Guest Posted April 12, 2021 Share Posted April 12, 2021 Just now, Stan said: Yeah but tell us how you really feel... What? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 12, 2021 Share Posted April 12, 2021 @Rick you seen very aggressive and a bit of a know it all to me. Perhaps I'm wrong. If I am I'm sorry, maybe you are a nice guy. But that is the way I'm interpreting your posts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick 2,276 Posted April 12, 2021 Share Posted April 12, 2021 3 minutes ago, Gunnersauraus said: @Rick you seen very aggressive and a bit of a know it all to me. Perhaps I'm wrong. If I am I'm sorry, maybe you are a nice guy. But that is the way I'm interpreting your posts. Says the guy who it’s talking about VAR technology (that he has never used) as if it’s matter of fact. You have an answer for every point that people make, without actually having the absolute knowledge to dismiss opinions. I don’t particularly give a shit if you think I’m a know it all, or if you don’t think I’m a nice guy. You’re a stranger to me, so why you feel the need to state that sort of thing as if I am meant to care is beyond me. I’m here to talk about football, and share opinions. Your whole idea is to be a contradictory git; your track record of it shows. Now you’re on about the technology they have to use as if you just come out of the booth. You know fuck all to disregard the points that have been brought up to in this topic by some members, yet here you are with a flimsy argument. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 12, 2021 Share Posted April 12, 2021 1 minute ago, Rick said: Says the guy who it’s talking about VAR technology (that he has never used) as if it’s matter of fact. You have an answer for every point that people make, without actually having the absolute knowledge to dismiss opinions. I don’t particularly give a shit if you think I’m a know it all, or if you don’t think I’m a nice guy. You’re a stranger to me, so why you feel the need to state that sort of thing as if I am meant to care is beyond me. I’m here to talk about football, and share opinions. Your whole idea is to be a contradictory git; your track record of it shows. Now you’re on about the technology they have to use as if you just come out of the booth. You know fuck all to disregard the points that have been brought up to in this topic by some members, yet here you are with a flimsy argument. You really are a world class tosser. I've used points that have explained from ex referees that have knowledge of how it works. Unlike you who just assumes things. Looks like opinion of you was right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick 2,276 Posted April 12, 2021 Share Posted April 12, 2021 4 minutes ago, Gunnersauraus said: You really are a world class tosser. I've used points that have explained from ex referees that have knowledge of how it works. Unlike you who just assumes things. Looks like opinion of you was right. The video clearly shows that the ball is obscured by the player in front. So much so that it can’t be determined when the ball left his foot. The replays they VAR used to make the decisions don’t show the full picture, yet you want us to just accept that decision when it rules out a goal. Imagine it was Lacazette on the end of that pass, I think your tune would be a lot different. Fact is, the video they have to use doesn’t give a clear image so the decision should go in favour of the attacker. It’s a legitimate goal ruled out through complete ineptness. Also, stop taking everything so personal. I’m not trying to piss you off, but I just don’t buy your story. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 12, 2021 Share Posted April 12, 2021 Just now, Rick said: The video clearly shows that the ball is obscured by the player in front. So much so that it can’t be determined when the ball left his foot. The replays they VAR used to make the decisions don’t show the full picture, yet you want us to just accept that decision when it rules out a goal. Imagine it was Lacazette on the end of that pass, I think your tune would be a lot different. Fact is, the video they have to use doesn’t give a clear image so the decision should go in favour of the attacker. It’s a legitimate goal ruled out through complete ineptness. Mate seriously I said dont reply to me. Then I said sorry. Then it turned out you are the twat that I thought you were. Which means I'm not interested in what you have to say still. It's not rocket science Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrator Stan 18,394 Posted April 12, 2021 Author Administrator Share Posted April 12, 2021 Calm down, calm down... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 12, 2021 Share Posted April 12, 2021 Just now, Stan said: Calm down, calm down... I am calm mate. I just wont reply to his posts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick 2,276 Posted April 12, 2021 Share Posted April 12, 2021 1 hour ago, Stan said: Calm down, calm down... Bizarre. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 12, 2021 Share Posted April 12, 2021 Was watching ref watch on sky. Basically confirmed what I said that they are using the offside lines properly and as was agreed. So the refs in the ref room cannot give the liverpool and wolves goals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.