LFCMike Posted October 17, 2020 Posted October 17, 2020 4 minutes ago, Rick said: He has, but do you not think that his lack of closing down crosses into the box has become an issue? It’s very easy for wide players to get a ball in when up against him, he doesn’t make much of an effort to stop it. Not saying he can't improve and he does need to defensively but ripping it all up and moving him into midfield isn't the answer either
Guest Posted October 17, 2020 Posted October 17, 2020 5 minutes ago, LFCMadLad said: Maths has no business being in football. Its game, not a fucking University class. I knew you'd get it
Rick Posted October 17, 2020 Posted October 17, 2020 1 minute ago, LFCMike said: Not saying he can't improve and he does need to defensively but ripping it all up and moving him into midfield isn't the answer either Fair enough. Yes, he is only 22 but he has been in the first team for three years, he should have improved defensively a lot faster than he has.
The Artful Dodger Posted October 17, 2020 Posted October 17, 2020 As for the game itself. Really enjoyable, I thought we might be on for another of these ridiculous scorelines (which for some reason people seem to think are good for the sport) with the early goals but it settled down into a good match. Liverpool look so slick with Thiago in there, they should have scored more than they did. Van Dijk is a major worry though, if he’s out for any length of time could they be in difficulties? Manchester City like to whinge that Laporte’s absence cost them last year but Van Dijk would be a colossal miss. Everton weren’t really at the races for the first half, lots of misplace passes and lack of ideas. Very good result though, still unbeaten and a sign of resilience.
Storts Posted October 17, 2020 Posted October 17, 2020 Just awful officiating again. Pickford should have gone for his horror tackle. Robertson should have gone for his petulant and dangerous kick out. Winner should never have been disallowed. Just a shambles
Storts Posted October 17, 2020 Posted October 17, 2020 28 minutes ago, LFCMike said: Richarlison is one of the biggest cunts in the league btw So is Robertson to be fair. As bad as each other
LFCMike Posted October 17, 2020 Posted October 17, 2020 4 minutes ago, Storts said: So is Robertson to be fair. As bad as each other Absolutely but he's our cunt
Storts Posted October 17, 2020 Posted October 17, 2020 1 minute ago, LFCMike said: Absolutely but he's our cunt Completely fair
LFCMike Posted October 17, 2020 Posted October 17, 2020 6 minutes ago, Storts said: Just awful officiating again. Pickford should have gone for his horror tackle. Robertson should have gone for his petulant and dangerous kick out. Winner should never have been disallowed. Just a shambles Was there any evidence of that. The replays seemed far too quick to judge that after he was fouled by Mina and they didn't show any clearer replays of it
The Artful Dodger Posted October 17, 2020 Posted October 17, 2020 Robertson is a beast, learnt it all at Hull.
LFCMadLad Posted October 17, 2020 Posted October 17, 2020 12 minutes ago, Gunnersauraus said: I knew you'd get it To be fair you are probably in the 1% of nutjobs that think that goal was correctly ruled out. Football should never be judged on millimetres, its a game ffs. Anyway, I dont really need to go into it all again because anyone with a brain the size of an ants knacker can see the whole VAR system from top to bottom has ruined the game.
Storts Posted October 17, 2020 Posted October 17, 2020 1 minute ago, LFCMike said: Was there any evidence of that. The replays seemed far too quick to judge that after he was fouled by Mina and they didn't show any clearer replays of it Yeah the replays weren’t great for it but for me I think it was quite clear he knew what he was doing. Annoyed by the foul. Also the feigning injury afterwards is usually a pretty good sign ha. Not out of character either
Guest Posted October 17, 2020 Posted October 17, 2020 3 minutes ago, LFCMadLad said: To be fair you are probably in the 1% of nutjobs that think that goal was correctly ruled out. Football should never be judged on millimetres, its a game ffs. Anyway, I dont really need to go into it all again because anyone with a brain the size of an ants knacker can see the whole VAR system from top to bottom has ruined the game. If you cant understand how maths can prove if someone is offside there is no point in debating you. If you cant understand how a goal being disaload for being millimetres offside isnt a var problem but a rule that maybe needs to be looked at there is no point debating you. If you cant understand that the rules are the rules whether we like them or not there is no point in debating you.Overall there is no point in debating you
LFCMadLad Posted October 17, 2020 Posted October 17, 2020 4 minutes ago, Gunnersauraus said: If you cant understand how maths can prove if someone is offside there is no point in debating you. If you cant understand how a goal being disaload for being millimetres offside isnt a var problem but a rule that maybe needs to be looked at there is no point debating you. Overall there is no point in debating you Thats good then. Its was a goal and the whole VAR system should be scrapped. If we are going to start using millimetres and maths to judge decisions then the game is dead.
