Jump to content
talkfootball365
  • Welcome to talkfootball365!

    The better place to talk football.

UEFA's Ultimate Team of the 21st Century


football forum

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 92
  • Created
  • Last Reply
34 minutes ago, SirBalon said:

Do your XI then mate... It'll be interesting to see how you shift the side.  This isn't easy and those who made the vote for UEFA to publish this have compromised many things so as to fit trademark names in.

----------------------Buffon

Lahm---------Ramos---Puyol--Maldini

---------------------Xavi---------------------------

------------Zidane----Seedorf

Messi--------Raul---------C.Ronaldo

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, VanPaddy said:

----------------------Buffon

Lahm---------Ramos---Puyol--Maldini

---------------------Xavi---------------------------

------------Zidane----Seedorf

Messi--------Raul---------C.Ronaldo

 

You prefer Zidane to Iniesta?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, VanPaddy said:

Yes of course, otherwise I wouldn't of put him in there. :D

Hmmm...

This has been debated before and is very subjective but (I hate referring to stats), Iniesta has better numbers EVERYWHERE and the most important numbers are the amount of years at the top of the tree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, SirBalon said:

Hmmm...

This has been debated before and is very subjective but (I hate referring to stats), Iniesta has better numbers EVERYWHERE and the most important numbers are the amount of years at the top of the tree.

Maybe but thats the case also for a lot of other players, Zidane was just more of a complete player.  Obviously these things cause a lot of arguments even  like Raul was the king of the Champions League but people choose Henry because his name is about more these days.     Also strikers - Van Nistelrooy has the same goal ratio as Ronaldo 0.77, Consider RVN missed 3 seasons out of his career due to 2 serious knee injuries.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Raul is another terrific shout. The fact Henry is there ahead of Eto'o or Raul is just mind boggling and yet again takes away all credibility of this list. 

Do people honestly sit down and think about it? Or merely pick players off the top of their head or their 'favorites'? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Cicero said:

Raul is another terrific shout. The fact Henry is there ahead of Eto'o or Raul is just mind boggling and yet again takes away all credibility of this list. 

Do people honestly sit down and think about it? Or merely pick players off the top of their head or their 'favorites'? 

Some peope probably dont even know who Raul is.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

good shout with Raul actually. One of Madrid's best ever strikers especially in the Galactico era (along with Ronaldo back then) as well as always delivering in whatever competition. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator
2 minutes ago, Kitchen Sales said:

I'd drop Cristiano Ronaldo for Ronaldinho :ph34r: This team should at least be designed to play good football, not just run the fastest and jump the highest :ph34r:

his live reaction after seeing this post

tenor.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Subscriber
3 hours ago, Stan said:

Ultimate shite.

No Ronaldo or Ronaldinho are the glaring omissions. 

Take out Gerrard for Scholes for sure. 

 

Scholes is the most overrated player ever. 

Gerrard AND Lampard over Scholes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In terms of football in general during this period:-

 

Buffon

Alves -- Puyol -- Maldini -- R.Carlos

Xavi

Iniesta ------- Zidane

Messi -- Ronaldo -- C.Ronaldo

 

Ronaldinho at his best would walk into the team and I, like Harvey, would rather have seen him at his best than C.Ronaldo, but you can't really include the Brazilian over him as he didn't last long enough. C.Ronaldo's consistency, longevity and hard work to stay in shape and continue at a top level until his age is ridiculous. Ronaldinho at his best was much much better to watch, however he was short lived really and became a very frustrating player unfortunately. He could have done much more and it's one of the biggest blows in football how he went downhill so quickly.

 

As for the Champions league only, you can't really argue with Cicero I don't think.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Kitchen Sales said:

Michael Owen - John Hartson

Trevor Sinclair - Jermaine Jenas - Owen Hargreaves - Robbie Savage -Steve McManaman

Martin Keown - Jamie Carragger - Gary Neville

Matt Murray 

No Peter Crouch?

Any ultimate team of the 21st century missing Crouchinho is a joke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


Sign up or subscribe to remove this ad.


×
×
  • Create New...