Dr. Gonzo

1 hour ago, Redcanuck said:

Was to be expected in that venue. Only the first round though, I suspect they will appeal immediately to the Supreme Court and they will likely toss it out.

Can stuff from state courts go to federal courts?

It seems like it was expected because the evidence against him was overwhelming, rather than the venue.

30 minutes ago, Spike said:

Obama was more of a centrist than progressive, mate. Democrats are a right wing party with some factions that lean more central or left. It's just how America is; and in regards to Republicans that's an effect of the Reagan administration and the big party switch.

Yeah, democrats for the most part are basically tories. Republicans on the other hand are just insane & their extremist fringe is now the party base.

Trump guilty on all counts in his hush money for fucking a pornstar trial!

6 minutes ago, RandoEFC said:

Not to mention the treatment of Diane Abbott. All so unnecessary and poorly handled.

Remember when some in Labour claimed Corbyn would push for purges due to ideological purity tests?

Seems like more a confession than an accusation at this point.

1 hour ago, 6666 said:

Labour are just trying to be as Tory as possible without being as Tory as the Tories.

I think Starmer wants to be PM at all costs and in the UK, Labour's only going to get a PM if they're like Tony Blair - i.e., only way Labour get a PM is if they're not really very Labour at all. The electorate generally likes Tories, even if they're clueless scum. Right now confidence in Tories is at an all time low because the country's gone to absolute shit.

I blame the electorate for the state of UK politics. And the media... but mostly the electorate. I'd have been able to forgive them if they could see through the right-wing media after just a few years of shambolic governance... but they stuck by some absolute rotten politicians even when shown the bullshit criticisms of certain labour politicians were simply bullshit.

Our democracy has a lot that makes me think "well... that's not very democratic" - but it's still a democracy so ultimately the voters shoulder a lot of blame for the policies and general woefulness of their governments.

This is why history classes are important.

The university students in the US currently protesting have much more in common with the Iranians who were members of National Front & Tudeh during the Iranian revolution. They were against the Shah, but did not want the kind of life for Iranians that Khomeini, and the shitbag Khamenei who would follow him, would draw up for them.

If you value things like human rights and are against oppression and you ally with Islamicists like Khamenei, Sinwar, Haniyeh, Nasrallah, or Al-Houthi... you are hurting your cause and working against your values. And at the end of the day if you help them succeed, you're probably going to bring about a whole new form of oppression you'd never really have imagined in the first place.

3 minutes ago, OrangeKhrush said:

Got dual citizenship

Think you still have to be in Israel to vote for Israeli elections

3 hours ago, OrangeKhrush said:

They traded an Iranian dynasty for an Islamic totalitarian one.   In the end we know the wrong one is in power.

Calling the Pahlavis an Iranian dynasty is a bit funny. There were 2 of them. One put in power by the UK until he started acting like not a puppet. Then he was replaced by a democracy. Then that democracy started acting in its national interests. Then the US and UK got scared of what that might do to oil prices so they put in the first Shah’s son. And he was a corrupt autocrat who was also a terrible statesman, only fostering ties with one American political party despite being a US puppet.

Western media also played a role in Khomeini’s rise from obscurity in exile in Iraq to becoming an internationally recognizable face of revolution and anti-western imperialism. That was probably done because of the Cold War - the US feared communism and preferred the idea of dealing with religious extremists & Europeans and the West generally has seemingly long had the idea that brown people in the Middle East need authoritarian rule rather than democracy.

Why are they even doing this? It's not like big clubs don't regularly make the final for this cup (or any domestic cup final).

On 23/05/2024 at 03:15, Spike said:

Or they think he is very smart due to the size of his head.

No matter how this appointment goes, this is what I assume is the actual truth behind Bayern appointing him.

It looks nice

10 hours ago, Devil-Dick Willie said:

Russia, China, bigger easter european clubs Prague, Zagreb, Shakhtar are all options. North Italy?

Does Mars have any football teams? Better send him up there so he can check.

3 hours ago, Rucksackfranzose said:

Is he that bad or are Leicester interested in him as well? Genuine question since not following Premier League.

He's a violent rapist, no club should want anything to do with him.

Bit young to be fucking off to a retirement league as a keeper tbh. If it's something like £200m + then sure, we should think about it because that's some squad building money. But otherwise, probably better to sell off Kelleher and keep one of the best keepers in Europe while he's still got plenty of time left at the top cos he's a keeper.

22 hours ago, Danny said:

Can’t help but think this is a silly move, but with Leicester’s potential deductions it might actually make sense for him

It’s easy money, if he does well or doesn’t do well.

55 minutes ago, Happy Blue said:

Imagine people actually believing nobody gives a fuck!  ..a few bitters don't matter mate, our fan base worldwide is bigger than yours, 5th biggest in the world ..Pep's think over a 5year contract extension too and we getting cleared of the 115, think we better just talk about guitars because football is just too depressing for you 

I’ve never met a City fan in England and the only City fan I’ve met in the US used to be a United fan and ditched them when they became shit lol. I roasted that yank cunt like it was my job.

