Jump to content
talkfootball365
  • Welcome to talkfootball365!

    The better place to talk football.

Terrorist Attack at London Bridge & Borough Market


football forums

Recommended Posts

He said that the threat of terror attacks are part and parcel of living in a big city, and that London and its citizens had to be prepared for such events, which is different than saying they need to get used to terror attacks.

The threat being constant is factual especially in the big cities. If London, or a major city wasn't ready and prepared for such events, then well... something would be deeply wrong. All the US major cities and the likes of Paris, Berlin and so on, evidently have plans and procedures to deal with mass causality crime, be it terrorism or not. It's not his fault that everything he says is at risk of getting demonized because of his religion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 206
  • Created
  • Last Reply
16 minutes ago, Spike said:

They can do whatever they please, if they wish to give lip service they are allowed to. 

This story is nothing. If they don't realise this after getting fucking stabbed and bombed and contort the truth to fit their fantasy world then this won't do a single bloody thing. You give people too much credit, most will do anything to bury their heads. Ban false-sympathy? It'll simply manifest in another manner.

Oh a lot of people don't realise this. Why do you think "not being scared" and "carrying on like nothing happened" while your countrymen's brain fragments and intestines are still being scraped off the pavement are extolled as virtues by the increasingly apathetic and suicidal Western European audience? Out of all the things, Saudis confirming they have 0 respect for us should be the last thing you need to get outraged about right now. I'm not talking about banning false sympathy: people can do as they please. I'm merely pointing out how retarded these meaningless gestures are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Think both Panflute and Cannabis are generally correct here. There definitely is a link between geography and when football decides it cares about innocent people dying but while that is a valid conversation you can't take the moral high ground by "giving them a taste of their own medicine" when it comes to a minute's silence for innocent dead people. It's not about people suddenly deciding they care about innocent people dying at that moment, it's specifically about the victims.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Machado said:

He said that the threat of terror attacks are part and parcel of living in a big city, and that London and its citizens had to be prepared for such events, which is different than saying they need to get used to terror attacks.

The threat being constant is factual especially in the big cities. If London, or a major city wasn't ready and prepared for such events, then well... something would be deeply wrong. All the US major cities and the likes of Paris, Berlin and so on, evidently have plans and procedures to deal with mass causality crime, be it terrorism or not. It's not his fault that everything he says is at risk of getting demonized because of his religion.

It's not even difficult to understand what he's saying but somehow that empty headed clown, Donald Trump, is convincing more and more people that letting your stupid side takeover is a sign of winning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Back to Saudi Arabia though, and this isn't about them not observing a minute's silence but more about how they're treated as great allies. A US official here beautifully responding to a question about Saudi Arabia recently and why Iran are the bad guys and Saudi Arabia are the good guys. xD

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Sign up or subscribe to remove this ad.


×
×
  • Create New...