Firstly, this doesn't make any sense. Secondly, if life is so much better now that we've left, what is there to be sanctimonious about?
No I wasn't crying for the fishing industry because I knew next to nothing about it, but I can admit that, unlike several prominent Brexiters, who spent the best part of a decade using fishing as one of their flagship Brexit winners but were nowhere to be seen when, less than a month after the transition period ended, fishermen from across the country drove their trucks to London to protest about all the wasted fish they were unable to sell because it's harder to export them to European buyers now. Now I actually think when things settle down and they've had time to adjust, the fishing industry might hopefully see some benefit from the Brexit deal, but it's not a great start.
In the meantime, a Brexit voter accusing someone else of using the fishing industry as a weapon might want to look a bit closer at the people who convinced him or her to vote for it in the first place.
I do buy into the view that people on both sides of the divide here need to stop relitigating the debate and scoring points against each other but you've shown from pretty early on with all of this talk of crying that you're not interested. I'm more than willing to have an intelligent debate on the pros and cons of being inside or outside the EU with people who voted to Leave.
However it remains true that some (far from all) people who voted for Brexit are more interested in the fact that they "won" than they are in being empathetic towards the people who have been hit by it and moving on to point out the reasons why overall/in the long term it will still be better for the UK.
Take Brexit out of it, responding "cry me a river" to people who are worried for their livelihoods and how they're going to put food on the table for their kids is just bang out of order really isn't it.