Spike

my bartender tonight looks like wanda nara @Berserker

It doesn't take much brainpower to realise it's a very predatory business.

Too many dumb, stupid, young girls get into porn, film a few videos and get spat out of the industry. They'll use them up until they reach boiling point and can't say yes to an 'interracial gangbang with suspected gang members'. So many stupid girls.

I believe they did and even on the touchline

Smokes 80 a day and allows his synapses to synapse at a faster rate than a normal humans allowing for superior tactics. Literally to smart for football.

Fucken hell, I knew Benzema didn't like Barcelona but that is a little much.

Same to you ~

Also no argument for the fundamental tactical differences or similarities between ‘midfield aggressors’ and ‘holding midfielders’; just one word followed a punctuation mark and another dime-a-dozen condescending remark. Really riveting reading; makes the fellows at ‘the shed end forums’ proud. Reminds me of people pidgeonholing Essien as a holding mid as well.

Compelling argument. DIAHF

Contextless question?

Kante is a midfield agressor, it shows a fundamental misunderstanding of his talents and positional roles to think he can play as a holding midfielder. Well, he probably can but it would be like putting a leash on a gaurd dog and expecting it to protect your home.

Carry on, citizen

This tired debate again? About a day late to the party, as we are now talking about the actual movies themselves. Flog a dead horse.

I heard that Bond has no personality and goes off on violent rants about how much he hates women and how superior British engineering is to the rest of the world.

Nah, you are thinking of the Lazenby one (which is underrated as well). His friend is tortured to death in this one.

It's no masterpiece but it blew me away when I was a kid. I'd never seen Bond so violent. It's a revenge film about Bond trying to assassinate a drug lord.

Dalton's Licence to Kill was edgy, gritty, and dark nearly 20 years before Casino Royale did and it did it better on a slashed b-movie budget.

They are fine films but they are bad 007 films. Dalton did a better Craig than Craig.

That is impossible when all the Craig films exist.

Lazenby and Dalton were perfectly fine! It's popular to hate on them but time has been kind and their films are finally being seen for how good they actually are.

Well the films were successes but I prefer my Bond films with a little cheese. They are too serious and I think Daniel Craig is fucking goofy looking with those elephant ears and blond receding hair. Which ones are your favs? And who is your fav Bond? I think From Russia With Love is my favourtie film.

It doesn't matter anyway. The franchise is already dead. Fucking Daniel Craig and the new films aren't 007, they are English Bourne films.

Yeah but dude, one is fiction and the other is real and Mandela's ethnicity is key to his nature, not so much Bond. But I do know what you mean; people want authenticity, but there is a lot of hypocrisy.

Well I see him as white because all the actors have been so and the dude that he is based on is white as well. It's just an appearance thing for me, I'd be as jilted by a red headed Bond as a black one, or even an ugly white dude. You could say people are equally biased towards ugly people in films, haha. I don't see how anyone could not associate Bond with the traits I listed, because that is how he has been in the movies and novels. In fact I recall Timothy Dalton being the spitting image of some early sketches of what the character would look like. It's acting at the end of the day, pretending to be someone you aren't. In an enlightened society any actor or actress could play any character. Brad Pitt could be Malcolm X in blackface and Forrest Whittaker could be Winston Churchill in white face. But we aren't that enlightened society and we can't dissociate an actor with a character.