Jump to content
talkfootball365
  • Welcome to talkfootball365!

    The better place to talk football.

Netherlands 0-0 France - Friday 21st June, 2024


Recommended Posts

Sign up to remove this ad.

Right decision to disallow the goal. He's definitely in the keeper's immediate eyeline which is gonna affect how the keeper reacts. Easy decision in my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Subscriber

My only hope is that English referees aren't invited to the next major tournament and that maybe then the penny will finally drop with PGMOL that they've got a problem.

Lol, who am I kidding 😅

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 6666 said:

Right decision to disallow the goal. He's definitely in the keeper's immediate eyeline which is gonna affect how the keeper reacts. Easy decision in my opinion.

Would be nice to know why they think he is impeding the keeper?  The keeper sees the shot, knows where the ball is going, because he moves in that direction.  i don't believe it's his eyeline which is impacted here.  Maybe they feel the Dutch attacker prevented the keeper from reaching the ball?  Highly subjective anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

View from behind the goal changed my mind. Initially thought the on-pitch ruling should stand, but when you see the distance of Maignan and Dumfries and speed of the shot, the goal should stand for me. If anything Maignan's own defenders are 'in his way' from blocking the sight of the shot. 

Harsh to disallow. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator
1 minute ago, Redcanuck said:

Maybe they feel the Dutch attacker prevented the keeper from reaching the ball? 

This is why I think they've disallowed it. 

 

The major problem here of VAR in general. Is that they look for reasons to disallow the goal. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If he had dived in that direction and Dumfries physically blocked him, of course give the offside.

But he didn't move at all, he was totally wrong-footed (not by Dumfries) and was never going to save it. In which case, its just a case of referees looking for a reason to interfere with the game.

Edited by Inverted
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator
11 minutes ago, Inverted said:

If he had dived in that direction and Dumfries physically blocked him, of course give the offside

Sadly that's not what the rules say :(

But the rules don't have common sense applied to then. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

football forum
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Sign up or subscribe to remove this ad.


×
×
  • Create New...