Jump to content
talkfootball365
  • Welcome!

    Tired of Kevins and Karens on Facebook and other social media platforms?

    Our forum is completely focused on football and moderated to keep discussions civil. Sound good? Sign up!

Climate Change


football forum
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, Happy Blue said:

You don't get in the SAS with low intelligence

Just read it up. Doesn't sound like rocket science. Basically you need to be healthy, athletic and know how to read a map. Oh and blindly follow orders without questioning them of course. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tommy said:

Just read it up. Doesn't sound like rocket science. Basically you need to be healthy, athletic and know how to read a map. Oh and blindly follow orders without questioning them of course. 

You have to have the ability to think for yourself, its not the same as being a regular. You really get to find out what the gouvernements of the world are upto being there goto guy's 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Happy Blue said:

You have to have the ability to think for yourself, its not the same as being a regular. You really get to find out what the gouvernements of the world are upto being there goto guy's 

Apart from obviously not teaching you grammar there, I don't think "thinking for yourself" are the trademarks of a soldier. 

Also, if you ever got captured by foreign forces, they must have been flustered as to why their English is better than yours. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Happy Blue said:

You have to have the ability to think for yourself, its not the same as being a regular. You really get to find out what the gouvernements of the world are upto being there goto guy's 

No body doubts governments aren't honest. There's a differences between that and believing thousands of scientists are all lying 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tommy said:

Apart from obviously not teaching you grammar there, I don't think "thinking for yourself" are the trademarks of a soldier. 

Also, if you ever got captured by foreign forces, they must have been flustered as to why their English is better than yours. 

Theres this thing in philosophy. The most simple explanation is probably the most likely. Its more likely that scientists at least believe climate change is real than they are all lying. Therefore its more rational to believe that than the alternative unless you have good reason not to.

It's the issue with a lot of conspiracies. They're not the most likely scenario. Of course scientists could be wrong. But unless you really know what you are talking about doesn't make much sense to randomly disagree with things you don't like. Thats not to say experts should follow that rule though. Part of science is questioning old ideas. But you have knowledge of the subject and not talk crap which scientists have already debunked. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tommy said:

Apart from obviously not teaching you grammar there, I don't think "thinking for yourself" are the trademarks of a soldier. 

Also, if you ever got captured by foreign forces, they must have been flustered as to why their English is better than yours. 

The fact you are triggered because i know more about the world then you and challenge your belief system says alot about you, you think SAS soldiers are A level students? shows how wet behind the ears you are 🤣 spelling good doesn't mean your smart, id out think you everyday of the week where it matters

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Gunnersaurus said:

No body doubts governments aren't honest. There's a differences between that and believing thousands of scientists are all lying 

There are just as many scientists and people in the know saying its bollocks too. millions are going to freeze this winter, next year there will be a massive food shortage, this is all avoidable but they want to lower and control the population. the 2 year covid lockdown didn't help the climate. climate change is real but it's nothing man is doing 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Happy Blue said:

There are just as many scientists and people in the know saying its bollocks too. millions are going to freeze this winter, next year there will be a massive food shortage, this is all avoidable but they want to lower and control the population. the 2 year covid lockdown didn't help the climate. climate change is real but it's nothing man is doing 

No there aren't. Around 97% say its man made.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Gunnersaurus said:

No there aren't. Around 97% say its man made.

Ok, believe what you like, doesn't matter to me what you choose to believe 🤣 the world is on the brink of ww3 anyway so nothing will matter soon, start getting in shape, you will be drafted if you survive the tactical nukes

  • Facepalm 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this is brilliant: https://apnews.com/article/120afb291f27d866d8263f91cddee5b1

Germany will making plastics producers pay for cleanups - which is smart because it gives an economic incentive for less of the ridiculous amount of pollution plastics cause.

I think this should honestly be extended to a lot of other products. There’s a lot of cheaply made crap that’s got one use, or made for a short lifespan. I’d rather pay more and get something that lasts a while than some piece of shit I’ll have to replace in no time. Too many manufacturers trying to make a quick cash grab.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Happy Blue said:

The fact you are triggered because i know more about the world then you and challenge your belief system says alot about you, you think SAS soldiers are A level students? shows how wet behind the ears you are 🤣 spelling good doesn't mean your smart, id out think you everyday of the week where it matters

Have you ever heard of the Dunning-Kruger effect?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...

