Jump to content
talkfootball365
  • Welcome to talkfootball365!

    The better place to talk football.

Lewandowski or Kane? (Gerrard Insecurity Thread)


football forum

Who is the better forward?  

31 members have voted

  1. 1. Who is the better forward?

    • Lewandowski
      27
    • Kane
      4


Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Dr. Gonzo said:

That’s not a pay cut?

A pay cut is getting less than you were paid before?

Idk why this is still going.

Kane is not as good as Lewa, Gerrard was better than Lampard but people might feel different & that one was certainly a closer debate than the one in this thread. It’s also been done a billion times on the internet.

Let's take a player who makes 200K, he get's offered 400K to go to another club, he turns that club down and ends up getting 300K at the club he wanted to stay with.

Yes it's not technically a cut in pay, but he has taken less money to stay where he wants though.

And btw I am as confused as anyone why this is still going on? It started off about Lewandowski and Kane, highjacked by DDW and Spike, had it been hijacked by a newbie it would have been closed long ago mate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 185
  • Created
  • Last Reply
4 minutes ago, Scouse_Mouse said:

Let's take a player who makes 200K, he get's offered 400K to go to another club, he turns that club down and ends up getting 300K at the club he wanted to stay with.

Yes it's not technically a cut in pay, but he has taken less money to stay where he wants though.

And btw I am as confused as anyone why this is still going on? It started off about Lewandowski and Kane, highjacked by DDW and Spike, had it been hijacked by a newbie it would have been closed long ago mate.

I'd replace "technically" with "not".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Spike said:

You don’t seem to get that it’s really fucking easy to be loyal with his paycheque. There is less difference between 100,000 p/w and 200,000 than 500 and 1000

fucking loyalty ain’t defined by those millions. If he was a Sheffield boy at Wednesday with the same love for the club as you think he has for Liverpool, he wouldn’t have stayed when someone came knocking.

 

 

Clearly you don't have much of a clue about loyalty mate, google Mathew Le Tissier, great player, he could have made more money playing for us or manu, he chose to stay loyal to Southampton for less money and zilch in the trophy cabinet.

It happens.:coffee:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator
39 minutes ago, Scouse_Mouse said:

It is if he could have taken much more to jump ship ffs xD

It really isn't. 

17 minutes ago, Scouse_Mouse said:

Let's take a player who makes 200K, he get's offered 400K to go to another club, he turns that club down and ends up getting 300K at the club he wanted to stay with.

Yes it's not technically a cut in pay, but he has taken less money to stay where he wants though.

Your head is absolutely messed if you genuinely believe he took a pay cut. Not accepting a higher amount doesn't not mean he took a pay cut xD

The last sentence there is beyond belief. 

You've just said he's getting 300k after originally making 200K. And then you say 'he's taken less money to stay where he wants'. 

Do you genuinely believe this shit you write? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Stan said:

It really isn't. 

Your head is absolutely messed if you genuinely believe he took a pay cut. Not accepting a higher amount doesn't not mean he took a pay cut xD

The last sentence there is beyond belief. 

You've just said he's getting 300k after originally making 200K. And then you say 'he's taken less money to stay where he wants'. 

Do you genuinely believe this shit you write? 

Chelsea offered more, he took less to stay with us.

You're not the sharpest knife in the drawer but honestly Stan but this really isn't as confusing as you seem to think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Stan said:

I don't know how they taught maths or logic in Liverpool back in your day but I pray to God for the children of today that it's different. 

OK I'll bite. Player A earns 100K a week from team A, Team B offers him 200K a week, Player A knocks them back and ends up making less than the 200K offered.

Not sure what school (if any) you attended but did they explain to you how Player A made more turning down the bigger offer?

In your own time Stan.:clown:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This was actually a good thread about Kane and Lewandowski (even though it's not really close is still a decent comparison and worthy of discussion)

Hard now to even locate posts about that subject now with the extent of derailment.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Just now, Harry said:

This was actually a good thread about Kane and Lewandowski (even though it's not really close is still a decent comparison and worthy of discussion)

Hard now to even locate posts about that subject now with the extent of derailment.

 

Sadly true.

Another thread hijacked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Harry said:

This was actually a good thread about Kane and Lewandowski (even though it's not really close is still a decent comparison and worthy of discussion)

Hard now to even locate posts about that subject now with the extent of derailment.

 

It was never a good thread

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Scouse_Mouse said:

Let's take a player who makes 200K, he get's offered 400K to go to another club, he turns that club down and ends up getting 300K at the club he wanted to stay with.

Yes it's not technically a cut in pay, but he has taken less money to stay where he wants though.

And btw I am as confused as anyone why this is still going on? It started off about Lewandowski and Kane, highjacked by DDW and Spike, had it been hijacked by a newbie it would have been closed long ago mate.

I said ‘specialist in failure’ didn’t even name names, you projected Gerard onto that. But if a Freudian slip of you ask me, the heart knows the truth

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator
7 hours ago, Scouse_Mouse said:

OK I'll bite. Player A earns 100K a week from team A, Team B offers him 200K a week, Player A knocks them back and ends up making less than the 200K offered.

Not sure what school (if any) you attended but did they explain to you how Player A made more turning down the bigger offer?

In your own time Stan.:clown:

 

If you don't take the offer how do you 'make more' money? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Spike said:

I said ‘specialist in failure’ didn’t even name names, you projected Gerard onto that. But if a Freudian slip of you ask me, the heart knows the truth

You said specialist in failure, I asked you to explain.........your "explanation" was to post Gerrard videos.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Scouse_Mouse said:

You said specialist in failure, I asked you to explain.........your "explanation" was to post Gerrard videos.

 

 

because i knew you would have meltdown about it, which you did and still are having

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Cicero said:

Amazing when members are actually serious, he says they are obvious WUMs. Then when members are being obvious WUMs, he says they are serious. xD

It really is a bit weird

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


Sign up or subscribe to remove this ad.


×
×
  • Create New...