Administrator Stan Posted October 15, 2020 Administrator Posted October 15, 2020 Hopefully they can do something about the PPV thing but I'm not holding my breath (not against them, but the PL).
Dr. Gonzo Posted October 15, 2020 Posted October 15, 2020 Surely Rick Parry’s position is untenable now
Dr. Gonzo Posted October 15, 2020 Posted October 15, 2020 47 minutes ago, Stan said: Hopefully they can do something about the PPV thing but I'm not holding my breath (not against them, but the PL). The cynic in me thinks that this “plank was just to deflect from the PPV thing and float something that would be more unpopular than PPV to reject. And now they can say “well PPV isn’t great, but we avoided that Project Power Grab!” But I also know Rick Parry does take half developed ideas too seriously, so there’s that too.
Smiley Culture Posted October 15, 2020 Posted October 15, 2020 3 hours ago, Dr. Gonzo said: Surely Rick Parry’s position is untenable now Why? The majority of EFL sides, it seems, backed it and he went with it after their meetings. It’s not as though he’s gone against the majority here.
Dr. Gonzo Posted October 15, 2020 Posted October 15, 2020 26 minutes ago, Smiley Culture said: Why? The majority of EFL sides, it seems, backed it and he went with it after their meetings. It’s not as though he’s gone against the majority here. I was thinking because he was the one who wanted to put his name over this plan that it seems like most people hate. But yeah you’re right that the people he’s mostly representing were in favour of it. Also I’ve got my own views of him from the time he was a very shit executive with us, so I don’t exactly think he’s the most competent or anything.
Smiley Culture Posted October 15, 2020 Posted October 15, 2020 35 minutes ago, Dr. Gonzo said: I was thinking because he was the one who wanted to put his name over this plan that it seems like most people hate. But yeah you’re right that the people he’s mostly representing were in favour of it. Also I’ve got my own views of him from the time he was a very shit executive with us, so I don’t exactly think he’s the most competent or anything. The people who were so against it outside of the Premier League was fans of EFL clubs, the chairmen were willing to become Turkey’s voting for Christmas for a quick buck. He’s been woeful in his job so should be sacked for that, rather than anything to do with PBP.
Administrator Stan Posted October 15, 2020 Administrator Posted October 15, 2020 EFL have rejected the PL's COVID rescue package.
Dr. Gonzo Posted October 15, 2020 Posted October 15, 2020 2 hours ago, Smiley Culture said: He’s been woeful in his job so should be sacked for that Sounds familiar 15 minutes ago, Stan said: EFL have rejected the PL's COVID rescue package. Probably because Championship clubs were a bit excluded, tbh.
ScoRoss Posted October 15, 2020 Author Posted October 15, 2020 Gary Neville, David Bernstein and David Davies proposing a 'Manifesto for Change'.
Subscriber Dan+ Posted October 15, 2020 Subscriber Posted October 15, 2020 9 hours ago, Smiley Culture said: I wonder what English Football’s worst idea is. - The Power Grab. - “Game 39”. - B teams in the EFL. - £15 to watch games. All within a week of each other. Football's come out of the pandemic looking every bit as grotesque as any cynic could've said beforehand.
Bluewolf Posted October 15, 2020 Posted October 15, 2020 Pleased it's been kicked into touch... They do need change that's for sure but having majority control in the hands of a few elite dictating to others we can well do without...
Dave Posted October 20, 2020 Posted October 20, 2020 Seems like Project Big Picture was a half hearted "we tried" measure to Uefa. I'm in favour of it to be honest. United have been irrelevant since Fergie. Arsenal have been irrelevant since 2004. Chelsea have been relevant since 2003. City have been relevant since 2009 Liverpool have won the league once in 30 years. Spurs haven't won a league since the year lol. They're not as integral to English football as they think. Let them play in the States, China, Dubai. It will make domestic football far more interesting.
