Happy Blue Posted July 19, 2021 Posted July 19, 2021 Just now, Cicero said: Behave. Raiola will rinse Guardiola for everything City have. He hates the man. He can ask but we wont pay him that much wages this summer, this is why Sterling is sulking and not signing a new contract because we wont pay that much
Cicero Posted July 19, 2021 Author Posted July 19, 2021 13 minutes ago, Happy Blue said: He can ask but we wont pay him that much wages this summer, this is why Sterling is sulking and not signing a new contract because we wont pay that much He’s probably upset he isn’t getting any more under the table bonuses on top of his 300kpw.
Happy Blue Posted July 19, 2021 Posted July 19, 2021 1 minute ago, Cicero said: He’s probably upset he isn’t getting any more under the table bonuses on top of his 300kpw. Well, being a Chelsea fan you would know how these things work
Cicero Posted July 19, 2021 Author Posted July 19, 2021 9 minutes ago, Happy Blue said: Well, being a Chelsea fan you would know how these things work Aye because we’ve been blatantly caught cheating and we’re only saved because of the statute of limitations.
Happy Blue Posted July 19, 2021 Posted July 19, 2021 Just now, Cicero said: Aye because we’ve been blatantly caught cheating and we’re only saved because of the statute of limitations. You are owned by the Russian Mafia while City is a self funded club that makes more money than you, proven in court twice
DeadLinesman Posted July 19, 2021 Posted July 19, 2021 3 hours ago, Devil said: Some of the salaries for players that are known for City will be a total nonsense. Every man and his dog knows City lie about everything financial going at the club. I'd love to know the true salaries and transfer fee's you've paid to get players from clubs. This. Half their families are on about 100k a week as club cleaners and merchandising staff.
Dr. Gonzo Posted July 19, 2021 Posted July 19, 2021 2 hours ago, Cicero said: Aye because we’ve been blatantly caught cheating and we’re only saved because of the statute of limitations. At least when Chelsea got caught breaking rules (youth signing rules, wasn't it?)... they actually got punished and were banned from making transfers. Which actually may have helped them out in the long run... so idk if it actually punished them lol... but at least UEFA imposed some sort of penalty instead of somehow having a legal team fold when faced with the legal argument of "well we didn't cooperate with these investigations until the statute of limitations had run out... so now you can't do anything about it because enough time has passed." Because that essentially rewarded non-compliance.
Happy Blue Posted July 19, 2021 Posted July 19, 2021 23 minutes ago, DeadLinesman said: This. Half their families are on about 100k a week as club cleaners and merchandising staff. Absolute lies!! ..no way in hell are City giving out brand new £35,000 vehicles to the clubs traffic cone inspectors!
Happy Blue Posted July 19, 2021 Posted July 19, 2021 6 minutes ago, Dr. Gonzo said: At least when Chelsea got caught breaking rules (youth signing rules, wasn't it?)... they actually got punished and were banned from making transfers. That's because Chelsea are not rich enough to put UEFA in it's place
Cicero Posted July 19, 2021 Author Posted July 19, 2021 Strange how things work. No transfer ban + Covid we wouldn’t of had that legendary 2020 transfer window.
Subscriber JoshBRFC+ Posted July 20, 2021 Subscriber Posted July 20, 2021 18 hours ago, DeadLinesman said: When that fat parasitic cunt Raiola dies of a heart attack, the world will be a better place. Fuck me . Harsh but tough to argue against. The man is fucking poison.
Cicero Posted July 20, 2021 Author Posted July 20, 2021 21 hours ago, Happy Blue said: That's because Chelsea are not rich enough to put UEFA in it's place You lot just lost the appeal to restrain the premier league from looking at your emails. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/man-city-premier-league-appeal-21099069.amp
Happy Blue Posted July 20, 2021 Posted July 20, 2021 1 minute ago, Cicero said: You lot just lost the appeal to restrain the premier league from looking at your emails. You crazy as hell if you think they will find anything
Cicero Posted July 20, 2021 Author Posted July 20, 2021 1 minute ago, Happy Blue said: You crazy as hell if you think they will find anything A. Emails were already leaked. B. Why appeal to restrain them from looking?
Happy Blue Posted July 20, 2021 Posted July 20, 2021 Just now, Cicero said: A. Emails were already leaked. B. Why appeal to restrain them from looking? Privacy. let me look at your emails?
Cicero Posted July 20, 2021 Author Posted July 20, 2021 2 minutes ago, Happy Blue said: Privacy. let me look at your emails? No. Because I don’t want to self incriminate myself on a civil case where I was saved by the statue of limitations.
