Bluebird Hewitt Posted August 27, 2020 Share Posted August 27, 2020 2 hours ago, ScoRoss said: Seems nothing has been learnt and nothing has changed. That's pretty much the EFL for you. You only have to look at what's happening now to see that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrator Stan Posted July 8, 2021 Administrator Share Posted July 8, 2021 Eight clubs hit with transfer embargoes https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/57760968 Derby, Reading, Hull, Fleetwood, Gillingham, Swindon, Oldham & Scunthorpe. Quote Derby, Reading and newly-promoted Hull are among eight English Football League clubs under transfer embargoes a month before the start of the new season. The embargoes limit a club's ability to make signings, with sanctions preventing transfer fees being paid. Fleetwood Town and Gillingham from League One have also been sanctioned. Swindon Town, already struggling with off-field issues, plus Oldham Athletic and Scunthorpe United are the three League Two teams under embargoes. The EFL have started publishing a list of clubs under embargoes following a change in regulations voted for by EFL clubs last month. Derby's embargo continues Having avoided relegation from the Championship on the final day of season and then again when the EFL decided not to appeal against a decision to only fine the club rather than deduct points for their accounting policies, confirmation of the embargo is a blow to Rams boss Wayne Rooney in terms of building a squad to challenge in 2021-22. Derby's on-going embargo will continue as the EFL states they have failed to comply with the following conditions: Regulation 16.2 - Failure to provide audited annual accounts Regulation 16.3 - Annual accounts not filed with Companies House Regulation 17 - Default in payments to Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs Regulation 51.2.3 - Default in paying transfer fee instalments Profit and Sustainability Rules - non-submission of audited accounts The club has until 18 August to fulfil the EFL's requirements to resubmit their accounts for 2016, 2017 and 2018 in the 'normal' way, knowing they will be charged if they breach profit and sustainability rules again. In addition, the clearing up of their recent dispute with the EFL, which saw them fined £100,000, now means they can submit subsequent accounts which had been delayed because of that case. At the opposite end of the EFL, Swindon, who are in the midst of an ownership wrangle the EFL described as "concerning" and have just seven first-team players, have also been placed under an embargo for several factors: Regulation 16.2 - Failure to provide audited annual accounts Regulation 16.3 - Annual accounts not filed with Companies House Regulation 17 - Defaults in payments to HMRC Article 48 - Non-payment to Football Creditors Rule 10.1 of League Two Salary Cap Management Protocol - Failure to submit SCMP Calculation Conditions under monitored loan agreement The embargo is a further complication of a troubled summer for Swindon, who were relegated from League One last season after winning the League Two title the previous campaign. The Robins are currently without a manager after John McGreal left after less than a month in charge, BBC Radio Wiltshire reported that the players and staff have not been paid for June and the club is also facing legal action by Swindon Borough Council over unpaid rent at the County Ground. Reading are deemed to have breached profit and sustainability rules, while Hull's embargo is based on "conditions under monitored loan agreement", as is that applied to Fleetwood, Oldham and Scunthorpe. These terms relate to loans which were made available to clubs in Leagues One and Two during the pandemic, which on application meant clubs had to agree to specific squad sizes and playing budget. Sheffield Wednesday have been released from their previous embargo, following relegation to League One. Under the EFL's operational rules surrounding embargoes, clubs do have some means of strengthening their squads "to protect the integrity" of the competition. Clubs are permitted to 'staff up' so they have 23 players of professional standing, which is termed as players to have made at least one appearance for any club in any first-team competition. If they have less than 23 players they are allowed, within a transfer window, to sign free agents on a maximum of one-year deals or bring in players on loan for up to half a season. However, clubs cannot pay loan fees for players and cannot pay additional wages on top of the salary the player receives at their parent club. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whiskey Posted July 8, 2021 Share Posted July 8, 2021 Mad how this is in full swing yet the Super League clubs got absolutely nothing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smiley Culture Posted July 8, 2021 Author Share Posted July 8, 2021 1 hour ago, Whiskey said: Mad how this is in full swing yet the Super League clubs got absolutely nothing. Didn’t they get fined the cost of a Mars bar or something in the end? Anyway, on the subject of rebel competitions, it’s mad that Football League clubs haven’t gone on their own or at least had a vote of no confidence in the current dickheads. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrator Stan Posted July 9, 2021 Administrator Share Posted July 9, 2021 Weak punishments, in my opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted July 9, 2021 Share Posted July 9, 2021 I imagine Derby County will just mysteriously find another 30 million from the ground sale previously unaccounted for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted July 26, 2021 Share Posted July 26, 2021 Just when you think the EFL couldn't be any more of a circus they've put Peter Ridsdale in a position of authority. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrator Stan Posted August 5, 2021 Administrator Share Posted August 5, 2021 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScoRoss Posted August 10, 2021 Share Posted August 10, 2021 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrator Stan Posted August 10, 2021 Administrator Share Posted August 10, 2021 I'd love for these kind of revelations to shatter the EFL to the core but I'm very skeptical of what will change. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smiley Culture Posted August 10, 2021 Author Share Posted August 10, 2021 As I said elsewhere, it’s not surprising in the slightest. Fans should be highly sceptical and not really supportive of financial investment from overseas, especially in the bottom two tiers of the Football League because what do these people want with football clubs? It’s little wonder clubs like Morecambe, Macclesfield, Orient, Swindon, Bradford, Oldham and Wigan are paying the price or have paid the price for such investment. It’s a real wonder why there’s investments in, on the whole, such small clubs. I remember at Orient there was something daft like ten businesses registered to an office in the oldest stand at the ground during the Becchetti era, including construction companies. It was clearly a front for something and something definitely not above board. The Football League will bury their heads. It’s their go to position. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.