Skittles Posted April 5, 2017 Share Posted April 5, 2017 You think maybe all the refs have got together for a pint of London pride but all they had left was Newcastle brown ale... So they've decided to piss of the Geordies as punishment for not getting thier favoured beverage? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Honey Honey Posted April 5, 2017 Share Posted April 5, 2017 Huddersfield 2 up now as well. Seems the ref didn't get the rules wrong but he did imagine up a foul out of nothing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Honey Honey Posted April 5, 2017 Share Posted April 5, 2017 GOAL RITCHIE HIS 15TH OF THE SEASON Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skittles Posted April 5, 2017 Share Posted April 5, 2017 finally... Almost feels like justice lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Honey Honey Posted April 5, 2017 Share Posted April 5, 2017 Official statement on what happened by the refereeing body... confirming that the officials did not know the rules. Remarkable at this level. I don't see how not knowing the rules is a lapse in concentration. They discussed it with each other for ages. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pig on the Wing Posted April 5, 2017 Share Posted April 5, 2017 2 minutes ago, HoneyNUFC said: Official statement on what happened by the refereeing body... confirming that the officials did not know the rules. Remarkable at this level. That's beyond ridiculous. Never mind, he'll get relegated to officiate in League One, because we're far more deserving of wank refereeing. Although, couldn't give a toss. Another away game, another Mark Beevers finish (5 in 5 aways), another clean sheet. Breathe it quietly, but... the Whites are going up... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rafa Beneathus Posted April 5, 2017 Share Posted April 5, 2017 I'm sure Roversgirl has been cheated on by a Geordie or something like that, she fucking hates us. "Rules are rules" haddaway and shite! Matt fucking Ritchie, some boy. Fuck off Keith Stroud you fucking shit named prick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rafa Beneathus Posted April 5, 2017 Share Posted April 5, 2017 I don't think there's any excuse for that mind, obviously it is annoying when refs fuck up but for offsides and penalty decisions you have to give them the benefit of the doubt as they don't have the benefit of technology like we do when we watch it back. However not knowing the rules, when it is so simple that your average Sunday League ref would know them is a joke. Ayoze Perez has came out and said he was being told at half time by one of the officials that there was a foul in the run up....bunch of inept useless cunts who shouldn't be given a game for the rest of the season. 4 of the dopey fucking spackers can't get a simple decision right. Good win though and thought we played well, was a comfortable display in reality. 11 points from 18 and we are up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Artful Dodger Posted April 6, 2017 Share Posted April 6, 2017 I actually think the rule should be what the referee made of it, if your own players are trying to cheat by encroaching then you should have the penalty taken away. If the defending team are trying to cheat by encroaching early then it should be taken again if saved, much like advantage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Honey Honey Posted April 6, 2017 Share Posted April 6, 2017 6 minutes ago, The Artful Dodger said: I actually think the rule should be what the referee made of it, if your own players are trying to cheat by encroaching then you should have the penalty taken away. If the defending team are trying to cheat by encroaching early then it should be taken again if saved, much like advantage. What would happen in cases like last night when 3 Burton Albion players were also encroaching? Do you leave it up to the ref to guess who went first? I think the current ruling is correct because otherwise it would make a total chaotic mess of situations where more than 1 team is encroaching and put huge unnecessary weight on referees. Based on the encroaching rules at present then last night had we scored or missed it should have been retaken because both teams were doing it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Artful Dodger Posted April 6, 2017 Share Posted April 6, 2017 You'd go with advantage to the attacking team, as you would with fouls outside the area. It's blatant cheating and teams shouldn't be rewarded with a second chance. It'd stop it dead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrator Stan Posted April 6, 2017 Author Administrator Share Posted April 6, 2017 14 minutes ago, HoneyNUFC said: What would happen in cases like last night when 3 Burton Albion players were also encroaching? Do you leave it up to the ref to guess who went first? I think the current ruling is correct because otherwise it would make a total chaotic mess of situations where more than 1 team is encroaching and put huge unnecessary weight on referees. Based on the encroaching rules at present then last night had we scored or missed it should have been retaken because both teams were doing it. 6 minutes ago, Cannabis said: Rock Paper Scissors between the two captains. keepy uppy challenge or cross bar challenge. only goalkeepers allowed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danny Posted April 6, 2017 Share Posted April 6, 2017 So we beat Leeds 2-0, easily the better side. Garry Monk says, and I'm paraphrasing, "they started well and were the better team, they made us pay. Had we of scored a goal it would have given us the chance to change the game, but we couldn't. Then Brentford won, no excuses". He repeated that about three times, three times mentioned how Leeds could have come back had they of scored but didn't, and then says no excuses, before going back to how Leeds could have come back and scored. Which one is it Garry? No excuses, or we could have won it had we of scored? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrator Stan Posted April 6, 2017 Author Administrator Share Posted April 6, 2017 that's not really an excuse, though? He's saying if they score, it might have been a different game. an excuse would be to blame it on the pitch, the weather, the ref, young players, the kit, the tea lady, the chef and then slowly morph in to Jose Monkinho. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rafa Beneathus Posted April 6, 2017 Share Posted April 6, 2017 It isn't an excuse, it is however staying the fucking obvious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subscriber Dan+ Posted April 6, 2017 Subscriber Share Posted April 6, 2017 On 4/5/2017 at 11:47 PM, Cannabis said: Full credit to the PGMOL for releasing a statement though, this is what us fans need going forward. Mistakes will always happen but having an apology is at least showing that the referee's have accepted their error and hold their hands up. It is but I think the actual statement in a nutshell is why it doesn't happen often. It's utterly piss poor from the officials and the Football League that they didn't know the rules. There are mistakes but this is just plain incompetence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Honey Honey Posted April 7, 2017 Share Posted April 7, 2017 I think they only released a statement in order to clear up the rules. Otherwise they would have said nothing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.