Persephone

Tottenham, being serious, are an unfortunate club who promises a lot but gives very little back. I wouldn't put it in those terms but the inner Gooner in me does make you right.

No, I'm only trying to make you see what you've written, I'm not offended trust me, it's more a case of not seeing the wood for the trees. I have no clue what has happened here but the way both of you have mentioned it means something has happened here and yes, it isn't my business but the general issue is a world problem thus making it everyone's business.

No, but to bringing it up means the site has had problems, I'm basically telling you I wont put up with those issues, a general statement and to state very categorically (and Publicly) I don't tolerate such attitudes or comments. You both have, never assume anything

Okay? No.

I'm sorry I have risen above crude bigotry and adolescent pettiness, these are the same staple racism and xenophobic tendencies are borne from, understanding and mutual respect should be adhered too, banter should be whitty and spontaneous and not offend anyone, things get out of hand when the Neanderthals think they've said something mummy would praise them for. You are not funny and I am offended!!!!

I was trying to be diplomatic, although the Gooner in me suggests they should hire Christian Gross as manager again!

So what is it you like about me? I hope you read the bio I painstakingly wrote and see I live in one of the most diverse boroughs in London, if you're attracting racists xenophobic bigots then you may need to take a harder line? have either of you been to London? You have both discriminated against me but that's fine, let's craic on!!!

Well, my opinion is you were and Chelsea were indeed lacklustre, it was a great strike by Teilemans but maybe in another match the ball striking a hand could have reversed the decision or possibly he would have been closed down quicker? For you it was a great day but for the rest it was a bit of a stalemate, whoever blinked first lost. Simples!

Which means you agree or not? Finals have always 'mostly' been cagey affiairs.

I would have to agree, we are total shit at the moment but spurs have a quality squad, under the right manager who can galvanise them they can be a great team.

Nah, the final was below par and either team could have taken it. It doesn't matter if Rodger's leaves or stays but going to spurs is not for him.

Then Leicester need to consolidate their position and grow and they can, unlike many teams they seem to have very good owners which means they can attract bigger investors and sponsors. This new season will be the bench mark for them.

Spurs are a big club, they've had a bad appointment in choice of manager but their next appointment is key. Low and behold they're still fighting in the top half of the table if Rodgers leaves Leicester then they will suffer. They won the Final due to Chelsea being lacklustre and them getting lucky, truth is like many finals it was a dower game.

I think Spurs are famous for many things, can't believe I'm sticking up for them. Leicester are new to the scene I think they need to stick around first.

Because Spurs are a bigger club, pains me to say it but they have a decent pedigree.

That's fine but I did think this was a serious discussion thread.

So avoidance is the key, I'm sketchy anyway. My interest was from the fact they dramatized the Franklin expedition which is shrouded in mystery. But they froze to death, made bad decisions and very probably got eaten by polar bears and suffered from the effects of acute lead poisoning amongst a number of factors brought on by being in a desperate situation. But the series portrayed it very well so maybe not to destroy it with a crap over cooked second season.

The general synopsis is a bit weird, I only watched the first series through interest in the Franklin expedition and I have to say they did the story very well. I'm not sure if they had the relevant information on the lead poisoning not being a major factor but included it into the story line very and explains the hallucinogenic scenes. Just not sure about the second season but will give it a look.

I totally regard the Cohen brothers1996 film one of the best films I have watched the plot line and acting is amazing, Peter Stormare is brilliant as a nasty villain and very cold and calculated. many of the Cohen brothers films are great, Millers crossing and the Big Lebowsky remain massive as well as Raising Arizona, must watch films.

They had their chance and I think it's time someone new (ish) came 'back' up.

personally would love to see Barnsley promoted.

Can't believe this is a second season and not standalone considering the story of the first is based 'loosely' on the Franklin expedition in the 1840s.

It is generally about watching other peoples views on TV programs and how they react. It is a very modern fascination or reality TV and has become very popular and very cheap to make creating celebrities out of everyday people. For me it's brainwash TV after a week at work and considering there is nothing noteworthy to watch on any other channel.

So this means he is a sure as dam it going to Spurs?

You sure? One bad appointment doesn't make them a 'bad' club but a decent appointment now could lift them right up, do pay spurs their credit they have a good squad which has been used badly.