Devil-Dick Willie

This is @Beelzebub defending his homeland against the Indian invaders. 2024 colorized.

Mate a fucking house in Australia costs millions. And for the last fucking time ROCKETS AREN'T MISSILES. You make it sound like Pakistan just gave Ukraine the means to glass the fucking earth when in fact they gave them some 1960s 12 cm firecrackers.

Can't talk, Papua New Guinea just sent 6 AKs and a can of beans to Ukraine, I might be conscripted soon.

You're not worth mine either, as you refused to cover the most glaring point I made. That you're on your knees begging russia for oil and are about the closest thing to an ally they have right now. And yes, it's a financial war of attrition. (Remember the bit about india having double the population and 9x the GDP oh wait) And the supplies Nato and the US are giving the Ukraine are what's currently the decisive stratagem. Not fucking Pakistan . But whatever go do some burpies if you think you'll be conscripted bro. But if you aren't conscripted by the end of next year you owe the forum a full months donations.

Because boxing is as relevant as lawn bowls these days.

Hahahahaha You're comparing Pakistan delivering a few crates of ammo to Ukraine... to China delivering weapons to the anti western side of the war? What a joke. I know they did, and yes, there is a massive difference between the 2 sides without global intervention, and you'd have to be a fuckwit (or subject to a lot of nationalism) to see it. It's like me saying Australia vs China would be a fair fight hahahaha. India have an excellent army, they've folded you in the past, and would fold you again. Proxy war or not. You're too proud to see it. Sure, there is a non zero possibility that the world would cut India off to the extent that they've cut off russia, and you get bankrolled and supplied Drones, weapons platforms and missiles to the extent Ukraine has from the free world, but I doubt it. For many many reasons. Sure, there would be some hats thrown into the ring, but Pakistan vs India is not in the same stratosphere as Russia vs Ukraine.

I know more about WW2 especially than you ever will. Russia would barely notice compared to the PMs of every western nation visiting, and you sent ammo lol. Who cares. You're also pleading neutrality and begging the Russians for discount oil. So I'd say you have FAR better relations with russia than most nations. Pure speculation. Besides. India has WAY more troops, more money. They have double the military, 9x the GDP, and they already have as much shit from Russia as could be spared. You've lost every war to India, and it would be no different if the 2 nations duked it out, no matter if Russia aided India or not (or how fit super soldier Beelzebub became)

But I export more seed. You're in Pakistan bro. Calm.

I feel like a hero when I go for a run that's over 5 or 6ks. You're a machine. A Belgian friend of mine rode his bicycle up and down a local mountain until he hit 9800 meters of elevation, the equivalent of Mt Everest. Took about 13.5 hours of riding time and 15 hours overall. Absolute madman.

Yeah, I'm not a comic fan but I did hear that. Reflecting upon it more, I think the ponderous and clumsy first act, leading into a pretty ponderous 2nd act are what kills it from being the 'modern classic' some people think it is in my opinion. In addition, some of the music spots feel pretty gratuitous. The opening credits are fine, but the rest feel forced. Finally, on reflection, the villain is WOEFULLY underdeveloped. They went to huge lengths to expand on the background of every other character, including the comedian, who dies in the opening scene. But Ozi gets basically 2 scenes prior to the reveal. A short chat with Nighthawk and the assassination attempt scene. And he appears peripherally in 1 flashback. For a movie that goes well beyond 150 minutes this is pretty criminal. I definitely think it's a well acted and great looking movie. It just has so many large flaws holding it back.

Watchmen (2009) 7/10 Zack Snyder's 'masterpiece'. Or as close as he'll likely come. A very beautiful movie, full of great effects, costumes and sets (Which are the points most ZS movies win) However, unlike other Snyder movies, the narrative is compelling and well developed. It's not just a completely soulless spectacle. However, overly reliant on flashbacks, and the strings of plot are a often a little long and separate. In fairness they do tie in together pretty well at the end. I think if the direction was a little tighter and the narrative a little more streamlined, this would be a modern classic.

Hahahaha utter garbage from Australia. 8 fer 27.

You can absolutely overexpose the audience to titles. AEW, which really is one 2hr tv show when it boils down to it show has The AEW title The TNT title The all atlantic title The FTW championship Tag titles 3 man tag titles And 2 womens titles. This is in addition to regular appearances from ROH champions, and AEW wrestlers holding the ROH belts (FTR and jericho/cesaro) and AAA titles floating around too. That is a pile of dogshit. WWE is much cleaner. Each show has a championship, a secondary belt and tag belts. 1 womens title, and a floating female tag belt. That covers 5 hours of TV with 7 titles, whereas AEW has 3 hours of TV, 8 titles plus the ROH bullshit. Now if I were in charge of AEW, and I wasn't cooked on more coke and addys than Dave Portnoy, I'd have The AEW world heavyweight title A secondary belt (a US championship belt probably, naming it after the network feels tacky) Tag belts A single womens championship. And a rampage championship, that gets defended at least twice a month on rampage. It would be the 'workhorse' belt and give you an excuse to put random matches on almost every week. However, AEW currently just does that anyway so meh.

I don't mind the odd double title reign. But with both shows on separate networks with their own rosters, each needs a championship. Reigns has worked as double champ because he's had the storylines to go with it. If you had someone like a Brock as champ champ then you're kinda just fucked. People would either burn out seeing the same guy twice a week or would resent an absent champ (like Brock)

IMO the only way to resolve the WWE championship cleanly is to have sami get screwed at EC, but get a WM night 2 rematch. Cody beats roman night 1 for the belt of his choice (WWE championship) and Sami, with Jimmy Usos assistance, wins night 2. You split the belts, you get both babyfaces over.

Honestly to me it makes perfect sense that developing nations with hostile history with their neighbors are the most racist. It shouldn't even be close imo.

Absolutely. These 2 incidents happened to the same player 1 week after the other.

Rhianna is uglier than ever. Fuck that holding call at the end.

He looks like a school teacher, but someone has to replace megamind eventually.

Sharma needs to go big here for India to take the big advantage they need into the 2nd innings. A 50+ lead shoooooould do it imo but a 100 lead would be devastating.

He was cleared. Australian media just hates the indians because they keep winning. Old Nohit has been a phenom in his old age in tests. All the talent he always had, but with the temperament too.

I'm just surprised Heyman paid someone

He also raped someone in sydney yes.

He raped someone in the USA while he was on their roster. And yes, it's not their fault, and it's just an association thing, but fuck the 9ers.