Lord sugar vs George Galloway

[MUFC]

 

[The Artful Dodger]

Galloway's commnets about the Champions League final were beyond the pale, he was deliberately conflating Jewsihness with Israel and assigning collective responsibility, in a country where anti-Semitism seems to mean anything or everything now, that was a genuine case of it and he was rightly fired. Galloway is easy to fall for if you're of the left, he makes passionate arguments about things easy to get behind but he's a narcissistic, unpleasant man with no principles, the fact he even took the gig at Murdoch's talkradio shows how much of a socialist he really is.

Alan Sugar may not be as a committed political man as Galloway, but he's equally repugnant. His clearly racist twitter post a few months back was laughed off as a joke but it was far worse than what Danny Baker did. He also comes across as very dim, any time I've had the misfortune of watching him on that terrible show the apprentice he seems like a man who struggles to express himself in anything but stupid exclamations. That's our country though, in love with wealth for wealth's sake, we revere those who make money and allow them carte blanche.

[ScoRoss]

Only ever been blocked by one person on Twitter and that is George Galloway.

I'm oddly proud of that.

[Inverted]

Two odious bastards.

Sugar is an economically and socially conservative cunt who thinks he has some kind of god-given right to be associated with the Labour movement because he's a facking Lahndan geezer or whatever.

George Galloway is a straight-up demagogue, bordering on fascist. 

 

 

[MUFC]

I like Galloway, he has said things people are afraid to say,. but this time he has come across as a right twat. Alan Sugar maybe be Jewish but in the past he has said things like Ariel Sharon should be done for war-crimes, so you can't accuse him of being bias.