Devil-Dick Willie

Meanwhile king virat can't get a ton 

7 hours ago, The Palace Fan said:

@Devil-Dick WillieIs Wrestle Kingdom worth a watch?

Battle of Belts was pretty meh compared to Hard to Kill.

Worst Wrestle kingdom I've ever seen. A mix of the new owners booking, which has been meh, and the crowds not allowed to speak.

Night 1
ZSJ & Taichi vs Goto & Yoshi Hashi
Shibata vs ??? In a catch wrestling match ( I won't spoil why)
Desperado vs Hiromu 
Shingo vs Okada 

Night 2 
Naito vs Cobb
Kenta vs Tana 
Okada vs Ospreay 

These are the matches worth watching. There are a few other matches that aren't bad, but fuck me, even last years WK was significantly better. 

They had a match, it wasn't great, they had 2 more, neither of them were brilliant either. 

8 hours ago, Gunnersauraus said:

From what I heard it wasnt his fault was it though. They were told not to upstage reigns and lesner weren't they? 

That's a BS story. 

59 minutes ago, RondónEFC said:

Murray has had a way better career than Wawrinka but won't be remembered as a part of the big four historically. What's more telling is someone being rattled enough to bring that up unprovoked the best part of a decade since it was relevant .

On Djokovic, it's now come out he did a photoshoot with L'Equipe two days after he 'tested positive for Covid' as well as the awards event thing.

You're at least grounded in reality. Yes, Murray was better than Stan, which I have already stated that saying they are equal is a wind up. But he was So far behind the other 3 it's not funny. Both on the court and in the cabinet. If Murray was from a country that wasnt a western power the big 4 would never have existed. 

12-9 justifies my earlier comment. They're MUCH more similar than Murray to the 3 actual all time greats. 

20 minutes ago, Spike said:

If you are a stats guy Murray winning % is much closer to the big three’s, than Wawrinka’s is to Murray’s. Big3 sits around 82%, Murray at 76%, and Wawrinka at 63%. Out of context yeah, but how many of Murrays losses are exclusive to Federer, Nadal, and Cuntface? 

Stan had a shorter peak than Murray. That is all. 

36 minutes ago, Spike said:

Murray played in twice as many finals and has won over 13% more of his matches. Murray is closer to Djokovic, Nadal, and Federer, than Wawrinka is to Murray

Lost in twice as many finals. 

While I do believe the 'big 4' is a myth that wouldn't have existed if say, Del Potro replaced Murray. Your 2nd comment I must STRONGLY disagree with. Stan the man with his 2 titles is MUCH MUCH MUCH closer to Murray with his 2 titles than Murray is to the 3 guys who've won 10 times as many titles. Give your head a wobble. 

And as per usual, the "Goat" nowhere to be found to close out a game on day 5. 

Adelaide vs SA, Faf bats 400 balls, draws the match, keeps the series 0-0, then South Aftrica frog stomp Australia at the wacca. 
Headingly, Stokes tears the house down, lyon can't even complete a regulation run out and England win the game, end up drawing the series. 
Sydney and Gabba vs India last season. The draw, then win for india turn the series around to a 2-1 win. 
Now he costs Australia the clean sweep. 

These are just the ones that matter off the top of my head. I'm sure there are a few Australia have won where Lyon had 2fer or worse on day 5. 
 

Don't let the recent debacle distract you from the fact that there never was a big 4. 

Andy Murray = Stan Wawrinka. 

Crawley plays for spin
Root loves to have a feel 
Beers with every ball 
A beach balls on the field. 

Linkin park 2001

Head averages in the 40s, Harris has been a constant failure. It's a no brainer. 

4 minutes ago, Spike said:

The only thing wrong with Khawaja is his age, but even so he could probably play for five more years

Hussy only started around that age. Usman looks to be in his prime. 

The commentary box of Hussey, Waugh and Julian, all conspiring to drop Khawaja. 

33 minutes ago, Gunnersauraus said:

Has aj been under used by wwe though? I mean surely a wrestler  like him should be headlining wrestlemanias on multiple occasions? 

Backstage rolls would be good I agree but a bit of nostalgia would be nice to see for me. 

Ironically AJs big Mania match was a fucking boring dud. 

2 minutes ago, Gunnersauraus said:

Lol. Why? Its  nostalgic. As long as it's only on rampage it's not taking away any chances for young talent 

Living in the past has killed WWE. And that was with legends of their time (Goldberg, Undertaker ect)

2 minutes ago, Gunnersauraus said:

I think it would be quite nostalgic to see road dog and Billy Gunn wrestle together again now road dog has been released. Doesnt have to take up alot of air time 

@The Palace Fan @6666 @Devil-Dick Willie

Stop. 

He's got very very rotund hasn't he. 

3 hours ago, Spike said:

 

 

However he is actually quite proactive and thoughtful when it comes to the laws of the sport. Loved the idea of suspending captains if they couldn’t keep up the over rate. they’d instantly cut out the mucking around. 

 

I hate the idea of suspending captains for slow over rate, as they're only partially in control. 

Personally, I think adding 3 runs per over missed is the go. 

1 minute ago, Toinho said:

Jesus and he was still dropped?! 
 

It’s a shame Mark Waugh isn’t a good commentator etc, he was one of my favourite crickets growing up  

He's a sour old cunt. And was leading the anti Usman charge. "He should have been out for 28" Waugh when Usman scored 100. 
Meanwhile Warner got dropped twice, had a missed run out easy chance and was a hero for his 90 in the first test. 

1 minute ago, Spike said:

how many innings

7

Someone tell the wretched old cunt that landfills are bursting, land is being poisoned or cleared en masse and this house can't hold 10 billion people for long. 

4 hours ago, Gunnersauraus said:

@The Palace Fan  @Devil-Dick Willie apparently aj styles has signed a new contract with wwe. Which is a shame  because I would of loved him in aew. 

He wrestled in TNA for years and years. He's done the 'alternative' thing. Let the man make his millions. 

4 hours ago, Spike said:

Does Usman open as well? I thought he looked slick in his role in the middle order. Harris was improved this innings. Just sucks that Labuschange and Khawaja couldn’t build a QLD parntership

He averages 90 at opener. 

6 hours ago, Spike said:

I was initially annoyed Kwahaja was brought in but only due to his age and I am not a scout. 120

I've always been a big fan. I have a mate whos a bit of a right winger, 2 actually, and the way Usman has been treated throughout his career has taught them both that institutional racism exists. Every time he fails, a thousand articles are written about how he looks "lazy" and "not bothered" And then he's replaced by a square jawed idiot who scored half the runs and inevitably Usman is put back in. Bancroft, S Marsh, Handscome, Burns, Harris. It's all the same story. 
When he scores 100 lazy and uninterested becomes "cool" and "collected" of course. 

Even today that utter cock licker Mark Waugh was harassing him for "scratching around, getting lots of 1s" It's called building an innings and rotating the strike you fucking plonker. A bunch of ex players already come out saying "yeah, 138 is cool, but I wouldn't drop Harris, his 30 was good in tough conditions" 

Cunt, if his 30 was good, then whats Khawajas 130? And Harris averages 24. Let it go.