Subscriber Mel81x+ Posted October 8, 2020 Subscriber Share Posted October 8, 2020 Saw this on Twitter today and figured it might make for good discussion. I can't really see why something automatically becomes an advantage because its the dying minutes of a game? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cicero Posted October 8, 2020 Share Posted October 8, 2020 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrator Stan Posted October 8, 2020 Administrator Share Posted October 8, 2020 Literally no need to change the throw ins. If it ain't broke... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subscriber Mel81x+ Posted October 8, 2020 Author Subscriber Share Posted October 8, 2020 5 minutes ago, Stan said: Literally no need to change the throw ins. If it ain't broke... Don't let Arsene fix it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smiley Culture Posted October 8, 2020 Share Posted October 8, 2020 Pretty sure it was trialled in non-league football in the 90’s and it never went anywhere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Gonzo Posted October 8, 2020 Share Posted October 8, 2020 Kick-ins instead of throw ins seems like it won't make much of a difference to me. Seems like an unnecessary rule change. If they want to take a look at handballs and the offside rule... I think there's some work that could be done there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subscriber Pyfish+ Posted October 9, 2020 Subscriber Share Posted October 9, 2020 Absolutely no need to mess with throw ins. Changes for changes sake makes no sense! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeadLinesman Posted October 9, 2020 Share Posted October 9, 2020 If a player is taking a free kick, it’s still 9vs10........ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smiley Culture Posted October 9, 2020 Share Posted October 9, 2020 Kick-ins would surely just see players absolutely leathering the ball towards the box from pretty much anywhere on the pitch, outside of the penalty area they’re defending. How shit would that be? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subscriber Mel81x+ Posted October 9, 2020 Author Subscriber Share Posted October 9, 2020 I don't think anything they are discussing would ever truly come to fruition unless it can be proven to be fair. That said, they seem to be wanting to give the advantage to the losing team which makes zero sense to me. You've got 90 minutes to prove that you can win a match and skewing favor just because its the last few minutes seems to be the complete opposite of fair to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burning Gold Posted October 9, 2020 Share Posted October 9, 2020 Arsene's really doing a number on his Le Profeseur reputation since retiring isn't he. Remember the shit idea he had about offsides a while back? The idea of taking a free-kick to yourself intrigues me though. Can see it working a bit like in rugby where someone's fouled and quickly taps the ball and runs through three or four defenders who can't touch him as they're all too close to the free kick. Should mean less shitty cynical fouls in the middle of the pitch... or just more players kicking the ball away after a foul Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subscriber CaaC (John)+ Posted October 16, 2020 Subscriber Share Posted October 16, 2020 Not sure if this is in the right forum so move or merge if you must but I am interested in all your opinions on the title of the thread, is it a good idea to scrap the throw-ins and replace it with a kick in? I didn't put a poll in as I think talk is better than a Yes or No, he said... The legendary Gunners boss, who moulded their 'Invincibles' of 2004, cites a disadvantage to the attacking team late in the game as a reason for introducing kick-ins. 'I would like to change the throw-in rule: five minutes before the end, a throw-in for you should be an advantage, but in these situations, you are facing 10 outfield players in play, whilst you only have nine,' Wenger told L'Equipe. Well, I am no experts like you lot as you watch the games more than I do but I think a kick in instead of a throw from start to finish but this is my opinion only and others may differ. Arsene Wenger wants to replace throw-ins with 'KICK-ins' as former Arsenal boss plans to radically freshen up the game in his new role at FIFA... including controversial changes to offside, corner and free-kick rules Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Artful Dodger Posted October 16, 2020 Share Posted October 16, 2020 Stupid idea, just designed to benefit sides that play like he wants to play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azeem Posted October 16, 2020 Share Posted October 16, 2020 Ronaldo taking a kick in Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smiley Culture Posted October 16, 2020 Share Posted October 16, 2020 11 minutes ago, The Artful Dodger said: Stupid idea, just designed to benefit sides that play like he wants to play. What? Shit? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subscriber CaaC (John)+ Posted March 5, 2021 Subscriber Share Posted March 5, 2021 Not sure if this thread is in the right place so the Admin/Mods can move/merge if they must. Quote Accidental handball that leads to a goal-scoring chance or a goal for a team-mate will no longer be penalised, say football's lawmakers. Ifab confirmed the change on Friday, saying it was because of the "interpretation of handball incidents" not being applied consistently. Fulham lost to Tottenham as Josh Maja was denied a goal as Davinson Sanchez's clearance flew into Mario Lemina's arm. The change is likely to be introduced in England from 1 July. It will remain a handball offence if a player scores accidentally with their hand or arm, or uses their hand or arm directly before scoring. The International Football Association Board had tightened handball laws for the start of the 2020-21 season. However, a spate of handball decisions led to fierce criticism across the game and saw English top-flight referees ordered to be less strict about their interpretations of the law. Premier League officials were told to particularly focus on the distance an offending player is from the ball and whether he has extended his arm outside the natural body line. In a statement, Ifab also clarified its interpretation of the offside law, saying the definition for handball, whereby the arm ends at the bottom of the armpit, must be used when judging whether a player is offside or not. Chelsea's Timo Werner was denied a goal against Liverpool on Thursday night when VAR ruled the position of his arm made him offside in the build-up. https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/56291850 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.