Jump to content
talkfootball365
  • Welcome to talkfootball365!

    The better place to talk football.

Fulham 0-1 Tottenham - Thursday 4th March, 2021


Recommended Posts

  • Administrator
Posted

Kick-off 18.00

Live on BT Sport

1200px-Fulham_FC_(shield).svg.png      VS     e6df9075f2a3dca8eda72d87d90cf4f6.jpg

Recent Form
Fulham - DWDWD
Tottenham - WWLWL

Last 3 Meetings
13/01/2021 - Tottenham 1-1 Fulham
20/01/2019 - Fulham 1-2 Tottenham
18/08/2018 - Tottenham 3-1 Fulham

  • Replies 20
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted
3 hours ago, Steve Bruce Almighty said:

Sissoko you owe us for getting us relegated last time :ph34r:

Don’t expect much from us 

  • Administrator
Posted

New lease of life for Alli? Seems to be making a few more appearances now. 

Posted

What's up with Jose, is he ok?

Kane, Son, Bale and Alli starting together? Couldn't quite believe it when I saw that line up.

  • Administrator
Posted

How the hell has Kane not scored?

Such a free header. Fulham defence all over the place.

  • Administrator
Posted

Fulham's defence goes totally missing again and they break with Son crossing for Alli to tap in, think it took a deflection in on the way. 0-1.

  • The title was changed to Fulham 0-1 Tottenham - Thursday 4th March, 2021
  • Administrator
Posted

Just about to say how much Fulham were shitting themselves whenever they got close to Spurs' goal and then Maja scores.

  • Administrator
Posted

This surely can't be disallowed?! How the fvck is that fair? Lemina's hand is by his side?!

Posted

Nonsensical decision. 

The handball had no causitive effect in leading to goal, since it was going to hit him anyway at the exact same spot. 

A confused application of an already stupid rule. 

  • Administrator
Posted
2 minutes ago, Inverted said:

Nonsensical decision. 

The handball had no causitive effect in leading to goal, since it was going to hit him anyway at the exact same spot. 

A confused application of an already stupid rule. 

The application was fine. It's the rule dictating everything there. Different for attackers and defenders and therefore totally unfair. The causative effect etc has no say in how the rule works. 

If it hits a defender like that, it's not a penalty. So why should the same benefit not be given to attackers considering Lemina's 'silhouette' hadn't changed.

Posted

Yeah, I didn't understand the handball call either. Lemina literally had the ball blasted at him, unbelievable call and just another issue rife in the game that needs addressing really. It's tough enough watching goals disallowed for imaginary lines. 

For all Fulham's positive play mind, you can see they miss that genuine bit of quality where it counts. A lot of huff and puff but nothing to show for it.

Looks good, but no substance.

Posted

I mean the handball call was absolutely spot on, can be no arguments. The rule has been in place since last season. Can’t score a goal directly after contact with the hand/arm.

Complain about the rule all you want cause I agree it’s stupid. But the decision was entirely correct

  • Administrator
Posted
6 minutes ago, Storts said:

I mean the handball call was absolutely spot on, can be no arguments. The rule has been in place since last season. Can’t score a goal directly after contact with the hand/arm.

Complain about the rule all you want cause I agree it’s stupid. But the decision was entirely correct

Of course.

The frustration for me is at the rule (which in the moment probably wasn't conveyed as so xD) not the decision. The officials had no choice to disallow it so any criticism directed towards them would be misguided.

Posted
1 hour ago, Steve Bruce Almighty said:

Fulham won't be winning for a while. Have to open up a good gap on them in the next 3 games we have. Failure to do so is inviting trouble.

Easiest 3 points in their next away game mate. 

  • The topic was unpinned

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...