• Sign up free today!

    Join in on the discussion, prediction leagues and competitions today! Sign up takes no longer than 5 minutes.

Sign in to follow this  
Bluebird Hewitt

Igor Lebedev: 'Let's Turn Football Hooliganism into a Sport'

Recommended Posts

 

Quote

 

A Russian politician has proposed legalising football hooliganism and turning it into a sport.

 

Igor Lebedev has drawn up rules for "draka" - the Russian word for fight - which he said would involve 20 unarmed competitors on each side in an organised brawl.

 

Groups of Russia fans were deported from France after repeated scenes of violence at Euro 2016.

 

Russia will host the next World Cup in summer 2018.

 

Lebedev, who represents the opposition Liberal Democratic Party of Russia, is also on the board of the Russian Football Union.

 

He published the proposal on his party's website, stating: "Russia would be a pioneer in a new sport. Fans arrive, for example, and start picking fights. And they get the answer - challenge accepted. A meeting in a stadium at a set time.''

 

Following clashes between his country's fans and England supporters at Euro 2016, Lebedev said he "did not see anything terrible about fans fighting".

 

 

http://m.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/39172314

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

xD to be fair this was a common argument you used to hear for years in England, not to be a sport but that if two people want to fight they should be allowed to.

Unruly bunch of meatheads.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

are props supplied or is it a bring your own kind of thing?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We already watch and love 1 on 1 violence as a sport with many different varieties. I see no reason group combat should not be televised and glorified. Would mean we could all stop pretending we like rugby and get what we truly want.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If I'm being honest I don't mind hooliganism so long as it's contained and away from the stadium. If pond-life want to beat the shit out of each other then let them as it's only going to improve the gene-pool.

Once innocent people start to be affected the problem becomes totally un-acceptable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Cannabis said:

If I'm being honest I don't mind hooliganism so long as it's contained and away from the stadium. If pond-life want to beat the shit out of each other then let them as it's only going to improve the gene-pool.

That's all well and good until somebody gets killed and a witch hunt begins on who to blame.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm all for it as long as its organized in a place where it doesn't involve or disturbs other people and only bare fists are allowed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That it can be contained sounds nice in theory, but we do not know the wider social and psychological consequences. 

Once you legitimise anger based violence whose to say it won't lead to more violence outside of an organised car park meeting.

Boxing and UFC doesn't have any tribal aspects and the professionals have good discipline and rules usually. It's not like anyone can get into a ring either. But if any old mong can have a fight in a car park that's not the same.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/7/2017 at 0:52 PM, HoneyNUFC said:

That it can be contained sounds nice in theory, but we do not know the wider social and psychological consequences. 

Once you legitimise anger based violence whose to say it won't lead to more violence outside of an organised car park meeting.

Boxing and UFC doesn't have any tribal aspects and the professionals have good discipline and rules usually. It's not like anyone can get into a ring either. But if any old mong can have a fight in a car park that's not the same.

At smaller house shows it does cause a bit of violence from time to time as supporters of fighters tend to start football style chanting at one another. 

Personally if consenting adults  want to meet on brownfield sites and smash one another's heads in i'm all for it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You'd have to revoke their access to the NHS otherwise they are not just 2 consenting adults making a decision that only effects them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, HoneyNUFC said:

You'd have to revoke their access to the NHS otherwise they are not just 2 consenting adults making a decision that only effects them.

I'd be happy with that two. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Advertisement