Redcanuck

Wasn't passing judgement one way or the other, just saying they didn't terminate his contract. I doubt they could have legally terminated his contract. The mutual consent was over him not playing for United and United said they would work on finding another team for him to play for. Since no team offered to buy him, a loan was the only option. Not sure what will happen at the end of this loan period, since I believe he will be a free agent.

BBC saying Getafe are only paying a small portion of his salary, so United must be paying the bulk of it, unless Greenwood is willing to take a massive pay cut.

No grounds for termination, especially with Richard Arnold saying he was innocent of all charges. He still has a contract of £75,000 a week for another year at least, might be two. There were talks with Getafe about who was going to pay his salary. Unless Greenwood is willing to accept a lot less money, it wouldn't surprise me if United are paying a sizeable portion of his wages, because I don't think Getafe pays those type of salaries.

So Everton hasn't scored a goal this season but sell their only striker that's really played this season. They better hope Beto can get the job done or Calvert-Lewin stays healthy.

That could of been a penalty. Hand ball by Ward Prowse?

If it's really £200 m, Liverpool have to take it. FSG are an investment company after all, makes no sense to turn it down. £200m could get you Mbappe, maybe even in January.

Fred was sold to Fenerbache for around £10m

I believe Requilon was well thought of when Spurs bought him. There were a number of United supporters who said United should have been in for him. Maybe he will revert to his previous form in Spain under ten Hag. United need help on the back line with they injuries and Maguire losing whatever form he had. So I will take him.

Don't understand. Punched what?

True but if there is no money there, not a lot they can do. Supposedly only have or allowed to spend £100m and they have already spent that.

I am hearing no loan fee. Allows United to bring Amrabat I presume.

Probably not, but I have a number of friends who are Celtic fans. It is about as easy as a draw as they could have got.

Not straightforward for United to get out of their group, will be a tricky trip to Istanbul. Newcastle will struggle, but could get out of the group. I also like Celtic's chances, could not have gotten a better draw.

18 22

Friday 1st September, 2023 Luton 1-2 West Ham, 20.00 Saturday 2nd September, 2023 Sheff Utd 1-1 Everton, 12.30 Brentford 2-1 Bournemouth Burnley 1-2 Tottenham Chelsea 2-0 Nottm Forest Man City 3-0 Fulham Brighton 1-1 Newcastle, 17.30 Sunday 3rd September, 2023 Crystal Palace 1-0 Wolves, 14.00 Liverpool 2-2 Aston Villa, 14.00 Arsenal 2-1 Man Utd, 16.30

Can't believe Chelsea actually drew a decent opponent, would have put money on them getting Lincoln or Sutton. Newcastle/Man City is a shame this early , would have made a good final.

Since there hasnt be much to smile about regarding United so far this season, it would put a smile in my face if he does leave in the next week.

Excellent penalty kicks by Fulham against Spurs. Fulham where the better team throughout, so justice served.

Brentford please

12 27

Spanish Football Federation to sue Hermoso for her comments about Rubiales who they say is telling the truth about the incident.

Right. Sorry about that. Still thought he was a better player before he got to Chelsea.

Wasn't he better at Leicester? I thought he was. Must have been something about him for Chelsea to buy. I would take him at United on loan with an option to buy.

Awful late penalty, was it justifiable? Asking on behalf of my Wednesday supporting relatives in Sheffield.

Sterling the difference, might just be the best I have seen Sterling play for Chelsea.