True Blue 689 Posted March 9, 2017 I am going to start watching it tomorrow after work, so please use spoilers plenty of people highly recommend it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Harvsky 2,386 Posted March 9, 2017 It is very good but I thought the 4th season dragged in places. The historical inaccuracies bugged me a little but I got over it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
True Blue 689 Posted March 9, 2017 Just now, HoneyNUFC said: It is very good but I thought the 4th season dragged in places. The historical inaccuracies bugged me a little but I got over it. I though the series went on with historical accuracy? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Harvsky 2,386 Posted March 9, 2017 1 minute ago, True Blue said: I though the series went on with historical accuracy? As the series goes on the timeframe and placing of characters becomes wildly inaccurate if not entirely made up. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
True Blue 689 Posted March 9, 2017 Just now, HoneyNUFC said: As the series goes on the timeframe and placing of characters becomes wildly inaccurate if not entirely made up. Oh well i guess they had to make it made up to become more interesting. I will still give it a go Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ASF 208 Posted March 12, 2017 I'm going to start watching it today. Hope it's worth it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cocaine 3 Posted March 12, 2017 Superb series. Travis Fimmel as Ragnar Lothbrok was a brilliant piece of acting. *Spoiler coming...* Not sure how good it will be going forward without him (I know it had to come some time) - we'll see... but IF Lagertha stays in it then it will be worth watching still! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
6666 735 Posted March 12, 2017 I think it's best to not go into it expecting historical accuracy. Just treat it as any other TV show and it'll be enjoyable. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Harry 870 Posted March 13, 2017 On 10/03/2017 at 1:31 AM, True Blue said: Oh well i guess they had to make it made up to become more interesting. I will still give it a go And to keep key characters alive, and keep the plot line manageable. To be fair It's still true enough to history that you can easily spoil the main pays of it for yourself by reading up on viking history. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ASF 208 Posted March 20, 2017 This show is great. 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
True Blue 689 Posted December 5, 2017 The first two episodes of season five were merely an introduction for bigger things. The show looks like they increased their budget as it is fairly popular now. Can't wait for Thursday (in Bosnia) for the new episode to premiere. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Viva la FCB 661 Posted December 19, 2017 So im up to date but heres my thoughts so far: The show isnt the same without Ragnar and Athelstan (to a lesser degree). They where the two strongest and most interesting characters. With Ragnar alive they could keep the most important parts of Athelstan alive because he partly lived through Ragnar. With both gone the only hope was really Bjorn. I think Bjorn could have taken the mantle but with him seemingly intent on raiding the other side of the world hes merely a background character. Its a pity, focusing on Ivar isnt the same. I really dont care about him, ok hes this evil death wielding cripple mastermind destined for great things. I just dont care, he doesnt have the depths to him that Ragnar had nor even Bjorn to some extent. It leaves me watching somewhat disinterested, even on the Lagertha front i dont care either what happens. Dont get me wrong ill keep watching, but they have focused on the wrong character since Ragnars story has passed. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
6666 735 Posted December 31, 2017 Ivar, you amazingly insane cunt. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Spike 1,828 Posted December 31, 2017 I don't think I could handle this show's depiction of history without losing a few marbles. Everyone knows Viking's were vicious mauraders in bright colours that were obsessed with hair perfumes and primping their hair. They were concerned with cleanliness and had retarded hairstyles that were shaved at the back and long at the front. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Harvsky 2,386 Posted January 1, 2018 Genetically they were also short stumpy men, not the 6ft 3 blonde Hitler fantasy 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
True Blue 689 Posted February 24, 2018 Looking forward to the next part of the fifth season, but it will be no sooner than the end of the year Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Viva la FCB 661 Posted March 27, 2018 Well what did you guys think about the first half? Im a little underwhelmed. I did like the finale mind you. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
True Blue 689 Posted March 27, 2018 Finale was decent, however not as keen on it as when Ragnar ruled. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Devil-Dick Willie 1,046 Posted May 14, 2018 Watching the first season. Never new the vikings had a culture of being wife sharing cucks. Also I choose to believe Ragnar and his male model friends secretly want to sail to milan for the fashion shows. With haircuts and fashion like theirs. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
True Blue 689 Posted November 27, 2018 Viking return tomorrow, can't wait. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
