Jump to content
talkfootball365
  • Welcome to talkfootball365!

    The better place to talk football.

Solve it


football forum

Recommended Posts

Sign up to remove this ad.
  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Administrator
9 minutes ago, nudge said:

Ok, next one.

What is the highest number of triangles you can form by drawing only three triangles?

18. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator
4 minutes ago, nudge said:

Nope :) Show the picture, too!

 

Spoiler

I got the answer learning from a TV show 1 Percent Club, shown on TV a couple weeks ago.

This is the best image I can find to replicate it



triangle-comp-1580337173.jpg?resize=768:

 

There's obviously one big triangle. 

Then from the top point a smaller triangle to around a third of the way down, and then from the same top point another triangle going 2/3rds of the way down.

While looking at that, I've just realised that the triangles can be shaped differently inside the larger triangle.

 

Ill Get Back To You Reggie GIF - Ill Get Back To You Reggie Diggstown -  Discover & Share GIFs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Subscriber
3 minutes ago, Stan said:

 

  Hide contents

I got the answer learning from a TV show 1 Percent Club, shown on TV a couple weeks ago.

This is the best image I can find to replicate it



triangle-comp-1580337173.jpg?resize=768:

 

There's obviously one big triangle. 

Then from the top point a smaller triangle to around a third of the way down, and then from the same top point another triangle going 2/3rds of the way down.

While looking at that, I've just realised that the triangles can be shaped differently inside the larger triangle.

 

Ill Get Back To You Reggie GIF - Ill Get Back To You Reggie Diggstown -  Discover & Share GIFs

Tbh, you can do much better than that! And the idea is to draw three separate triangles - they can be inside each other of course, but it should still be 3 distinctive triangles :) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator
8 minutes ago, nudge said:

Tbh, you can do much better than that! And the idea is to draw three separate triangles - they can be inside each other of course, but it should still be 3 distinctive triangles :) 

The first 3 pictures on the top row are the separate distinctive ones!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Subscriber
4 minutes ago, Stan said:

The first 3 pictures on the top row are the separate distinctive ones!

I think I need more sleep, because I still don't get it xD 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Subscriber
6 minutes ago, RandoEFC said:

I kinda tried but not that hard :ph34r:.

 

  Hide contents

 

20220508_235346.jpg

 

I think this is only 18 too but because I drew it on my phone I can't be sure.

 

You're on the right path, just move the 3rd triangle inside to the outside in a similar fashion like the other two, and you'll get 30.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 7 months later...

Took me about 2 minutes to figure it out, if you look at the first group of numbers it = 6 so I basically quickly realised each number had its own value. If you look through the chart there is series of numbers with a value of zero so we know all the 7's for example = 0 then we see all the 9's = 4 so the value of 9 = 1.

You can then also see 0 has a value of 1. Based on that I knew that 8's value must be 2 because to make the total 6 on the first line.

The last sequence of numbers has a value of 2 because the only number with a value is the number 8

0 = 1

1 = 0

2 = 0

3 = 0

4 = 0 never comes into it the code

5 = 0

6 = 1

7 = 0

8 = 2

9 = 1

 

I explained that badly I know but I see the solution quickly but explaining it written isn't my strongest point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Subscriber
5 hours ago, Devil said:

Took me about 2 minutes to figure it out, if you look at the first group of numbers it = 6 so I basically quickly realised each number had its own value. If you look through the chart there is series of numbers with a value of zero so we know all the 7's for example = 0 then we see all the 9's = 4 so the value of 9 = 1.

You can then also see 0 has a value of 1. Based on that I knew that 8's value must be 2 because to make the total 6 on the first line.

The last sequence of numbers has a value of 2 because the only number with a value is the number 8

0 = 1

1 = 0

2 = 0

3 = 0

4 = 0 never comes into it the code

5 = 0

6 = 1

7 = 0

8 = 2

9 = 1

 

I explained that badly I know but I see the solution quickly but explaining it written isn't my strongest point.

You explained it well, but there's actually a much simpler pattern there - just count the "holes" in the shapes of the numbers xD 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator
2 hours ago, nudge said:

You explained it well, but there's actually a much simpler pattern there - just count the "holes" in the shapes of the numbers xD 

Ironically, this is my reaction trying to solve it AND after seeing the solution

giphy.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, nudge said:

You explained it well, but there's actually a much simpler pattern there - just count the "holes" in the shapes of the numbers xD 

So does that make my solution more impressive 🤔 

Never even considered the number of holes. 🤣

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


Sign up or subscribe to remove this ad.


×
×
  • Create New...