Jump to content
talkfootball365
  • Welcome to talkfootball365!

    The better place to talk football.

Danny

Member
  • Posts

    12,700
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    14

Everything posted by Danny

  1. Gotta say Ive been impressed with the turnaround at Leicester by Rodgers. 9 points off of 5th and 12 points off of 4th. Obviously Champions League qualification seems out of the question but a Europa League finish would be a good turnaround
  2. Haha no I didn't, #7 is a right midfield number and with Declan Rice being a left sided midfielder I'd assume Southgate would play Grealish on the right and Rice on the left lol
  3. I read somewhere by a City journalist that Grealish has played in a left sided centre mid role for City this season. Yeah I've no idea how we'll play but the numbers are interesting
  4. Numbers have been released... Maguire looks certain to start, obviously squad numbers don't dictate the starting eleven but that does read like he might lean to a 4-3-3 at some point. Pickford Walker - Stones - Maguire - Shaw Grealish - Bellingham - Rice Sterling - Kane - Rashford
  5. id go back 4 too but I feel Southgate will go for a back 3 and work at a consistent formation rather than changing it around seeing as we have no warm up games. Bellingham and Rice dont have to play as DMs, both can be much more offensive. Bellingham specifically can play as an attacking midfielder. Personally I dont think Foden suits the England team in its current iteration, purely based off of his form for England. At City he plays in a team that creates more space and has players like Gundogan, de Bruyne, Rodri and Bernardo who can all find a pass to feed Foden. When Foden plays for England there really isnt anyone that can feed balls through to him and neither is there the movement around him that allows him to exploit space. For me this has been a problem for Foden throughout his international career so far and the reality is that even though hes been great for City, hes never really been much more than average for England. Sterling on the other hand stretches the game, creates space for others and is able to exploit an opposition defence when theyre in transition. Sterling is fundamental to how England play and the success that we have had, would be a bad move to drop him imo.
  6. Knowing we will most likely play a back 3 I’d like to see the below go out. Feel like you could chuck Trippier in as hes been great this season but I’d still rather Trent. Not a lot of options at centre back, the back three is lacking in pace but ive had enough of Kyle Walker at centre back, open to see him playing right back though. Midfield is cut and dry, Phillips not fit enough to start otherwise id have him over Rice. Maddison has to start imo alongside Kane and Sterling. Pickford Trent - White - Dier - Stones - Shaw Rice - Bellingham Maddison - Kane - Sterling
  7. You can't regularly play South Africa, New Zealand and Australia if you're a northern hemisphere side in a competition, the nature of Rugby is similar to Cricket in that regard. So you play test matches instead, friendlies don't really exist.
  8. Considering his physical condition there’s no reason why he can’t play at this level for another 3-4 years at least and with his contract running out this Summer now is the time for him to move. Not sure Arsenal will still want him with the options they have going forward now. Wouldn’t surprise me if Spurs went in for him though.
  9. Moura's hattrick against Ajax proved he has the big game mentality that Spurs need
  10. Lucas Moura should without doubt be starting ahead of Richarlison
  11. Danny

    Boxing

    I thought Baumgardener should have but I can also be a terrible judge of boxing lol.
  12. Danny

    Boxing

    What a fight and what a night at the o2. A million times better than a stadium fight. Marshall and Shields were phenomenal, as were so many more of the women in there. What a legend Alvarez is, see the joy when the fight was over and she got to celebrate fighting at such a big occasion. Massive.
  13. Mount and Maddison aren't really in competition with each other, Mount is picked for his ability to act defensively in a midfield 3. Maddison doesn't have that and so isn't in contention as a midfielder.
  14. That was sort of my point, he prefers players who can attack from the wings rather than just centrally.
  15. Wouldn't disagree with the bold tbh, but it's brought him relative success so he'll stick with it. One thing I'd say is Maddison benefits a lot from being in front of Ndidi and Tielemans, both players are better than any options we have in the national team and Tielemans especially can actually play as a more deep lying playmaker, England doesn't really have that at all. I don't see why Maddison couldn't play behind a two up top and still have the defensive solidity behind him, but unless he can play multiple positions (some defensively) like Saka for example, it seems to come down to whether or not Southgate prefers Maddison over Foden/Grealish/Rashford/Sancho etc.
  16. Grealish really faded out of that game, lost his head and got a silly yellow too.
  17. Have been saying this for a while and it’s why Maddison doesn’t make the team. Our best centre mids are either best at tackling, carrying the ball or a Jack of all trades, but no one is a stand out passer of the ball who can dictate play and unlock defences. Because of this our midfield needs to be defensive and behind them even more because creativity has to come from the wing backs rather than through the middle.
  18. So we’re just disputing factual statements now
  19. Us getting beaten by Belgium twice was a big talking point of the World Cup. We were all aware Germany were not the Germany of previous years. Southgate took us from being a side that couldn’t get past a group stage or past Iceland to a side that beat those teams and we all enjoyed that a lot because supporting England is mostly a shit experience. You are also forgetting that in the build up to the Euros, Southgate was heavily criticised and was up until the Scotland game. The limitations he imposed on the team were obvious, but he’d then managed to get us to a final which is a nice experience so we decided not to get angry at him. A very normal reaction. You only see Southgate’s tenure and the fans reaction in black and white, but the truth is that at the World Cup when he took over we knew we were shit, we were just happy to be winning football matches because the tournament before we got knocked out by Iceland. At the Euros vs Scotland most fans were annoyed with the style of play, the annoyance wasn’t born out of a surprise as if we had believed we were amazing, it was just a natural shift from the positivity of the previous tournament as we’d all watched Southgate’s England struggle to be anything other than direct and void of creativity in the time between those two comps. What we are now seeing is a further build up of that. There is no “gotcha” moment that you crave, even if we’re average or shit were not going to be dwelling on that when after decades of failure we have managed to reach a semi and a final. No one expects England to be world beaters, so we’ve enjoyed the ride whilst it lasted and all we can hope is that Southgate can pull a rabbit out of that hat, however that looks increasingly unlikely as if we make it out of the group stage we will have to play much tougher KO games than in previous tournaments.
×
×
  • Create New...