Happy Blue Posted July 20, 2021 Posted July 20, 2021 1 minute ago, Cicero said: No. Because I don’t want to self incriminate myself on a civil case where I was saved from the statue of limitations. I've seen some of the emails like this one "This might not be the right place, but i want to squirt my baby gravy all over your face yeaaahh!!! Open your mouth baby, here come the pearls!!" ..now i don't know what Txiki Begiristain's wife will make of this but it's clear why he didn't want it coming out that him and the board spend half the day on porn hub
Happy Blue Posted July 20, 2021 Posted July 20, 2021 The Chancellor also emphasised that City deny any wrongdoing and that the Premier League investigation is still at an early stage. He said that this weighed in favour of publication of details, and issued a rap on the knuckles to the League for its tardy prosecution of the matter. He said: “the club has been anxious to emphasise before us that ‘the arbitral proceedings relate to an ongoing and confidential investigatory and disciplinary process which is still in its early stages’, and that it may be that no charges will ever be brought against it. “While that may be true, it seems to me that this is, if anything, a factor which tells in favour of publication. “This is an investigation which commenced in December 2018. It is surprising, and a matter of legitimate public concern, that so little progress has been made after two and a half years
Subscriber CaaC (John)+ Posted August 23, 2021 Subscriber Posted August 23, 2021 Manchester United have been handed a boost in their pursuit of Borussia Dortmund striker Erling Braut Haaland, 21, whose £64m contract clause will become active in January. (Marca - in Spanish)
Happy Blue Posted August 23, 2021 Posted August 23, 2021 7 minutes ago, CaaC (John) said: Manchester United have been handed a boost in their pursuit of Borussia Dortmund striker Erling Braut Haaland, 21, whose £64m contract clause will become active in January. (Marca - in Spanish) he will only play for a team that can win a league, you chancers couldn't even beat Southampton ..City, Liverpool & Chelsea will finish above you this season tbf
Happy Blue Posted August 25, 2021 Posted August 25, 2021 Mino Raiola is demanding wages of €50m/year for Erling Håland, in addition to agents fees of €40m. Therefore Bayern have no chance of signing the Norwegian striker next year. Håland has a release clause of €75m for next year that can rise to €90m with bonuses [ @SPORTBILD ]
Devil-Dick Willie Posted August 25, 2021 Posted August 25, 2021 If I were Dortmund I'd have offloaded him this window already. Looked for a buyer in the 100 mil region and pulled the trigger. An extra 6 months is not worth the 40 mil they'll lose by selling him in 6 months
Happy Blue Posted August 25, 2021 Posted August 25, 2021 1 hour ago, Devil-Dick Willie said: If I were Dortmund I'd have offloaded him this window already. Looked for a buyer in the 100 mil region and pulled the trigger. An extra 6 months is not worth the 40 mil they'll lose by selling him in 6 months They probably could of got £140million from us this window, if them wage demands are true though i think we would pass ..maybe why he's waiting for the clause to activate to cover his wages with the reduced fee of 65million
Happy Blue Posted August 31, 2021 Posted August 31, 2021 Erling Haaland interview in Norway on international duty: Says he decided to be a footballer when he was young when he saw his dad play, and wanted to be bigger and better than him. The journalists jokingly asked "Do you not think you are a bigger star than Alfie already?" and Haaland quite seriously responded "He has 34 international caps, and over 200 games and a lot of goals in the best league in the world, there is a lot of work to get to that level yet" He definitely has his sights on the Premier League and hates united for crippling his dad (Keane) and growing up a City & Leeds supporter
Redcanuck Posted August 31, 2021 Posted August 31, 2021 2 hours ago, Happy Blue said: Erling Haaland interview in Norway on international duty: Says he decided to be a footballer when he was young when he saw his dad play, and wanted to be bigger and better than him. The journalists jokingly asked "Do you not think you are a bigger star than Alfie already?" and Haaland quite seriously responded "He has 34 international caps, and over 200 games and a lot of goals in the best league in the world, there is a lot of work to get to that level yet" He definitely has his sights on the Premier League and hates united for crippling his dad (Keane) and growing up a City & Leeds supporter Surely this myth has been completely debunked especially by Haarlands own words. I want to make it clear that it was not the knee that took a knock in the Manchester derby, despite what some papers have reported. It's my left knee that's been bothering me and it was clearly shown on Sky that it was my right knee that took the knock. It's been bothering me for three months. Also wasn't a lawsuit against Keane by City and Haarland for loss of income denied? Haaland finished that game (the incident happened in minute 86), played 45 minutes four days later for Norway in a friendly, then three more days later he did 68 minutes against West Ham. Not bad for a player whose career had been meant to end a week ago at Old Trafford. The following season Haaland retired aged just 30 following a few more games with City. He retired because of incessant injury woes with his left knee, something Roy Keane didn't influence whatsoever – the tackle went on Haaland's right leg. Can't see Haarland Jr hating United for the tackle when his father admits it didn't have anything to do with his early retirement.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.