Rick Posted October 17, 2020 Posted October 17, 2020 2 minutes ago, Gunnersauraus said: If you cant understand how maths can prove if someone is offside there is no point in debating you. If you cant understand how a goal being disaload for being millimetres offside isnt a var problem but a rule that maybe needs to be looked at there is no point debating you. If you cant understand that the rules are the rules whether we like them or not there is no point in debating you.Overall there is no point in debating you Mate, you don’t even know the difference between an elbow and a shoulder.
LFCMike Posted October 17, 2020 Posted October 17, 2020 4 minutes ago, Storts said: Yeah the replays weren’t great for it but for me I think it was quite clear he knew what he was doing. Annoyed by the foul. Also the feigning injury afterwards is usually a pretty good sign ha. Not out of character either Not saying he didn't but the replays didn't show any evidence of it. The foul could have simply carried him in to Allan (I think it was)
DeadLinesman Posted October 17, 2020 Posted October 17, 2020 8 minutes ago, LFCMadLad said: Thats good then. Its was a goal and the whole VAR system should be scrapped. If we are going to start using millimetres and maths to judge decisions then the game is dead. But millimetres are judged whether a ball is over the line or not
Guest Posted October 17, 2020 Posted October 17, 2020 8 minutes ago, LFCMadLad said: Thats good then. Its was a goal and the whole VAR system should be scrapped. If we are going to start using millimetres and maths to judge decisions then the game is dead. Ridiculous comment
Guest Posted October 17, 2020 Posted October 17, 2020 Just now, DeadLinesman said: But millimetres are judged whether a ball is over the line or not I know you are only fishing but you are right
Guest Posted October 17, 2020 Posted October 17, 2020 7 minutes ago, Rick said: Mate, you don’t even know the difference between an elbow and a shoulder. The fact that you have to bring up a wording mistake shows you have lost the argument. Even one of your own fans admitted it.
Rick Posted October 17, 2020 Posted October 17, 2020 1 minute ago, Gunnersauraus said: The fact that you have to bring up a wording mistake shows you have lost the argument. Even one of your own fans admitted it. Nah, you mentioned arms and hands in other posts you made. You got the offside rule wrong, which @Cicero pointed out. You came in here saying some ludicrous shite, and have now piggybacked on to other members who have actually made decent arguments.
DeadLinesman Posted October 17, 2020 Posted October 17, 2020 For what it’s worth, it’s offside by the absolute letter of the law IF it’s been judged to have been the shoulder offside. However, it’s fucking stupid and football was never meant to be judged like this. For me, VAR was originally meant to assist with massive issues of offside when it was clear and obvious. If you can’t look at a still for 5/10 seconds and can’t judge, then for me it’s too close to call and you should move on. Defenders are getting away with it, whilst attackers are effectively being punished. It’s wrong on every level and does make a mockery of the game. However, it’s the rules and referees at fault, not the actual technology of VAR. I’ll keep saying this over and over again. Don’t get rid of VAR, get rid of the fucking stupid way in which it’s being used.
LFCMadLad Posted October 17, 2020 Posted October 17, 2020 13 minutes ago, Gunnersauraus said: Ridiculous comment So you think maths should be used in decision making in a game of football? Fuck me.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.