Guitars & metal > football

44 minutes ago, OrangeKhrush said:

It is pretty wrong,  if he is found guilty will he get 10 months with a suspended sentence like Tonali? or do the FA go softer and give like 6 with a suspended 6. 

Seems worse than what Tonalli did, tbh. I think ultimately with his betting, he wasn't betting on Newcastle - plus he was already suspended so he's not playing in these matches he was betting on. With Paqueta he's alleged to have not only bet on West Ham matches, but bet that he would receive a yellow card in matches he received yellow cards.

That's not the most mindblowingly corrupt version of match fixing - in fact, it might be the least egregious match fixing possible. But it's still match fixing and if the FA has any sense (which, tbh, the jury is still out on that) they will want to crack down hard on any evidence of match fixing taking place to do all they can to remove any appearance of being okay with any form of corruption in English football.

Having said that, counting on these bodies of authority to understand that the appearance of corruption opens up more allegations of corruption an possibly be a lost cause. We've already seem PMGOL see no issue with allowing referees to work side gigs working for the owners of Man City and Newcastle - which presents a pretty obvious appearance of a conflict of interest that invites allegations of corruption to our top flight referees.

So hopefully the FA take this seriously, because a player betting on outcomes they can control in matches they play in should never be allowed. And cracking down on it now with something seeming relatively mild makes it clear to any players who might want to fix matches more seriously that they'll face a harsh punishment if/when they are caught.

I honestly wouldn't mind if they make an example of him and ban him from playing in England. Players betting on things they do in a match should simply never be tolerated and making a harsh example out of him serves as a big big warning to the rest of the players. This is probably too harsh of a punishment for West Ham though as his market value will plummet.

2 hours ago, Redcanuck said:

I have a feeling he may end up at United.  Talk about about out of the fat into the frying pan.

I think Poch is a better manager than Ten Hairs, but I also don't think he's the right guy to take a club finally turn the corner and demonstrate he can have a club be consistently competitive.

Think there should be a pretty harsh ban if they can prove he'd placed bets on getting a yellow in these matches and then actually did get a yellow.

1 hour ago, Rucksackfranzose said:

Again: Although I checked English oddschecker, and saw many British person betted on the likes of De Zerbi, Zidane, Mourinho, and others; Bayern signing a non-German speaking manager is about as likely as Jürgen Klopp appearing to a Liverpool fan meeting with an Everton/ Man United half-and-half scarf.

Did Pep speak German when he joined them?

Honestly if their thinking is Kompany’s willing to take the job and speaks German, they should probably reevaluate their criteria.

Get the best manager for the job, they’re Bayern Munich… they can pay for private language teachers, Rosetta Stone, & translators to make it work.

17 minutes ago, Rucksackfranzose said:

Wait and see. Allegedly they'only reason didn't sign Glasner because the asking price was too high for their liking, don't would bet on Bayern agreeing to pay the 20M transfer fee Burnley are rumoured to ask for.

They’re honestly better off if they go for Mourinho

Bayern Munich taking Kompany from this relegated Burnley is absolutely mental.

This season’s Burnley were one of the most useless promoted sides I’ve ever seen come up.

This is genuinely funny.

58 minutes ago, OrangeKhrush said:

Leverkusen had an unreal season,  but to lose the last game is going to be an absolute kick in the nuts and undermines the hard work.   Sure they won the Bundesliga,  but winning the Europa would have been worth a lot more. 

Atalanta were brilliant,  Koopmeiners is a boss. 

They’d never won the Bundesliga before and won it without losing to any side until a Europa Cup final, this will be shortly forgotten and still be considered their best ever season.

It’s a blow but it’s not like it “undermines the hard work” & the Europa League’s certainly not worth more than a league title.

Gasperini & Atalanta deserve a lot of credit for the cup run they’ve had. Also I’ll take 1 Ederson for our midfield please.

There’s truth in what both @OrangeKhrush& @Spike have said, but it’s a bit more nuanced.

The left wing did help Khomeini take power. But it wasn’t just the left wing. It was the centrists and the right wing too. Anyone not in the very upper crust of the Shah’s Iran had serious and legitimate grievances - across all segments of life. It wasn’t partisan.

And ultimately the IR betrayed them all. That’s why all of the legitimate problems that existed under the Shah still exist today… it’s just worse.

But Spike is right that ultimately it’s Carter’s fault. A US puppet only falls when the US stops caring to pull the strings.

I think it's mental that Chelsea have had something like 20 managers since 2004.

Just for comparison, Liverpool has had 21 managers since 1896.

I imagine they go for Tuchel again now.

The people making the decisions at Chelsea are the most clueless idiots in football though. Chelsea, finally end a season with some stability... for the first time in years. 20 points more than last season, losing only 1 out of 15 matches, and getting European football when earlier this season the idea of Chelsea playing in Europe would have seemed totally unrealistic. And they sack him?

Absolute clown show at Chelsea.