Jump to content
talkfootball365
  • Welcome to talkfootball365!

    The better place to talk football.

Armando Broja - Chelsea to Fulham Loan Deal


Recommended Posts

  • Administrator
Quote

 

Wolves are considering a move for Armando Broja, whose future is likely to hinge on whether Chelsea sign a striker this month.

Broja will find himself with a decision to make if Mauricio Pochettino brings in another forward. The 22-year-old’s chances of regular football will be lower if the competition for places increases.

Broja led the line during Chelsea’s win over Fulham last weekend but had a frustrating game and was substituted in the 66th minute. He has been unable to build momentum since returning from a serious knee injury this season. After scoring the opener in Chelsea’s win over Preston in the FA Cup this month, he was on the bench for the 1-0 defeat at Middlesbrough in the first leg of the Carabao Cup semi-final last week.

The situation has caught the attention of several clubs. West Ham have long been admirers of Broja, whose contract expires in 2028, and Wolves have added him to their shortlist. Gary O’Neil, the Wolves manager, wants to sign a striker and has looked at a loan deal for West Ham’s Danny Ings. Although Broja has scored twice in 17 appearances this season, his potential was clear when he impressed during a loan spell at Southampton in the 2021-22 campaign.

The interest from Wolves is at an exploratory stage and it is unlikely they would be able to pursue a permanent deal for Broja. Their initial preference would be a loan with an option to buy in the summer. Several clubs are monitoring his situation and he has been targeted by Napoli and Milan in the past.

Broja is a product of Chelsea’s academy. Selling him would boost their financial fair play position. Money received for academy players goes down as pure profit in FFP terms.

 

https://www.theguardian.com/football/2024/jan/16/wolves-target-chelseas-armando-broja-as-pochettino-continues-striker-search?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator
1 minute ago, Devil said:

Chelsea seem to be willing to sell anything and anyone that has come through their academy now. 

Selling academy players counts as pure profit in terms of FFP, could be a main factor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Stan said:

Selling academy players counts as pure profit in terms of FFP, could be a main factor.

Yeah, I was reading about that the other day. Seems it's going to become the norm as long as this FFP is in place. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Devil said:

So strange, this comes off the back of Poch heaping praise on him. 

Chelsea seem to be willing to sell anything and anyone that has come through their academy now. 

You rather he publicly tell it how it is and say he's mid? 8 goals in ~2600 minutes.

He's more of an outside forward if anything vs a traditional #9, but he hasn't really impressed. Looks levels below. Coming back from a serious injury so not sure if he'll ever reach what was expected of him (joins the club with CHO and Reuben Loftus-Cheek). 

Unlike Gallagher, selling Broja wouldn't bother me. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, The Palace Fan said:

If Chelsea bring in a striker, it wouldnt surprise me if West Ham get Broja and we get Danny Ings on loan.

Danny Ings joining you guys hardly sets the pulse racing, especially at this stage at the tail end of his career.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • The title was changed to Armando Broja - Chelsea to Fulham?
  • The title was changed to Armando Broja - Chelsea to Fulham Loan Deal
37 minutes ago, Cicero said:

Off to Fulham on loan. No buy option. 

Really don't understand this football club. Why are we heading into the second half of the season with only 1 striker?

maybe you are going to splash on a osihmen or toney or callum wilson 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This had to be the worst January window of all time in terms of total fee and names moved.   Perhaps it is the sign that European clubs need to reassess the market and fix the taxflation and skulping issues plaguing the game.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator
2 hours ago, OrangeKhrush said:

This had to be the worst January window of all time in terms of total fee and names moved.   Perhaps it is the sign that European clubs need to reassess the market and fix the taxflation and skulping issues plaguing the game.  

Teams need to come in line with FFP or the Profit and Sustainability Rules. January usually is a month where it's quieter than summer, though.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Stan said:

Teams need to come in line with FFP or the Profit and Sustainability Rules. January usually is a month where it's quieter than summer, though.

 

I heard mark goldbridge saying something about Chelsea needing to raise 100m and some before 30 June or breach FFP, the problem is they have nobody of value left to sell outside of Gallagher and Broja.  

Back loading debt on amortisation was a stupid strategy and if it does bite them they deserve it.  

We could see Colwill, James, Gallagher, Broja, Masten, Hall all sold just to get out of financial trouble

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

football forum
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


Sign up or subscribe to remove this ad.


×
×
  • Create New...