Bluewolf

Christians against Lions I could understand....

Not watched any more for a couple of days but will catch up over the next few nights..

Where's @SirBalon????

Yes mate it is..

Would not surprise me if that's the best he is able to communicate with people..

Can I have a do over???

Do you eat Py?? If so which is your favourite?? 1. Chicken Py? 2. Steak&Kidney Py? 3. Minced Beef&Onion Py?

Well I don't know the bloke he is my mates mate but it hit him pretty hard, can't imagine how you would handle getting news like that to be honest.. Think I would rather not know, if the dog had not bitten him he never would have known...

I think if he changed his name from 'Tammy' to something a bit more threatening might help him... If that had been my nickname I might have been inclined to change it so I was known as Joe the 'Scorpion' as a striker for example so goalkeepers up and down the country start getting jelly legs at the thought of trying to keep my shots out of the back of the net or maybe Joe 'The Bull' if I was a defender having strikers up and down the country sweating buckets at the mere mention of my name on the team sheet... If I had been called Joe 'The Durex' during my playing time I don't think I would have done as well to be honest... Anyway, Hoping we can bounce on from that promising midweek game and 'Tammy' gets a hat trick.. third time lucky and all that..

Bruce Lee mate.. Bruce Lee

Had my mate down from Notts yesterday for a stopover before going on to Coventry to say goodbye to one of his old workmates... turns out his mate got bitten by a dog a couple of weeks ago and after giving him his tetanus they took some blood samples to check everything was ok and that was on a Friday, by Monday they called him back in to tell him the results had shown up a problem and he has been given just 2 weeks left to live... unreal.. he says he feels fine and is still laughing and joking like he normally would, told my mate to hurry up because his time is nearly up and all that... only in his 40's as well.. How devastating is that..

Strange then that an innocuous incident can lead to no goal and yet blatant man handling of a player with zero intention of going for the ball is deemed ok.. that's the sort of thing they need to be tackling for me, holding on to players in the box is just as bad if not worse than any unlucky handball incident that may occur..

Agree with both points, on one hand it was an awful decision to disallow it for what it was as DDW pointed out that could have hit anybody or anything as that made it's way through so thought it was harsh especially as they would allow such blatant holding in the box and that was not even slightly questioned for what should have been a City penalty earlier in the game, On the other hand as Rando pointed out at least this way it's as clear as daylight now, touch the ball and it's scrapped simple as... harsh maybe but everyone will know where they stand and that won't change from ref to ref, game to game.. Overall City played well but were just not clinical enough for all their shots on goal and Spurs were..