Honey Honey Posted July 25, 2017 Author Posted July 25, 2017 58 minutes ago, Cannabis said: ManBetX sounds like a gay porn site where you can wager who cums first. I dare you to take that idea on Dragons Den Our sponsor, Fun88, sounds like a babestation type channel with 2 naked fat ladies
Subscriber Dan+ Posted July 25, 2017 Subscriber Posted July 25, 2017 I'm surprised ours isn't higher given it's our owners' sponsor.
Dr. Gonzo Posted July 25, 2017 Posted July 25, 2017 Just now, Dan said: I'm surprised ours isn't higher given it's our owners' sponsor. If I had a business that made me rich and then I bought a football club (that wasn't Liverpool), I'd probably want my business as the shirt sponsor as cheaply as possible.
Subscriber Dan+ Posted July 25, 2017 Subscriber Posted July 25, 2017 3 hours ago, Dr. Gonzo said: If I had a business that made me rich and then I bought a football club (that wasn't Liverpool), I'd probably want my business as the shirt sponsor as cheaply as possible. True, just wondered if was at all along the lines of Man City's owners sponsoring their stadium for a silly amount of money, for all ours aren't as wealthy as theirs.
Dr. Gonzo Posted July 25, 2017 Posted July 25, 2017 2 minutes ago, Dan said: True, just wondered if was at all along the lines of Man City's owners sponsoring their stadium for a silly amount of money, for all ours aren't as wealthy as theirs. Yeah but they're just a bunch of sad people who are making up for tiny penises by trying to own a football team that is successful.
Spike Posted July 25, 2017 Posted July 25, 2017 The type of people that get excited and talk about the aesthetics of a shirt sponsor on a jersey can pogue mahone. Lots of clowns complained about the switch from Samsung to Yokohama.
Dr. Gonzo Posted July 25, 2017 Posted July 25, 2017 29 minutes ago, Spike said: The type of people that get excited and talk about the aesthetics of a shirt sponsor on a jersey can pogue mahone. Lots of clowns complained about the switch from Samsung to Yokohama. The aesthetics of shirts could be improved if we went back to the days of not having shirt sponsors. The clubs would fucking hate that idea, because it means less money for them. Even the football club that is more than a club joined in on taking the devil's money in corporate shirt sponsorships. But it undoubtedly makes football kits look 100% classier. Arguing about which corporate logo looks better is a bit silly.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.