Honey Honey 3,557 Posted December 7, 2017 Share Posted December 7, 2017 Why not us v Luton Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stan 15,570 Posted December 7, 2017 Share Posted December 7, 2017 why just 1 game...? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Honey Honey 3,557 Posted December 7, 2017 Author Share Posted December 7, 2017 There is probably so much resistance at the FA that they don't want to buy the equipment required to trial more than one game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Palace Fan 3,025 Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 The whole for seems like a farce already. Palace have released a statement effectively saying they do not agree with the game being a late kick off given the recent crowd trouble and why the attendance has been restricted from 4500 to 2000. We've had Police apologising for comments about offensive weapons being seen last time already and the match commanders after match statement has gone down like a lead balloon. Round two is going to be a circus. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 14, 2018 Share Posted January 14, 2018 Didn't see this game. Was the var used at all? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Honey Honey 3,557 Posted January 14, 2018 Author Share Posted January 14, 2018 46 minutes ago, Gunnersauraus said: Didn't see this game. Was the var used at all? I don't think it was. The commentator even said "it's a good thing we haven't had to use it in case there are any teething issues" ffs that is the whole point of a trial Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Blue 1,687 Posted January 14, 2018 Share Posted January 14, 2018 Glad the FA have finally listened to me Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stan 15,570 Posted January 14, 2018 Share Posted January 14, 2018 3 hours ago, Kitchen Sales said: I don't think it was. The commentator even said "it's a good thing we haven't had to use it in case there are any teething issues" ffs that is the whole point of a trial it was used for the Murray goal I think but didn't need a reversal of a decision. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.