Jump to content
talkfootball365
  • Welcome to talkfootball365!

    The better place to talk football.

JoshBRFC

Subscriber+
  • Posts

    4,672
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    11

Posts posted by JoshBRFC

  1. 5 hours ago, Danny said:

    How much harder? I had to put sliders on for career mode as it became too easy. Winning every game 4/5/6-0, ended up winning the treble and the double in consecutive seasons with Aston Villa.

    Don’t okay against the CPU much, more meant hard to master. I’ve been playing online Ultimate Team. 

  2. 1 hour ago, Honey Honey said:

    Which other clubs have broken the 3 year rule? Aston Villa came close but as far as I'm aware ended OK. Forest have already started recalibration.

    Man City and Chelsea are under investigation for fraud, very different, far more serious and complex. 

    Everton are a lesson to anyone who tries to taks a punt at bettering themselves.

    Basically, the rule is £105m on paper, but in practice if you dare to get up to £105m from a mid table position you are gambling. Thats the lesson here. So really the unwritten rule is more like £50m-£75m for the mid table clubs.

    The saddest part in all of this is Everton failed. They didn't even manage to make a good enough team to progress. They've basically had to sell good players sending them further back than where they started from, isn't that enough of a price to pay? Now they're getting a points deduction as well it is kicking a man when he's down. 

    You can argue rules are rules, but I do think it should be weighted by the advantage you gave yourself. And no, Leeds and Burnley didn't get relegated because of Everton overspending, quite the opposite, Everton were only at Leeds and Burnleys level in the first place because their spending failed and they then had to sell sell sell. Where does it end? Everton pay everyone below them in the pyramid until they're in the conference?

    Cheers mate, makes sense. I’ve not spent time looking into it and knew asking the question on here would give me a better insight than searching online.

  3. 3 hours ago, Stan said:

    Should be Haaland, will be Messi. 

    Next year surely has to be Bellingham. The man is a machine. World class. 

    Agreed on Bellingham and would be great to see also. 
     

     

  4. 2 hours ago, Danny said:

    It was an exhibition and Fury treated it as such. I think in a proper fight, 12 rounds, belts on the line Ngannou doesn’t get close on points

    It was a professionally sanctioned fight and it counts on both records.
     

    Ngannou was just too big for Fury and he couldn’t use his weight and size as his main advantage like he usually does. 

    Massively overrated boxer, and talks of him being an all time great are laughable. 

  5. 1 hour ago, Danny said:

    Yeah I think Ngannou fought well but Fury made him look a lot better than he is, I think in an actual competitive fight Fury, Joshua, Usyk, Whyte, whoever, takes real advantage of a) his lack of boxing/point scoring in the ring and b) his chin that he left wide open all night.

    Tad confused reading this.
     

    It was a competitive and professional point scoring bout?

  6. Great from Adam Catterall. Worth a listen.

    Him and Talk Sport are banned from all Fury events because they don’t just listen to his absolute verbal diarrhoea like the rest of the public. 

    • Thanks 1
×
×
  • Create New...