Mel81x

The fact that FIFA are trying to do this without UEFA leaves some hope it will never happen. It's going to undermine how the revenue stream covered by UEFA works and that's enough reason for UEFA to make this impossible.

https://rajithegame.com/ Spent some time playing this today and thought it was okay. Nothing to write home about, slightly clunky controls especially with the jumping but its out there and I think its playable and enjoyable in certain parts as well. They've got a lot to do to make it better and if you can get it cheap on Steam (during a sale) I think its a good purchase to kill some time.

Unfortunate there for Leeds. Meslier was having a good game too.

What exactly does Nelson Semedo bring to this Wolves side? He can't retain the ball and is terrible going forward.

Wow. What a goal that is. Thunderous strike.

@Dr. Gonzo whats the best expression/volume pedal you've ever used? Thinking of getting an EV-30 from Boss second-hand as a musician I know is selling it to make a quick buck.

Nice stop by the goalkeeper there.

From the two games I watched recently I'd agree with you. I was more talking about the kits because I got a stream link and I said what in the world is this.

Its available sometimes and its quite rare. There is a guy who used to import it regularly but then he told me that they stopped using it.

From afar if you asked me who was playing I'd have said Portugal were playing England.

Will be gone by next weekend. Replaced by some new horror VAR hasn't shown us yet.

Just to be clear my point of contention isnt the act post the offside and it being a red card/sending off/violent conduct which was the reason for VAR to be involved in the first place its the fact that the referee stops the game to have the incident reviewed as its a foul then waits for VAR to give the decision and should it not be an offside I still think the ref has to go to the screen to review the incident. I dont think they could ever have given Pickford a red for that incident and I really doubt they will ever go back on it personally in any shape or form as rule amendments but what I am saying is that any infraction in the box that can lead to a goal-scoring opportunity when its called by the ref for stop in play requires the guy on the pitch to go to a monitor and review the incident with VAR.

But the ref didn't make the offside call, VAR did. And, the game was let to go on and at that point the linesman hasn't raised his flag so the ref is literally going on what VAR is saying. Meanwhile, there is a foul in the box post the offside which no one is clear on until VAR review for the offside. The player is already receiving medical attention why not just jog up to the monitor have a look take a look while VAR does it analysis and everyone is on the same page? Just to be clear my point of contention isnt the act post the offside which was not the reason for VAR to be involved in the first place its the fact that the referee stops the game to have the incident reviewed as its a foul then waits for VAR to give the decision and should it not be an offside I still think the ref has to go to the screen to review the incident.

That's not what I mean. There is a foul in the box, you've heard VAR and as a ref because its a potential penalty that you haven't reviewed yourself you should be at a monitor just as much as I'd expect them to go there if the linesman doesn't raise his/her flag to go see the incident themselves which in this case happens to be true. This also doesnt mean Pickford should see red or that he should be sent off the pitch.

Damn I am dire here.