Subscriber RandoEFC+ 7,661 Posted November 10, 2019 Subscriber Share Posted November 10, 2019 1 minute ago, LFCMadLad said: Match fixing claims We are just better than them. Rick is the only person who mentioned match fixing . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LFCMadLad 2,080 Posted November 10, 2019 Share Posted November 10, 2019 Just now, RandoEFC said: They finally showed a replay a minute or two ago. It looks offside from the diagonal camera angle but Stones' foot was playing him on. I actually thought Salah's nose hair was offside tbh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Gonzo 8,184 Posted November 10, 2019 Share Posted November 10, 2019 2 minutes ago, RandoEFC said: Yeah when those famous Liverpool haters @Dan, @Storts and @Dr. Gonzo reckon it was a handball then it's probably just biased people calling it match fixing and not a legitimate opinion . I don’t think it’s match fixing, I just think England’s referees are shite Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Artful Dodger 1,831 Posted November 10, 2019 Share Posted November 10, 2019 9 minutes ago, Rick said: It did indeed. But it’s much easier to claim match fixing. Yes. Ive told you before, see the comments on this forum. All anti Liverpool from Hertfordshire to Leicestershire. Just enjoy it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LFCMike 3,009 Posted November 10, 2019 Share Posted November 10, 2019 How does Fernandinho not get booked for that foul on Fabinho?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LFCMadLad 2,080 Posted November 10, 2019 Share Posted November 10, 2019 Just now, LFCMike said: How does Fernandinho not get booked for that foul on Fabinho?! Because its match fixing mate.. didn't you know? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subscriber RandoEFC+ 7,661 Posted November 10, 2019 Subscriber Share Posted November 10, 2019 Just now, The Artful Dodger said: Yes. Ive told you before, see the comments on this forum. All anti Liverpool from Hertfordshire to Leicestershire. Just enjoy it. Why is it suddenly about Liverpool? When people were calling Alli's handball out against us last weekend was it because there's a nationwide agenda against North London? The ball hit his hand, whether it's handball or not is up for debate but the ball hit his hand, it's not like people are just making this up. And if you continue to demean legitimate debate and opinions that are in any way against Liverpool by fobbing it off as some sort of anti-Scouse agenda, it only happens more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick 2,276 Posted November 10, 2019 Share Posted November 10, 2019 I’m not the one mentioning match fixing first. Got people in here calling the decisions “bent” and “something is going on”. Everybody STILL happily ignoring that Silva played the ball with his arm first, just moments before it hit Trent’s. I’m not denying that it was handball, but if you’re giving it for that then you give it for Silva’s too. So City can’t have any complaints. Also, not sure what people are looking at but on the reply it’s clearly showed Salah to be onside. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Artful Dodger 1,831 Posted November 10, 2019 Share Posted November 10, 2019 4 minutes ago, RandoEFC said: Why is it suddenly about Liverpool? When people were calling Alli's handball out against us last weekend was it because there's a nationwide agenda against North London? The ball hit his hand, whether it's handball or not is up for debate but the ball hit his hand, it's not like people are just making this up. And if you continue to demean legitimate debate and opinions that are in any way against Liverpool by fobbing it off as some sort of anti-Scouse agenda, it only happens more. Im just amazed how anyone who lives in this country can think there is a bias towards anything to do with Liverpool. You're sound. Evertonians should hate Liverpool. And yes I did think you were fucked over last week and said so! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LFCMike 3,009 Posted November 10, 2019 Share Posted November 10, 2019 2 minutes ago, RandoEFC said: Why is it suddenly about Liverpool? When people were calling Alli's handball out against us last weekend was it because there's a nationwide agenda against North London? The ball hit his hand, whether it's handball or not is up for debate but the ball hit his hand, it's not like people are just making this up. And if you continue to demean legitimate debate and opinions that are in any way against Liverpool by fobbing it off as some sort of anti-Scouse agenda, it only happens more. I'm sure he said the Alli handball was just that to be fair Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick 2,276 Posted November 10, 2019 Share Posted November 10, 2019 So sky just showed the replay that shows it coming off Silvas hand milliseconds before it hits Trents. So, two handballs, cancel each other out so I don’t see the outrage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LFCMike 3,009 Posted November 10, 2019 Share Posted November 10, 2019 3 minutes ago, Rick said: I’m not the one mentioning match fixing first. Got people in here calling the decisions “bent” and “something is going on”. Everybody STILL happily ignoring that Silva played the ball with his arm first, just moments before it hit Trent’s. I’m not denying that it was handball, but if you’re giving it for that then you give it for Silva’s too. So City can’t have any complaints. Also, not sure what people are looking at but on the reply it’s clearly showed Salah to be onside. If it led to a goal it would have been a handball against Silva but the letter of the law says it's not a handball against Trent or whoever it was Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subscriber Dan+ 1,918 Posted November 10, 2019 Subscriber Share Posted November 10, 2019 Nobody answered me on that bit about it hitting an arm in the build up to Fabinho's goal. Even if it's not enough for a penalty, any contact with the arm (which 100% happened) in the build up rules the goal out by default. It's happened a few times this season. They didn't think this through at all when they came up with these rules. