Jump to content
talkfootball365
  • Welcome to talkfootball365!

    The better place to talk football.

6666

Member
  • Posts

    6,148
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Posts posted by 6666

  1. 7 hours ago, Rick said:

    We should have won with the Trent chance, but then again we should have had a penalty for that fucking handball. Absolutely fed up to the back teeth of these refs, useless bastards the lot of them. 
     

    A point is alright, I was a bit concerned that Arsenal were gonna hit us with a quick second but they soon reverted back to their usual ‘shit the bed’ attitude and we were the better team. If we lose the title to those jokers, we’ll have missed a trick. 

    Don't know why you're so rattled. We should've had a penalty for Havertz being pushed over in the box late on. Bad penalty decisions evened out.

    Main reason you didn't win was because TAA shit the bed with his finishing. Other than that, you really didn't trouble Raya that much. It was even.

  2. 59 minutes ago, JoshBRFC said:

    Why is everyone so surprised by this fight? 

    Wilder has never been an elite boxer and his resume is Fury and Ortiz who was 86 years old. 

    He needs a knockout going into the last 3 rounds. Parker has won every round. 

    Yeah, the whole thing about Wilder is that he's not an amazing boxer but he was a magic punch. Seen him get out boxed many times but then once punch and he's won. Not a sustainable tactic.

  3. 3 hours ago, Beelzebub said:

    Reminder: Srebrenica is widely called out for what it was and not made a complex topic because the perpetrators are disliked by the West also as mini-Russia lol

    Different rules for "allies" regardless of how obvious it is that they're scum. People even get mad and gaslight whoever stands up to those types of countries...

  4. 2 hours ago, Dr. Gonzo said:

    I mean... with Hamas you haven't even said they're bad. You said what they did was akin to a slave revolt (even though... they're meant to be the fuckin' government of Gaza). You think the Houthis shooting missiles that... aren't doing anything other than interfering with shipping lanes and are going to cause the US Navy to strike (which means more death for Yemenis) is a good thing. To your credit, you did come close to saying the Houthis are bad (but at this point, I'm going to have to assume that's because they're Shia) - but you still think they're doing a good thing.

    So you're taking bad actions that haven't resulted in anything other than death of innocents - and you're attributing good qualities to them because you've taken a side. You taking a side and seeing these things as "bad" or "good" is very much seeing the world in black and white.

    You playing the "both sides are equally responsible" card, which implies Palestinians should be more tolerating of their oppression without any resistance, might make sense to you but no sane minded person who's being objective and empathetic is going along with that.

    I have also said that I'm able to criticise Hamas for the wrong that they do but as far as standing up to Israel, can't blame them for that at all. Same with the Houthis. That's the opposite of viewing things in black and white. Viewing certain parts as good or bad isn't a contradiction to that as I'm acknowledging it's not all one thing and that it is made up of different parts. Something which you're not doing.

    The sad and unfortunate thing is that it will probably lead to the deaths of more innocent people but that'd be the fault of those that view killing people in the middle east as normal, not the fault of those standing up to it. Just like slave rebellions, the slave masters punishing slaves and being harsher with slaves after rebellions wasn't the fault of slaves that dared to step out of line. I can stay consistent with that logic. Some will go "No point rebelling when you know it's gonna lead to a brutal response and it'd be your fault" one day and "of course they're gonna rebel, the brutal response proves what they have to deal with and their rebelling should be applauded" on another day...

  5. 5 hours ago, Dr. Gonzo said:

    You’re the one looking at it in black and white, genius. So yes, that is emphatically “gonna be you”

    I’m not sitting around praising Hamas, the IDF, the Houthis, etc. You’re the one who’s now praised Hamas and the Houthis. You’ve obviously taken a side. And you think it’s just to back one of two genocidal sides.

    I laughed at the media trusting bit though

     

    1 hour ago, Spike said:

    That’s what you do.

    Specifically saying that there are no good guys and that I judge on a case by case basis where "If they're doing bad things, I say they're doing bad things but if they're doing good things, I say they're doing good things" is suddenly now a case of treating things as being too black and white when compared to people saying "They're bad so everything bad. Circumstances don't matter "... Sure. xD

     

  6. 4 minutes ago, Dr. Gonzo said:

    The Houthis are awful people, you’re just praising them because they’re attacking the right people” in your eyes.

    Wow you figured it out. Well done.

    You may want to look at things lazily in a black and white way and good luck with that but that's not gonna be me. "These are the good guys on the international scene and they only do good things and those are the bad guys that only do bad things" is a very media trusting way to look at things though. It's sweet.

  7. 17 minutes ago, Dr. Gonzo said:

    Lol your “case by case” basis is: do these human rights abusers hate the human rights abusers I hate?

    “No good guys, but I’ve taken a side in a conflict between two human rights abusers so I’ve clearly decided one side is good.”

    Alright you’ve lost me on “at least your ideologically consistent”

    What I said really isn't that complicated but you're making it out to be just so you can pretend you're taking the right stance.

    If they're doing something good, I'll say they're doing something good. If they're doing something bad, I'll say they're doing something bad. Not that complicated.

  8. On 17/12/2023 at 11:58, The Palace Fan said:

    I really wanted AEW to succeed as an alternative but Tony Khan has made it impossible to root for them at this point.

    Yesterday he was whigning at AEW being 'under constant attack' on Twitter and then proceeded to call Disco Inferno a Worthless Parasite on the same platform.

    He struggles to get out of the mindset of being a tribalist fan. Small time mentality.

  9. 1 hour ago, Dr. Gonzo said:

    Yeah I mean at least you're ideologically consistent.

    Yep. No "good guys" so I'll judge situations on a case by case basis rather than blindly follow or blindly discredit based on names. Or throw a blanket over things and judge things by if they're "US backed" or "Iran backed"... It's a much smarter and less naive way of looking at things in my opinion.

  10. 5 hours ago, Dr. Gonzo said:

    Lol literally praising the Houthis stopping international shipping lanes.

    Oh no.

    5 hours ago, Dr. Gonzo said:

    Yemenis deserve the right to self determination rather than have their country be a battleground between two despicable regimes.

    That part I agree with.

    Them fucking with Nazi Israel is top notch stuff though and should be praised.

×
×
  • Create New...