Subscriber nudge+ Posted May 6, 2022 Author Subscriber Share Posted May 6, 2022 Ok, next one. What is the highest number of triangles you can form by drawing only three triangles? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrator Stan Posted May 6, 2022 Administrator Share Posted May 6, 2022 9 minutes ago, nudge said: Ok, next one. What is the highest number of triangles you can form by drawing only three triangles? 18. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subscriber nudge+ Posted May 6, 2022 Author Subscriber Share Posted May 6, 2022 Just now, Stan said: 18. Nope Show the picture, too! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrator Stan Posted May 6, 2022 Administrator Share Posted May 6, 2022 4 minutes ago, nudge said: Nope Show the picture, too! Spoiler I got the answer learning from a TV show 1 Percent Club, shown on TV a couple weeks ago. This is the best image I can find to replicate it There's obviously one big triangle. Then from the top point a smaller triangle to around a third of the way down, and then from the same top point another triangle going 2/3rds of the way down. While looking at that, I've just realised that the triangles can be shaped differently inside the larger triangle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subscriber nudge+ Posted May 6, 2022 Author Subscriber Share Posted May 6, 2022 3 minutes ago, Stan said: Hide contents I got the answer learning from a TV show 1 Percent Club, shown on TV a couple weeks ago. This is the best image I can find to replicate it There's obviously one big triangle. Then from the top point a smaller triangle to around a third of the way down, and then from the same top point another triangle going 2/3rds of the way down. While looking at that, I've just realised that the triangles can be shaped differently inside the larger triangle. Tbh, you can do much better than that! And the idea is to draw three separate triangles - they can be inside each other of course, but it should still be 3 distinctive triangles Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrator Stan Posted May 6, 2022 Administrator Share Posted May 6, 2022 8 minutes ago, nudge said: Tbh, you can do much better than that! And the idea is to draw three separate triangles - they can be inside each other of course, but it should still be 3 distinctive triangles The first 3 pictures on the top row are the separate distinctive ones! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subscriber nudge+ Posted May 6, 2022 Author Subscriber Share Posted May 6, 2022 4 minutes ago, Stan said: The first 3 pictures on the top row are the separate distinctive ones! I think I need more sleep, because I still don't get it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subscriber RandoEFC+ Posted May 8, 2022 Subscriber Share Posted May 8, 2022 I kinda tried but not that hard . I think this is only 18 too but because I drew it on my phone I can't be sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subscriber nudge+ Posted May 8, 2022 Author Subscriber Share Posted May 8, 2022 6 minutes ago, RandoEFC said: I kinda tried but not that hard . Hide contents I think this is only 18 too but because I drew it on my phone I can't be sure. You're on the right path, just move the 3rd triangle inside to the outside in a similar fashion like the other two, and you'll get 30. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subscriber nudge+ Posted June 19, 2022 Author Subscriber Share Posted June 19, 2022 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devil Posted February 16, 2023 Share Posted February 16, 2023 On 20/06/2022 at 00:16, nudge said: 2? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subscriber nudge+ Posted February 16, 2023 Author Subscriber Share Posted February 16, 2023 1 minute ago, Devil said: 2? Correct... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
N U F C Posted February 16, 2023 Share Posted February 16, 2023 12 minutes ago, Devil said: 2? Fancy explaining it? I honestly can’t make a head or a tail of that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devil Posted February 17, 2023 Share Posted February 17, 2023 Took me about 2 minutes to figure it out, if you look at the first group of numbers it = 6 so I basically quickly realised each number had its own value. If you look through the chart there is series of numbers with a value of zero so we know all the 7's for example = 0 then we see all the 9's = 4 so the value of 9 = 1. You can then also see 0 has a value of 1. Based on that I knew that 8's value must be 2 because to make the total 6 on the first line. The last sequence of numbers has a value of 2 because the only number with a value is the number 8 0 = 1 1 = 0 2 = 0 3 = 0 4 = 0 never comes into it the code 5 = 0 6 = 1 7 = 0 8 = 2 9 = 1 I explained that badly I know but I see the solution quickly but explaining it written isn't my strongest point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subscriber nudge+ Posted February 17, 2023 Author Subscriber Share Posted February 17, 2023 5 hours ago, Devil said: Took me about 2 minutes to figure it out, if you look at the first group of numbers it = 6 so I basically quickly realised each number had its own value. If you look through the chart there is series of numbers with a value of zero so we know all the 7's for example = 0 then we see all the 9's = 4 so the value of 9 = 1. You can then also see 0 has a value of 1. Based on that I knew that 8's value must be 2 because to make the total 6 on the first line. The last sequence of numbers has a value of 2 because the only number with a value is the number 8 0 = 1 1 = 0 2 = 0 3 = 0 4 = 0 never comes into it the code 5 = 0 6 = 1 7 = 0 8 = 2 9 = 1 I explained that badly I know but I see the solution quickly but explaining it written isn't my strongest point. You explained it well, but there's actually a much simpler pattern there - just count the "holes" in the shapes of the numbers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderator Tommy Posted February 17, 2023 Moderator Share Posted February 17, 2023 My first thought was "No, thanks" as always when I see numbers, but when I read the solution I realised how easy it is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrator Stan Posted February 17, 2023 Administrator Share Posted February 17, 2023 2 hours ago, nudge said: You explained it well, but there's actually a much simpler pattern there - just count the "holes" in the shapes of the numbers Ironically, this is my reaction trying to solve it AND after seeing the solution Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devil Posted February 17, 2023 Share Posted February 17, 2023 5 hours ago, nudge said: You explained it well, but there's actually a much simpler pattern there - just count the "holes" in the shapes of the numbers So does that make my solution more impressive Never even considered the number of holes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.