Nothing will change while China and India are increasing their industry and accordingly responsible for nearly 2/3 of the emissions globally,  neither are willing to listen to Western influence,  because the collateral damage is there to see for countries that tried to tick the green book checklists and went absolutely bust. 

To plan for the future you need to actually get there,  and sadly the imminent consequences of trying to put the end result first will mean a great many people will not make it to the future.   I remember when common sense was walk before run. 

So apparently 2035 is when it is all ending,  do I need an umbrella,  build an ark or just need a hazmat suit?  I am sure this prediction cant be wrong🙄

Edited by OrangeKhrush
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The rain forest destruction is still going and has been for at least 300 years yet no-one wants to talk about this as it is tied in with population growth yet rain forests are natural carbon sinks.

So as rain forest destruction continues and while too little is done to reduce fossil fuel consumption. then expect more natural disasters and climate emergencies. 

A grim situation.

Nuclear is not the answer either due to the Carrington effect that can melt reactors and no-one can predict where they will land. I believe this is why Germany stopped them though they will not go public.

France had two problems this year one was flooded and the other they blamed on malfunction............

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Happy Blue said:

Net zero will change nothing - oh, apart from the total control over the worlds population 

 

Isn't that the woman who decided that she wasn't getting paid enough working for actual research institutions and now criticises other climate scientists for their findings being related to "funding" while she sells her time and "opinions" to those who'll pay her to be an authority on climate denial?

https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Judith_Curry - xD she's funded by the fossil fuels industry, which is less credible than any papers written with funding given through research grants. Further criticisms of her methodology include:

  • Flawed understanding of uncertainty and probability
  • Misunderstanding her own field's basic terminology
  • Making demonstrably wrong claims and then having no response when presented with evidence that she is wrong
  • Citing blogs as reputable sources
  • Presenting evidence that disproves her own claims on climate change
  • Failure to back up claims with any sort of evidence
  • Uncritical use of invalid data

Not much of a bloody expert tbh.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Dr. Gonzo said:

Isn't that the woman who decided that she wasn't getting paid enough working for actual research institutions and now criticises other climate scientists for their findings being related to "funding" while she sells her time and "opinions" to those who'll pay her to be an authority on climate denial?

https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Judith_Curry - xD she's funded by the fossil fuels industry, which is less credible than any papers written with funding given through research grants. Further criticisms of her methodology include:

  • Flawed understanding of uncertainty and probability
  • Misunderstanding her own field's basic terminology
  • Making demonstrably wrong claims and then having no response when presented with evidence that she is wrong
  • Citing blogs as reputable sources
  • Presenting evidence that disproves her own claims on climate change
  • Failure to back up claims with any sort of evidence
  • Uncritical use of invalid data

Not much of a bloody expert tbh.

They have tried discrediting her and many other climate experts, nothing we do will change the climate that much, its a natural cycle of heating and cooling caused by our star which infact is about to go into a solar minimum so things are going to get colder down here soon enough

  • Facepalm 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Happy Blue said:

They have tried discrediting her and many other climate experts, nothing we do will change the climate that much, its a natural cycle of heating and cooling caused by our star which infact is about to go into a solar minimum so things are going to get colder down here soon enough

You're genuinely an absolute plonker with your conspiracy theories. 

You genuinely believe their is a GLOBAL conspiracy on climate? That every nations scientists have come together in agreement to lie about something that doesn't do anyone any favors, and in fact upsets the old money mining and fossil fuel giants much to the DETRIMENT of these nations? 

A conspiracy theory IMO needs a clear benefactor, needs to be isolated enough that the truth can be concealed (such as a few people or a single government agency) and needs a clear line of hard to believe circumstances or coincidences. 

Your conspiracy requires global cooperation of nations. No fucking way
Needs the rich and powerful to benefit, whereas global warming fucks with them, you're 0 for 2
And so many independent and non government funded scientists are in agreement that that fucks with your ideas too. 
 

