raised his right foot. He wasn’t even trying to make a tackle. But it was bad and deserved a red Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danny 2,206 Posted January 5, 2021 Share Posted January 5, 2021 Just now, Stan said: Can't really defend that mate, whatever he's trying to do. Agreed he should be off, but talk of scum and whatever else is off the mark. It was an accident in his part to land on Hojberg like that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrator Stan 18,383 Posted January 5, 2021 Author Administrator Share Posted January 5, 2021 Just now, Danny said: No intent at all, watch what he’s doing, is trying to play the ball by dragging the ball back which meant he raised his right foot. He wasn’t even trying to make a tackle. But it was bad and deserved a red You can do that without putting your foot in to the other player's shin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subscriber Storts+ 2,424 Posted January 5, 2021 Subscriber Share Posted January 5, 2021 These officials have been awful too. Missed two red cards and an offside goal. Not usually thankful for it but VAR done well today Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danny 2,206 Posted January 5, 2021 Share Posted January 5, 2021 1 minute ago, Rick said: Nah, not having that. His leg is in such an unnatural position, there’s literally no reason for him to put his foot there. There is. He has raised his foot so his other foot can drag the ball back underneath it. There is no need for him to try and foul Hojberg as he already had the ball, was just a wreck less action that could have been much worse. But no intent Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.