LFCMike Posted October 20, 2020 Posted October 20, 2020 27 minutes ago, The Palace Fan said: Seems like Project Big Picture was a half hearted "we tried" measure to Uefa. I'm in favour of it to be honest. United have been irrelevant since Fergie. Arsenal have been irrelevant since 2004. Chelsea have been relevant since 2003. City have been relevant since 2009 Liverpool have won the league once in 30 years. Spurs haven't won a league since the year lol. They're not as integral to English football as they think. Let them play in the States, China, Dubai. It will make domestic football far more interesting. Is this not a Champions League replacement? It sounds really shit either way
Smiley Culture Posted October 20, 2020 Posted October 20, 2020 8 minutes ago, LFCMike said: Is this not a Champions League replacement? It sounds really shit either way Yeah. Sounds like it, anyway. I reckon, from that link, it would be 3x6’s with 5H&A games, meaning the greedy bastards get an extra four group games than they would in the Champions League and then there would be a pot of money for the winner. Shame they’re not all going completely.
Subscriber RandoEFC+ Posted October 20, 2020 Subscriber Posted October 20, 2020 This is starting to feel like a significant period of time in where football is going. The Liverpool owners in particular seem to be making some sort of power play. It's anyone's guess what their endgame is but turning the club and the rest of the 'big six' into a worldwide franchise seems like it won't turn out to be far from the mark. I never thought that Big Picture would succeed but maybe it really was just a token gesture so that they could suggest (weakly) that they tried to work with English football and were turned down. If they succeed with what they seem to want to do it would be a bigger travesty for Liverpool fans than anyone else seeing a traditional socialist club abducted by the most capitalist move football has seen in my lifetime, possibly ever. Don't get me wrong though, I'm sure the money men at the rest of the 'big' clubs are licking their lips at the prospect of some of this stuff and delighted that the opportunity could arise without them having to take the PR hit of putting the proposals forward themselves. I'm not in agreement with Aaron and Smiley - I don't believe that losing those six clubs would be better for English football.
Dave Posted October 20, 2020 Posted October 20, 2020 23 minutes ago, LFCMike said: Is this not a Champions League replacement? It sounds really shit either way I read it as a step towards a super league but that may be a judgemental interpretation.
The Artful Dodger Posted October 20, 2020 Posted October 20, 2020 I knew this virus would be the cover they needed to expedite some sort of break away or power grab. It would be terrible for the game if this happens, but its too late to save it now. Main problem is too much footy on the telly. Should be 1, max 2 games a weekend shown live.
Dr. Gonzo Posted October 20, 2020 Posted October 20, 2020 A super league is a good way to kill my interest in football forever
Burning Gold Posted October 20, 2020 Posted October 20, 2020 Project Big Picture makes sense now. They were never going to get the "other" clubs to give away both power and money; it was just such an unattractive prospect there had to be more to it. I don't hate this idea for a "super league" that's essentially just an extension of the Champions League rather than a replacement for domestic leagues for the top clubs. It would likely mean they stop competing in the League Cup, which I think would be a massive shame, but it feels like that's been inevitable for some time now. What's not acceptable to me is the implication that it'll be a closed shop. That basically kills any sense of competition and equality between clubs. I know there's a strong argument that hasn't existed in practice for a long time, but it's always been theoretically possible for any team to reach the top without relying on external organisations. That's been a pretty fundamental concept for football in this country and many others in Europe since essentially their inception (with notable exceptions).
MUFC Posted October 20, 2020 Posted October 20, 2020 If this does happen I would welcome all the teams that want to take part to happily leave the premier League. And when it fails happily see them start from the bottom of the pyramid when they want to come back to English football.
MUFC Posted October 20, 2020 Posted October 20, 2020 If this does happen I would welcome all the teams that want to take part to happily leave the premier League. And when it fails happily see them start from the bottom of the pyramid when they want to come back to English football.
Smiley Culture Posted October 20, 2020 Posted October 20, 2020 I can only see these big clubs fucking off and making their own cup competition, I can’t see them forming like a 20 team league, ala the Premier League. Can you imagine any of these clubs being happy with the possibility of finishing 18th out of 20 in the European Super League? They won’t like that. They’ll just snatch the power from UEFA and have their own tournament, I think. It’s still immoral and wrong when you’ve got Arsenal finishing in 8th and being in this yet teams winning their national league and not being rewarded with a place in the elite European competition.
The Artful Dodger Posted October 20, 2020 Posted October 20, 2020 Funny how much Liverpool owners and Manchester United owners buzz off each other. I’m all for mutual respect but this lot seem to be bosom buddies.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.