OrangeKhrush

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/02/02/football-fan-banned-gender-critical-posts-permier-league/#:~:text=One of the examples Newcastle,THE WRONG BODY When you struggle on the pitch, you should struggle off it as well and kowtowing to the premier League and the devotion to that losing battle, is not a hill to die on she will get millions in defamation, go woke go broke. It's pretty shameless behaviour just to panda to the gender brigade that demand acceptance of their reality. Open the chequebook she is going to get paid, I do hope the premier League is a co defendant and get taken for a ride.

I have gone through the labour party manifesto for 2024 and it seems based though I retain scepticism as the labour and Tories are different cheeks of the same arse. I find it strange that the supposed conservatives act like Biden's brigands and the labour is acting more like conservatives, secured borders, immigration controls and gang and lawlessness breakdowns on to of switching in England's power again and industry are definitely not liberal policy or not liberal policy of the last 10 years but I am happy to be proven wrong on this. The Tories will be battling with Reform UK at this rate.

The conscription thing is not going down to well, who would have though that a decade of denigrating the ethnic population then asking them to fight in your money making wars was ever going to go over well. Migrants, rainbow people, gender Nazis, Greenies, anarcho communists, time to use that diversity stuff to storm the beaches.

Despite Iran's perceived strength their military comprises of grossly inferior soviet era equipment that is dated, add in a dying economy you can't fight foreign wars if you cant supply your army. Their threat is proxy war and supporting terrorist groups however Iran's lack of support is mostly driven by an inability to make war against militaries that are superior. ISIS K is rapidly growing, they are essentially the Taliban who have a malevolent dislike for Iranians, they are just another destabilising factor along with a general public that is in a state of rebellion. If coalition forces move in numbers, there is nothing Iran can do to stop them, they will suffer the same fate Iraq did.

Winston Churchill a war criminal? this is quite a stretch, it should be quite insulting to any British person

war is an establishment ideal, the UK and US talking active drafting. Nancy declaring anyone that doesn't want to sign up to die for Ukraine a traitor. right now we can all see the plan, the NWO demands your fielty and in return you get to die so they can make money off your death. Iran may have nukes and so we need to attack, why do I get the nagging feeling that I've seen this movie before. As for Iran being a boogie Man, like Russia, they are poor and struggling against Isis K. Iran have absolutely no bite. I think civil insurrection is more likely than Iran launching any kind of military offensive. as for Benny, he won't even be in power by the time the war ends

credit to New Zealand and Australia laying a formal complaint against cricket south Africa for that David Teeger situation.

Part of why they hate Ten Hag is that he makes them run to much

He almost went their two years ago for like 20-25m then he had a good season and now the issue of his worth is a problem.

The issue is he is damaged goods, maybe Arsenal or Chelsea will take a chance on him but his attitude is leaving much to be desired. if he does this to man united he will do it to anyone.

Rashford has to be sold for anything now, the guy is beyond redemption now.

Strange move for Sunderland, knowing their chairman this will seem like a cash windfall.

role play: I enjoyed it, a husband and wife spice things up by planing a role play night only for things to take a turn and the wife's secret past makes things take a turn.

I was surprised nobody bought him in the summer, I like him

California is a powerhouse when considering GDP only, but GDP is not wealth, millions of low skilled jobs producing low revenue is not success. Insane taxation, zoning regulations, clear socio economic disparity and corruption is not great. But yes I agree the American political frame work needs a do over to comply with prevailing times.

