Subscriber Mel81x+ Posted October 18, 2020 Subscriber Posted October 18, 2020 That's some ridiculous stats at the end of the game. Palace had 1 shot on goal and Brighton had 19.
Subscriber Mel81x+ Posted October 18, 2020 Subscriber Posted October 18, 2020 2 minutes ago, The Palace Fan said: Well five games in and I cannot wait for this season to be over. This club is going absolutely nowhere under Roy Hodgson. You can be pragmatic but interesting. A status this man has shown no interest in achieving. Surely the club must also see the same and want to move on? What does Roy have going for him that keeps him there?
Dave Posted October 18, 2020 Posted October 18, 2020 1 minute ago, Mel81x said: Surely the club must also see the same and want to move on? What does Roy have going for him that keeps him there? I think Steve Parish is still traumatised from appointing Frank De Boer and seeing him play Andros Townsend as a right wing back.
Storts Posted October 18, 2020 Posted October 18, 2020 7 minutes ago, The Palace Fan said: I think Steve Parish is still traumatised from appointing Frank De Boer and seeing him play Andros Townsend as a right wing back. Although after years of Hodgson football I actually reckon Townsend would be a decent wing back now ha
Administrator Stan Posted October 18, 2020 Author Administrator Posted October 18, 2020 That Dunk tackle If someone was offside, is it still a red ?
Subscriber Dan+ Posted October 18, 2020 Subscriber Posted October 18, 2020 That game couldn't have been any more how I expected it to be.
Burning Gold Posted October 18, 2020 Posted October 18, 2020 2 hours ago, Dr. Gonzo said: Wtf was Dunk even attempting there?? Just making himself bigger mate. Opens up a can of worms to send him off for that in my opinion
Guest Posted October 19, 2020 Posted October 19, 2020 18 hours ago, The Palace Fan said: I think Steve Parish is still traumatised from appointing Frank De Boer and seeing him play Andros Townsend as a right wing back. Always a worry with a team like palace that they get relegated. No point in getting rid of him at the moment. Wait till the end of the season a massive risk otherwise.
Guest Posted October 19, 2020 Posted October 19, 2020 18 hours ago, Mel81x said: That's some ridiculous stats at the end of the game. Palace had 1 shot on goal and Brighton had 19. Yeah but Brighton only had 3 on target.
Guest Posted October 19, 2020 Posted October 19, 2020 18 hours ago, Mel81x said: Surely the club must also see the same and want to move on? What does Roy have going for him that keeps him there? The chairman isnt necessarily going to be looking at the style of football. Hes going to he looking at the table, risk vs reward etc. Palace have finished 14th and 12th in the last two seasons. Not amazing but decent for a side like them. Your unlikely to go down with hodson. Your also unlikely to get in the top half but its completely understandable why a chairman would want to keep him.
Subscriber Mel81x+ Posted October 19, 2020 Subscriber Posted October 19, 2020 14 minutes ago, Gunnersauraus said: Yeah but Brighton only had 3 on target. While thats true it also shows how Palace were comfortable sitting back instead of trying to attack a cause that could have gotten them a second goal and they did get one it just happened to be ruled offside. I thought they really only ever got going once Brighton had scored and tbf to Brighton they fluffed more than one chance to get a better shot on target, something that has plagued them from the start of this season.
Guest Posted October 19, 2020 Posted October 19, 2020 39 minutes ago, Mel81x said: While thats true it also shows how Palace were comfortable sitting back instead of trying to attack a cause that could have gotten them a second goal and they did get one it just happened to be ruled offside. I thought they really only ever got going once Brighton had scored and tbf to Brighton they fluffed more than one chance to get a better shot on target, something that has plagued them from the start of this season. No doubt brighton were the better team but it wasn't shot after shot like some have said
Subscriber Mel81x+ Posted October 19, 2020 Subscriber Posted October 19, 2020 57 minutes ago, Gunnersauraus said: No doubt brighton were the better team but it wasn't shot after shot like some have said I think towards the mid of the second half they really did have a pop at Palace. At times you'd see the ball get cleared and just rotate back to strike on goal too. As you said it wasn't a shower of shots on goal but at the same time Brighton were the side really trying.
Guest Posted October 19, 2020 Posted October 19, 2020 Just now, Mel81x said: I think towards the mid of the second half they really did have a pop at Palace. At times you'd see the ball get cleared and just rotate back to strike on goal too. As you said it wasn't a shower of shots on goal but at the same time Brighton were the side really trying. Yeah they were although they were 1.0 down. Brighton were definitely the better side though
Dave Posted October 19, 2020 Posted October 19, 2020 To be fair I wouldn't say I was ever concerned about Brighton scoring. They didn't really overwork Guaita at any point.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.