OrangeKhrush Posted June 19, 2023 Share Posted June 19, 2023 https://talksport.com/football/1471598/newcastle-chelsea-transfer-marc-cucurella/ I am not sure about this but it may be worth a shot offering him a way out the firepit. 30m is one hell of a knock down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrator Stan Posted June 19, 2023 Administrator Share Posted June 19, 2023 Chelsea seems to be the death of players that have potential or do well at 'lesser' clubs and then move there for big fees. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cicero Posted June 19, 2023 Share Posted June 19, 2023 Think this is dependent on what the club do with Hall/Maatsen. At 30m I doubt the club will sell and take that much of a hit on FFP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OrangeKhrush Posted June 19, 2023 Author Share Posted June 19, 2023 2 minutes ago, Cicero said: Think this is dependent on what the club do with Hall/Maatsen. At 30m I doubt the club will sell and take that much of a hit on FFP. judging by how they are trying to fleece everyone in Mount, Havertz and dropping rejects like Pulisic on anyone not regarded a "big club" indicated desperation to sell. I heard something about 110m needed by 30 June or they are a bit fucked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cicero Posted June 19, 2023 Share Posted June 19, 2023 10 minutes ago, OrangeKhrush said: judging by how they are trying to fleece everyone in Mount, Havertz and dropping rejects like Pulisic on anyone not regarded a "big club" indicated desperation to sell. I heard something about 110m needed by 30 June or they are a bit fucked. It depends on how much validity this June 30th deadline is. I think the club have weighed the risks to determine that copping a sanction now is better than copping one later. The real pain in UEFA's FFP comes in the 2025-26 season, where club spending will be hard capped to 70% of total revenue. So, maybe we've decided to go for it now while spending is still soft capped, drum up commercial support and remain competitive when the hard caps come into play. 1. Either the club stick to their poker game in the belief United and Arsenal will cave and pay closer to the clubs asking price for Mount + Havertz (on top of Kovacic to City and Saudi Clubs getting our Muslim players.) to accommodate FFP. 2. June 30th is a soft deadline and the club is laxed about getting deals done. 3. Club weighed the risks and will take a sanction hit now vs in 2026 where regulations will worsen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cicero Posted August 26, 2023 Share Posted August 26, 2023 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whiskey Posted August 26, 2023 Share Posted August 26, 2023 He's an abysmal footballer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redcanuck Posted August 26, 2023 Share Posted August 26, 2023 26 minutes ago, Whiskey said: He's an abysmal footballer. Wasn't he better at Leicester? I thought he was. Must have been something about him for Chelsea to buy. I would take him at United on loan with an option to buy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrator Stan Posted August 26, 2023 Administrator Share Posted August 26, 2023 6 minutes ago, Redcanuck said: Wasn't he better at Leicester? I thought he was. Must have been something about him for Chelsea to buy. I would take him at United on loan with an option to buy. *Brighton Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redcanuck Posted August 26, 2023 Share Posted August 26, 2023 18 minutes ago, Stan said: *Brighton Right. Sorry about that. Still thought he was a better player before he got to Chelsea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrator Stan Posted August 26, 2023 Administrator Share Posted August 26, 2023 22 minutes ago, Redcanuck said: Right. Sorry about that. Still thought he was a better player before he got to Chelsea. Agreed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluebird Hewitt Posted August 26, 2023 Share Posted August 26, 2023 1 hour ago, Whiskey said: He's an abysmal footballer. Better or worse than Michael Keane? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cicero Posted August 26, 2023 Share Posted August 26, 2023 1 hour ago, Redcanuck said: Wasn't he better at Leicester? I thought he was. Must have been something about him for Chelsea to buy. I would take him at United on loan with an option to buy. 1 hour ago, Redcanuck said: Right. Sorry about that. Still thought he was a better player before he got to Chelsea. I think in Brighton's compact system he does well. He's a good player if you want someone who is good at retaining the ball and can play out from the back. As a defender though he is pretty poor. Flat footed all the time. Think United will be better off staying away but hey they spent 60m on Mount and gave him a 300kpw deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OrangeKhrush Posted August 27, 2023 Author Share Posted August 27, 2023 man United doesn't seem like a logical fit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whiskey Posted August 27, 2023 Share Posted August 27, 2023 10 hours ago, Bluebird Hewitt said: Better or worse than Michael Keane? Michael Keane isn't a footballer mate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted August 30, 2023 Share Posted August 30, 2023 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.