The social welfare systems of a economy can only exist when the economy is capable of sustaining the population, that said social programs like assistance for elderly or veterans is fine, i have no issues with that, it is common in any capitalist system. What I don't like is unemployment benefits, or better put long lasting unemployment benefits, it encourages people to do nothing about their situation. In south africa we have unemployment benefits "UIF" but it is only for 4-6 months and is normally 45-60% of the persons last monthly salary. South Africa has a well regulated labour market, we have the Labour Relations Act (LRA) regulates fair labour practices, organisational rights and a dispute resolution mechanism. The Basic Conditions of Employment with Sectoral Determinations create minimum standards for fair employment requirements, the Employment Equity Act is predicated on fair labour practice based on socio economic requirements, it is probably the most irrelevant and harmful piece that has resulted in South Africa's brain drain. fair labour practices should be statuary set which creates the groundwork to avoid exploitative practices, eg in South Africa firing on the spot does not exist, for a dismissal to be fair it needs to be substantively and procedurally fair, substance relates to the nature of the offense and whether dismissal is an appropriate sanction over less onerous outcomes like progressive discipline. Procedure relates to process, every dismissal must follow a hearing, fair notice, affording the accused party time and access to records to prepare their case. In the event of dismissal we have Bargaining Councils that regulate a specific industry sector, or the CCMA which applies to whomever is not in a council oversite. In south Africa increases and bonuses are practically mandatory and South Africa is pretty well unionised for better or worse. Our labour sector is about the only real bastion that functions even though a functional system has shown up that the majority of our workforce is poor, much of that is free handouts, lack of accountability, brain drain caused by equity driven outcomes and our best leaving the country.

I am a bit late on the streaming service game, for many years I was stuck on Netflix and Showmax but Amazon is pretty good yet like netflix doesn't exactly have "everything" either. Anyways I watched this, didn't even know it existed until today and it was actually good, probably better than the last two Resident Evil movies done with Alice. It is some origin story mish mash between the events of Res evil 1 and 2.

failed government is not failed economy, america has a failed/ing government but the economy is far from failure

Libertarian economy is the state ensuring that the players in the market compete fairly to grow the economy, this means preventing the government and corporate entities overlapping with conflicts of interest. Preventing government officials from being directors or shareholders for starters would ensure democratic accountability.

the current system is no regulation, big corporate decide how the "unfree market" is run, prevent anyone playing the game and the politicians certify it after nice big wads of money are shoved in their pockets. Does socialism fix this, no as power rests in the beaurocratic class. In socialist systems the state owns everything and when the state owns everything the citizen is irrelevant, you are so dependent on the state they can get you to twerk for a pittance even if that means no term limits, permanent government and anyone who objects gets cut off, the record of socialism is hitting 1000 when it comes to failed states and aristocratic class ruling the roost.

the inquest needs to be individual to individual to find out why rather than blanket blaming a system, most problems are results of failed government and corruption/cronyism rather than the economic system. 9 out of 10 instances the culprit is a failing government, you fix the problem by eliminating the corruption and having better accountability standards. If you remove government enabling of corporate corruption you fix most of the problem, voting for a man that is part of the reason this is enabled and benefits from it is not fixing the problem

So a politician that does not see political affiliation, populism or prevailing current day but rather the economy as important should be President, it seems like the problem may be sensitive feelings blue or red.

Democratic socialism ie capitalism with benefits can only work when people have the chance to uplift themselves which won't exist In a technocracy predicated on corruption, you fix the corruption. You achieve this by preventing government/corporate overlap, when the government does what it should do and regulate free market where the little guy can move up. Current America is the product of politicians or establishment politicians profiting of corporates who control the market on the behest of the politicians that should regulate them.

Taxes,the civic duty of citizens, the higher portion of which comes from the higher earners

The general basis is a minority that gmhas feelings rather than looking at the reasons why that group is failing. You then have to look at why people from said group succeed while others fail to go even deeper into the problem and the end result is governments failing in their mandates not capitalism. So the solution is to take from the majority to create artificial equity? Or reverse democracy? People get paid their value of their worth, a chartered accounted who may be a CEO or CfO will get paid well because the success or failure rests on his or her decisions, while the front line staff offers very little income. the solution is skills upliftment or self employment which is rigged to fail anyway we are down to square one and your solution is punish others because of the lesser group