God is Haaland

Vettel's car has bad balance as a consequence of the damage.

Wow, RIC is really lucky neither car got damaged.

Interesting tactics by Hamilton. But don't worry @Cannabis, the biased British stewards won't show Hamilton the black flag he should see.

Hahn!

Vettel provided slip stream for Kimi. What a great man.

Have fun with Sahin.

Vettel's WDC title chances just went down to 1%.

Cannabis is unable to respond as he's currently masturbating to it.

Kimi! Hamilton's pitstop looked insanely quick. What was the time?

Update: It's almost dried up now. Conditions that are perfect for inters perhaps. But there's not enough time for a tire change.

??? It's not exciting though, because the Mercs are untouchable in the rain. In the dry the top 3 teams are really close. Especially Ferrari and Mercedes are virtually equal in the dry with the exception of Monaco.

Hamilton will probably win Q3, because the Mercs are unbeatable in the rain.

You ought to enroll for an English class instead of wasting your time masturbating to your homosexual poster boy Lewis.

I love Britain.

Hey, welcome @AMG

There's more. https://archive.fo/CDBFf

I can't see how Renault could beat RB. Even if their engine was a little better - atm it's arguably a little worse - their aeropackage would be way inferior as long as Newey keeps on working for RB. At least RIC won't have to deal with Max anymore who receives preferential treatment.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9VCJ2o5x8vQ Clueless Hamilton fanboys will ignore this and continue denying the Mercs were much quicker in the rain.

If it had happened in a CL (semi-) final, it would have been a red for the opponent and a penalty for Madrid. @Teso dos Bichos will make excuses.

I don't claim that idpol is to be found exclusively on the left, but rather that given the demographical reality in countries like the UK, Germany and the US and a couple of other (minor) factors it is an obivous, strategical blunder for true progressives/liberals/egalitarians. Indeed, although inequality between the sexes, races, religous groups etc exists and needs to be dealt with eventually, class is still the most important parameter when it comes to inequality. Therefore - regardless of what the real reasons for the adoption of idpol by the establishment really are - I think it's important to realise that it's effectively a divide-and-conquer strategy. Men vs women, race 1 vs race 2 vs race 3 vs race 4, cis vs trans, hetero vs homo vs bi and all the religions against each other; there are so many ways to divide potential members of the egalitarian/progressive movement and make them fight each other instead of the establishment. And because of this annoying victimhood mentality it's only the disabled, 1/3-black, 1/3-hispanic, 1/3-asian, bi-/homosexual, islamo-jewish trans-women who will be allowed to criticise anything and take leadership. It sounds absurd, but it actually happened. In the US a secular movement was first turned into a feminist movement and after the feminist got rid of all the non-feminists, they started fighting each over whether homo-sexuals or trans-sexuals are more oppressed. The movement's size shrunk down to about 1% of the size from the time before the feminists started invading.

https://interactive.news.sky.com/brexitshifttabs.pdf

A woman owning $1.000.000.000 instead of $990.000.000 is more important than a man's life, because it's so important to help women to break the glass ceiling, while men make up the vast majority of homeless people and those who lose their lifes at their workplace doing jobs that are dangerous and have a permanent, negative impact on the health, but should not be paid better than the average office job according to feminists. (White) Men are the new Jews(scapegoats) in the media and inside the political establishment except for right-wing parties which are disgusting for other reasons. Ironically they blame the racism and sexism of the straight, white male for Brexit and Trump, when it's their reverse sexism, constant race baiting and reverse racism that lead to emotionally-driven, irrational acts of defiance. Perhaps my opinion of the population of the UK is too naive, but I don't think 50% of it is made up of racists and economically illiterate, right-wing morons. In my opinion a substantial amount of Brexit voters were angry protest voters who wanted to send a signal to the political establishment. Without the Rotherham scandal, which was the result of political correctness and the acceptance of false accusations regarding racism, remain would probably have won. Likewise in the US general elections Bernie supporters abstained from the vote or even voted for Trump, because the only noncorrupt candidate was eliminated by a plot between the DNC and the establishment media. I don't consider Bernie voters to be a racist, sexist bunch. If the left-leaning establishment keeps on throwing false accusitions(racism, sexism, etc.) instead of getting rid of their own extremist and nonsensical positions - and most of those stem from post-modernism(ie: a pseudo-scientific ideology based on envy) - they forfeit their right to be surprised when they lose against right-wing lunatics such as that tiny-fingered, ferret-wearing, cheeto-faced traitor.

My pants.