Administrator Stan Posted June 17, 2020 Author Administrator Posted June 17, 2020 Villa fortunate there the keeper didn't carry it into his own net.
Administrator Stan Posted June 17, 2020 Author Administrator Posted June 17, 2020 Wait how was that not allowed
Subscriber Mel81x+ Posted June 17, 2020 Subscriber Posted June 17, 2020 Just now, RandoEFC said: That was definitely in. How are they justifying not giving it as a goal?
Spike Posted June 17, 2020 Posted June 17, 2020 1 minute ago, Stan said: They didn't say. Literally just said they switched off. People are odd
West of West Ham Posted June 17, 2020 Posted June 17, 2020 That is why football needs a video review that’s transparent like in rugby.
Administrator Stan Posted June 17, 2020 Author Administrator Posted June 17, 2020 He and the ball are behind the post ffs
Administrator Stan Posted June 17, 2020 Author Administrator Posted June 17, 2020 1 minute ago, Cicero said: Is there not goal line tech!?? You only have to think the technology isn't working properly?!
Subscriber RandoEFC+ Posted June 17, 2020 Subscriber Posted June 17, 2020 that's a definite goal. My main takeaway there is that the goalkeeping is absolutely garbage but he makes up for it with a great poker face after.
Dr. Gonzo Posted June 17, 2020 Posted June 17, 2020 1 minute ago, Cicero said: Is there not goal line tech!?? The goal line tech failed, it looks like. No idea why VAR isn’t involved there, that’s a goal and we all saw that. The way VAR is implemented is why people take such issue with it, and this is why. Seems like the exact reason why VAR exists.
Cicero Posted June 17, 2020 Posted June 17, 2020 Just now, Stan said: You only have to think the technology isn't working properly?! Will they give it after review at half?
Administrator Stan Posted June 17, 2020 Author Administrator Posted June 17, 2020 Mad. Surprised VAR didn't get involved. For all the shit that's said about it, they could have got a lot of kudos for correcting that decision.
Subscriber Mel81x+ Posted June 17, 2020 Subscriber Posted June 17, 2020 I'll be very surprised if its not given. The referee kept pointing to his GLT watch and saying he didn't get anything and then replays show the goalkeeper is basically hugging the net behind the line with ball in hand. Weird just weird.
West of West Ham Posted June 17, 2020 Posted June 17, 2020 It’d be funny if we didn’t need the Blunts to win!
West of West Ham Posted June 17, 2020 Posted June 17, 2020 Just now, Mel81x said: I'll be very surprised if its not given. The referee kept pointing to his GLT watch and saying he didn't get anything and then replays show the goalkeeper is basically hugging the net behind the line with ball in hand. Weird just weird. It can’t be given retrospectively
Subscriber RandoEFC+ Posted June 17, 2020 Subscriber Posted June 17, 2020 Is VAR still being used? I thought there was some talk of them not using it for the rest of the season. Incredible that the one piece of technology that you knew you could trust now doesn't work either . Maybe they just turned the goal line buzzer off for the first game back in the hope that it would cause some scandal and get the Premier League/football trending early days.
Inverted Posted June 17, 2020 Posted June 17, 2020 So they've somehow managed to cock-up the most undeniable, objective piece of tech, for one of the most unambiguous rules in football. Finding new ways to surprise the world.
Subscriber Mel81x+ Posted June 17, 2020 Subscriber Posted June 17, 2020 2 minutes ago, West of West Ham said: It can’t be given retrospectively Even if the tech to aid the decision fails? I'd hope theres something in the rules about that.
Subscriber Dan+ Posted June 17, 2020 Subscriber Posted June 17, 2020 Sheffield United shouldn't even bother playing the second half.
Inverted Posted June 17, 2020 Posted June 17, 2020 1 minute ago, Mel81x said: Even if the tech to aid the decision fails? I'd hope theres something in the rules about that. It's supposed to be 100% fail-proof so I doubt they've got any plan for when it doesn't work.
Subscriber RandoEFC+ Posted June 17, 2020 Subscriber Posted June 17, 2020 How does the linesman not intervene regardless of the technology? The keeper was so far behind the line with the ball that he was almost coming back round the other side of the post.
West of West Ham Posted June 17, 2020 Posted June 17, 2020 6 minutes ago, Mel81x said: Even if the tech to aid the decision fails? I'd hope theres something in the rules about that. Yup. You’ll hear a cliche that these decisions even themselves over the course of a season. They don’t. truth is, technology has caused more controversy than before it and I don’t know about anyone else, but I’d get rid and leave the decisions to the ref. Was strangely always part of the fun either enjoying a dodgy decision going your way, or having the piss taken out of you when against in the pub with your mates.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.