-
Posts
12,330 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
65
Everything posted by Honey Honey
-
England National Team Discussion
Honey Honey replied to carefreeluke's topic in International Competitions
The best bit is a week ago Mason Greenwood was saying how he's level headed I'm not sure I want to know what shape penis that is. -
Manchester City Discussion
Honey Honey replied to a topic in Premier League - English Football Forum
Foden has a gf as well. What a cunt. -
Manchester City Discussion
Honey Honey replied to a topic in Premier League - English Football Forum
Mahrez and Laporte have covid. -
Newcastle United Discussion
Honey Honey replied to a topic in Premier League - English Football Forum
Our full strength team just lost 5-1 in a behind closed doors friendly against Middlesbrough wtf -
Newcastle United Discussion
Honey Honey replied to a topic in Premier League - English Football Forum
-
FC Brentfjord - Official Premier League Topic
Honey Honey replied to Danny's topic in Premier League - English Football Forum
Fee is likely higher because we are getting £1.5m of this rising to £3m. -
Leicester City Discussion
Honey Honey replied to Stan's topic in Premier League - English Football Forum
With the deadline 4 or 5 games into the season I reckon some clubs are waiting to see what they can get away without doing. -
Newcastle United Discussion
Honey Honey replied to a topic in Premier League - English Football Forum
Kept us up last year. That being said Darlow has the ability to do a good enough job, but as a team we'll have to be better than the one that relied on Dubravka last season. With no new centre forward and Gayle now out for months I just don't see it. Ashley spent the £17m he got from the Saudi's buying up stock in other companies I'm afraid. Free transfers and loans only according to Bruce. -
Healthy people don't wfh to protect themselves. Wfh is to prevent spreading the virus. It's not all about the individuals personal risk. Statistically wfh supresses community spread which aids in lowering the risk of those who cannot wfh. Risk isn't equal so increasing the risk for everyone because of that inequality is self defeating. Phased management using good quality data seems wiser than getting Pret back open tomorrow in central London when fiscal decisions can mitigate issues Pret have. You fill restaurants. Was there a spike? No then open the next thing. Spike? No, open the next thing. Spike? Yes, hold, pause or reverse and so on. Fiscal and monetary policy can be used to allow for that strategy.
-
I have nowhere said we would bounce back no problem. I am arguing that it isn't a case of needing to all go back immediately or else. I see no good case for the all or nothing economic argument put forward. Fiscal and monetary policies can be considered to buy time and aid in phased return. They provide options to consider in conjunction with the virus impacts and risk mitigation. There are serious risks to chancing it with rising case rates among the healthy. Most notably that it is exactly what caused the second massive jump in deaths in the US. The "healthy" take the virus back to the unhealthy and the unlucky. The current phased management approach with offices slowly returning is a risk aversion strategy fiscal and monetary policy has the tools to support if used correctly
-
Story about middle class people working from home at a company in London someone I know works for. About 6 weeks ago the boss demanded everyone go back to the office or be sacked. The boss got covid. Killed his dad. Now in hospital on a ventilator. Office shut again.
-
Nothing in there about the current or potential fiscal options to address sandwich shops lack of or non-existent revenue. It's not get back there or else. That's the point. There are actually options to choose from. I posit this is more about an underlying attitude about the virus and not because of any actual economic detail that goes any deeper. Back in January and February you led the posts playing down this virus, blaming red tops and calling it just like any other flu. 41,433 UK deaths later you're here plugging the line that the potency isn't as bad as early conservative figures. I suspect a connection. The econony is almost a get out of jail free card for the kind of attitude that shafted the west in the first place.
-
What capacity are we at now? Based on what?Why 75%? What does that actually mean? Who does that benefit? What sectors? What industries? What are the fiscal alternatives for those sectors? What are the monetary requirements and options for the sectors credit lines in varied scenarios? What shape is that sectors forecasted recovery in varies scenarios? How long can any fiscal or monetary policy hold in that sector before needing a new round? I never said worrying about the economy is liberatarian. Its the idea of what the economy needs that I said is libertarian. The reason it is mainly liberatarians is because they are the group whose philosophy overrides bothering to go into detail.
-
Also, the notion that if you're healthy it's fine is wrong. My 59 year old mother was perfectly healthy. She has barely been able to walk for 5 months. An estimated 500,000 people in the UK have long term complications from COVID. The vast majority were never in need of hospitalisation. What's the economic ramifications of letting healthy people get fucked and their friends and relatives then cautiously withdraw from a libertarian society? You end up right back where you started from but with opinion polls going crackers.
-
The economics is quite complex. If we're to open up for that sake I'd hope it's based on analysis of monetary policy and central banking tools rather than a hunch that everything will be a disaster.
-
Were they over 50? It's mainly young people I see not wearing masks. Like it is uncool to wear a mask or their makeup will get smudged on their way out so they won't wear one. Next generation as rampantly individualist as any, the planet is fucked
-
Full recovery for myself thanks.
-
Did teachers rank subjectively?
-
Lol fucking hell. That means unless the algorithm has some other individual level variable data to take into account it has randomised who gets put down when all else is equal.
-
London is the 2nd biggest French city in Europe
-
France has been added as well and they're going to put the UK on their list in retaliation I love how bitter French culture is.
-
Why didn't teachers get to do appealing before kids got results?
-
It's not uncommon in London for grad roles to set minimum A levels needed to apply. It's like a revised way snobs used to say "redbrick uni grads only" to try and keep the state educated people out without an HR lawsuit.
-
Thought it was 36% of grades downgraded which is massive. Are those 36% spread across 14% of kids? I don't envy those who have to make the decision because there's no method that works. Maybe the better thing was to have everyone get what they wanted and a cultural and CV write off of that year with employers and universities doing their own weighting. The lesser evil being everyone's grades are treat as a joke rather than some people feeling massively wronged.
-
Basically at the same phase many others companies have already reached? Just with the added Trumpism. Some analyst somewhere (lol) said the risk is that they dish this out outside of trials and it backfires then the anti-vaxxer cause will grow in numbers and resistance to all other covid vaccines.