Administrator Stan 18,386 Posted October 25, 2020 Author Administrator Share Posted October 25, 2020 3 minutes ago, DeadLinesman said: Disgraceful decision tbf. The law was changed to keep the title on Merseyside. Just ask @LFCMadLad BUT EVERYONE IS AGAINST EVERYONE ELSE IF THE SHOE FITS! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LFCMike 3,009 Posted October 25, 2020 Share Posted October 25, 2020 47 minutes ago, Stan said: Just watching highlights. Liverpool seemed fortunate not to go behind further before their goal. Definitely miss the presence and organisation of Van Dijk. How come the handball by Robertson wasn't given? MOTD commentator mentioned there's been a change in the application to the handball rule. Other than the sleeve thing has there been another change? For the Sheff Utd penalty it looks like they'd have been hard done by because Fabinho just about gets a touch on the ball. You'd think that's something VAR would check - location of the foul but before that is it even a foul in the first place ? Salah's offside goal was sensational, shame that had to be disallowed but it was correct decision. Jota will be such a key player for Liverpool. Quality in depth might be the difference between some clubs and Liverpool surely have that. Sheff Utd did well but this wouldn't have been a game they'd be expected to win. Their kit is disgusting too. The co-commentator on my stream mentioned something about the expected position of the arm. Of course this is still entirely subjective but the fact Robertson is simply running along in that incident I assume his arm is in its expected position and he certainly didn't have time to react Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrator Stan 18,386 Posted October 25, 2020 Author Administrator Share Posted October 25, 2020 4 minutes ago, LFCMike said: The co-commentator on my stream mentioned something about the expected position of the arm. Of course this is still entirely subjective but the fact Robertson is simply running along in that incident I assume his arm is in its expected position and he certainly didn't have time to react I'd be genuinely curious as to seeing how that translates across other matches. I genuinely hadn't heard of that rule before this game/incident. Not a Liverpool slant, just genuinely want to know if that phrase comes about again in similar instances. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LFCMike 3,009 Posted October 25, 2020 Share Posted October 25, 2020 3 minutes ago, Stan said: I'd be genuinely curious as to seeing how that translates across other matches. I genuinely hadn't heard of that rule before this game/incident. Not a Liverpool slant, just genuinely want to know if that phrase comes about again in similar instances. Came in from the fourth game: https://www.premierleague.com/news/1849937 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeadLinesman 5,938 Posted October 25, 2020 Share Posted October 25, 2020 Happened in the City game as well. The attacker handled the ball before crossing to Antonio but it wasn’t given because of the new rules. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.