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Happy Blue said:

They have tried discrediting her and many other climate experts, nothing we do will change the climate that much, its a natural cycle of heating and cooling caused by our star which infact is about to go into a solar minimum so things are going to get colder down here soon enough

I mean... she seems pretty thoroughly discredited. So I wouldn't so much say they've tried as much as she's been discredited.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Devil-Dick Willie said:

You're genuinely an absolute plonker with your conspiracy theories. 

You genuinely believe their is a GLOBAL conspiracy on climate? That every nations scientists have come together in agreement to lie about something that doesn't do anyone any favors, and in fact upsets the old money mining and fossil fuel giants much to the DETRIMENT of these nations? 

A conspiracy theory IMO needs a clear benefactor, needs to be isolated enough that the truth can be concealed (such as a few people or a single government agency) and needs a clear line of hard to believe circumstances or coincidences. 

Your conspiracy requires global cooperation of nations. No fucking way
Needs the rich and powerful to benefit, whereas global warming fucks with them, you're 0 for 2
And so many independent and non government funded scientists are in agreement that that fucks with your ideas too. 
 

 

Klaus Schwab is the devil, enslavement of the human race is the goal through naturally accruing climate change

 

Edited by Happy Blue
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Happy Blue said:

 

Klaus Schwab is the devil, enslavement of the human race is the goal through naturally accruing climate change

 

Elon is the biggest scam artist on the planet. 

If musk didn't believe in climate change (and he does, watch him on Rogan) why is he building electric cars? 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Devil-Dick Willie said:

Elon is the biggest scam artist on the planet. 

If musk didn't believe in climate change (and he does, watch him on Rogan) why is he building electric cars? 

 

Do you know electric cars are no cleaner than running my V6? the extra electricity that needs to be made to power these things is probably currently worse 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Happy Blue said:

 

Do you know electric cars are no cleaner than running my V6? the extra electricity that needs to be made to power these things is probably currently worse 

 

 

That's because the grid is dirty and lithium mining is barely regulated in 3rd world countries. 2 fixable issues. Fossil fuel will always be dirty.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Devil-Dick Willie said:

That's because the grid is dirty and lithium mining is barely regulated in 3rd world countries. 2 fixable issues. Fossil fuel will always be dirty.

You think they would address this problem before trying to force people into electric vehicles wouldn't you 🤣 i'm all for solar energy and the latest developments and breakthroughs in solar technology include longer-lasting solar cells, solar cells that you can print onto flexible surfaces, solar panels that track the sun from east to west throughout the day, and solar power plants that work at night are very promising 

Edited by Happy Blue
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Happy Blue said:

You think they would address this problem before trying to force people into electric vehicles wouldn't you 🤣 i'm all for solar energy and The latest developments and breakthroughs in solar technology include longer-lasting solar cells, solar cells that you can print onto flexible surfaces, solar panels that track the sun from east to west throughout the day, and solar power plants that work at night are very promising 

I love solar too. But no, the timing was never going to be good. Things are driven by economic incentive, which is why green energy is taking so fucking long to be mixed into the grid. It's come to the point where it's literally 'we need to replace fossil fuels because the effects have gotten bad, are getting worse and we're running the fuck out anyway'. We should have been going big guns on solar and wind energy (where appropriate) a decade ago. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, OrangeKhrush said:

Nothing will change while China and India are increasing their industry and accordingly responsible for nearly 2/3 of the emissions globally,  neither are willing to listen to Western influence,  because the collateral damage is there to see for countries that tried to tick the green book checklists and went absolutely bust. 

To plan for the future you need to actually get there,  and sadly the imminent consequences of trying to put the end result first will mean a great many people will not make it to the future.   I remember when common sense was walk before run. 

So apparently 2035 is when it is all ending,  do I need an umbrella,  build an ark or just need a hazmat suit?  I am sure this prediction cant be wrong🙄

China is the largest manufacturer, investor and user of renewable energy in the world, get the fuck off Fox News. China will be carbon neutral years before the USA.

Edited by Spike
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

football forum
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...