Azeem

Honestly man if Western people develop the same kind of sensitivity about using certain labels that have some undertones about Muslims like they have about Jews it will massively improve the world. Although it's the guilt of Holocaust that is the reason for latter but let's hope it doesn't have to take another such incident. You see on this forum people using term like 'Islamist' casually which is entirely concocted term by Western warhawks. Every Muslim is an Islamist by definition, including me, anyone who believes in the ideals of Islam in their private and public life is. No no no Islamist=/ that Islamist are kinda like the bad guys the violent ones who want to take over. Nope that are coined labels used as euphemism to target Muslims without saying so.

Nope. Globalist is a term like terrorist even if it is loosely applied and whatever undertones it may have. Terrorist is also a very recent coined term. Insurgents and militants have existed for a long time but referring them as terrorist is few decades old. General perception of a terrorist is someone who causes senseless violence killing wantonly. But no one calls 'mass shooters' in US terrorist because it is coined mostly to complain about Muslims. But saying anyone using the term terrorist is to be ignored is a stupid statement.

Not really Globalism is a real academic term and than it has colloquial connotations as well. Like the word terrorism which more often than not has underhanded bigotry to refer to Muslims 'We need to stop terrorism' which you hear every Western govt official saying every now and then is just dog whistle for 'these fucking Muslims' But that doesn't mean terrorism isn't a thing

Because Mexico has their own country now. If US stole Mexican land leaving Mexicans as forever refugees without any country of their own one can bit the Mexicans would've been salty about it if not actively resisting till today.

Humans have mapped Mars to the detail of 5m, land on Earth to 50cm but Oceans only 1.5km.

Let's do a poll to settle this once and for all Who do you think is in the driver's seat in what is happening in Middle East and is about to happen ? A. U.S and its various actors, they only use Israel as a conduit for their own goals B. Israel, they use their lobby channels to make U.S follow policies that are even detrimental to America itself C. It's not that simple, both pursue their own goals which sometimes align sometimes don't like any geopolitics D. Who cares ? focus on bright sides of the world. Go and touch some grass

being in Top 5 is in leading pack

Saturday 19th October, 2024 Luton 0-2 Watford, 12.30 Athletic Bilbao 1-1 Espanyol, 13.00 Como 1-2 Parma, 14.00 Celtic 3-0 Aberdeen AZ Alkmaar 0-2 PSV, 17.45 Sunday 20th October, 2024 Seattle Sounders 2-2 Portland Timbers, 02.00 Wellington Phoenix 0-0 Western United, 04.00 Hull 0-1 Sunderland Leicester Women 3-2 Everton Women Nantes 1-3 Nice, 16.00

Daily Reminder the only two countries that opposed a UN resolution making food a human right were US and Israel

U.S is placing its own air defense in Israel indicating Israel's own much vaunted AD wasn't enough to stop the last missile attacks from Iran which were much more serious (stopping rockets made in basement is different from missiles launched without informing first)

Don't know Israel will attack Iran or not but they are currently invading Lebanon it's not much in news right now because it's not going exactly to plan. That's why they toned it down through euphemism like limited ground operation, if it works ha we invaded it but if it doesn't no no was never meant to invade just limited operation

Isn't this the one after which they applied the backpass rule bcz everyone was using backpasses negatively as fuck

RIP what was the cause ?