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subscriber RandoEFC+ 7,661 Posted November 10, 2019 Subscriber Share Posted November 10, 2019 1 minute ago, The Artful Dodger said: Im just amazed how anyone who lives in this country can think there is a bias towards anything to do with Liverpool. You're sound. Evertonians should hate Liverpool. Has anyone said that? I dont think there's bias towards Liverpool but I do think it's *possible* that the magnitude of the fixture has influenced their decision. 1 minute ago, LFCMike said: I'm sure he said the Alli handball was just that to be fair That's not my point. What I'm saying is last week people were fairly arguing that Alli's handball should have been a penalty. Nobody painted this as an agenda against Spurs or North London. This week people are fairly arguing that TAA handled the ball and suddenly it's because the Midlands and the rest of the country are prejudiced against Merseyside and scousers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subscriber Storts+ 2,424 Posted November 10, 2019 Subscriber Share Posted November 10, 2019 If anyone is missing a chip you’ll find it on TAD’s shoulder just fyi. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick 2,276 Posted November 10, 2019 Share Posted November 10, 2019 Just now, Storts said: If anyone is missing a chip you’ll find it on TAD’s shoulder just fyi. He’s borrowed it off Alli. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subscriber Storts+ 2,424 Posted November 10, 2019 Subscriber Share Posted November 10, 2019 3 minutes ago, Dan said: Nobody answered me on that bit about it hitting an arm in the build up to Fabinho's goal. Even if it's not enough for a penalty, any contact with the arm (which 100% happened) in the build up rules the goal out by default. It's happened a few times this season. They didn't think this through at all when they came up with these rules. This yeah, I guess they’ve deemed it’s a separate passage of play and considering Fabinho got it from a City clearance I think it’s fair enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Artful Dodger 1,831 Posted November 10, 2019 Share Posted November 10, 2019 2 minutes ago, Dan said: Nobody answered me on that bit about it hitting an arm in the build up to Fabinho's goal. Even if it's not enough for a penalty, any contact with the arm (which 100% happened) in the build up rules the goal out by default. It's happened a few times this season. They didn't think this through at all when they came up with these rules. I'm guessing they mean in the build up to the attacking side's goal, so when silva's attack faded away they thought well the handball from Taa is only equal to the one by silva so fair to let it stand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Artful Dodger 1,831 Posted November 10, 2019 Share Posted November 10, 2019 1 minute ago, Storts said: If anyone is missing a chip you’ll find it on TAD’s shoulder just fyi. You're the one who has just effectively said the league is bent towards to Liverpool, soft lad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subscriber RandoEFC+ 7,661 Posted November 10, 2019 Subscriber Share Posted November 10, 2019 If they've decided it wasn't handball then there's no reason to pull it back. You can't say a touch in your own area is in the build up to a goal at the other end. The Bernardo handball was completely accidental but my understanding is that if the ball had broken to Sterling and he scored then it should have been disallowed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subscriber Storts+ 2,424 Posted November 10, 2019 Subscriber Share Posted November 10, 2019 4 minutes ago, The Artful Dodger said: You're the one who has just effectively said the league is bent towards to Liverpool, soft lad. Sorry life has been so tough on you petal. The interpretation of VAR is bent. To go from the farce of Sheffield Uniteds disallowed goal yesterday and the extensive checks we had then, to today’s sham is another nail in the coffin for the current iteration of VAR. Like when people put words in my mouth though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inverted 1,776 Posted November 10, 2019 Share Posted November 10, 2019 Football is truly amazing escapism. It can even give Southerners a chance to feel oppressed to the benefit of northern industrial towns. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subscriber Storts+ 2,424 Posted November 10, 2019 Subscriber Share Posted November 10, 2019 That’s the game. City a shambles at the back Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick 2,276 Posted November 10, 2019 Share Posted November 10, 2019 Beep beep bitch!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subscriber Pyfish+ 2,773 Posted November 10, 2019 Subscriber Share Posted November 10, 2019 3-0! Brilliant cross by Henderson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.