Guest Posted June 16, 2018 Posted June 16, 2018 Just now, The Artful Dodger said: No, because you think that winning the ball is a penalty. I didn't even know you were American, it all makes sense now. Just because you won the ball, doesn't mean its not a foul.
Administrator Stan Posted June 16, 2018 Author Administrator Posted June 16, 2018 Just now, Blue said: I agree. I hate VAR and it needs to be eliminated as soon as possible, but if it wants to be effective it has to get the decisions right. That was a correct decision as Trent I think it was didn't put his leg down and sandwiched Mbappe, making it impossible to keep going. Its carelessness and unfortunately, that's no excuse. It was Risdon on Griezmann.
Eco Posted June 16, 2018 Posted June 16, 2018 Just now, The Artful Dodger said: No, because you think that winning the ball is a penalty. I didn't even know you were American, it all makes sense now. Not what i said though, I said I don't think he touched it. The replays on Fox don't show him touching the ball. But if he had touched it, you can't left your left and trip up the attacker. I think you are the one that needs to learn the rules, mate.
Rick Posted June 16, 2018 Posted June 16, 2018 Clearly some people on here don't know football because the general rule is the ball has to change direction for it NOT to be given a penalty. You lot wouldn't be saying "No pen" if it was just a random game in the league. I mean, come the fuck on, he does fuck all to take the ball away then clips his legs with the follow through. Clear penalty.
6666 Posted June 16, 2018 Posted June 16, 2018 People against VAR are morons. As proven by Mark Lawrensen on commentary who's having a breakdown.
Eco Posted June 16, 2018 Posted June 16, 2018 1 minute ago, Blue said: Just because you won the ball, doesn't mean its not a foul. This.
Danny Posted June 16, 2018 Posted June 16, 2018 7 minutes ago, Mantis Toboggan M.D. said: That's definitely a penalty. He got the slightest of touches on the ball if at all, then takes down Griezman. If he touches the ball first it's not a penalty
Spike Posted June 16, 2018 Posted June 16, 2018 Just watch by the next world cup every foul will be video reviewed and it will be like watching rugby; they will have to introduce clock freezing so they games doesnt have 45 minutes injury time each half
Rick Posted June 16, 2018 Posted June 16, 2018 But he didn't win the ball did he, the ball continued in the direction griezman was running with it before the tackle.
The Artful Dodger Posted June 16, 2018 Posted June 16, 2018 1 minute ago, Mantis Toboggan M.D. said: Clearly some people on here don't know football because the general rule is the ball has to change direction for it NOT to be given a penalty. You lot wouldn't be saying "No pen" if it was just a random game in the league. I mean, come the fuck on, he does fuck all to take the ball away then clips his legs with the follow through. Clear penalty. Load of rubbish. The rule is that a tackle has to win the ball, as in take it out of control of the player with the ball, which he clearly does. Griezzman had no way of getting to that, it was a great tackle and not a penalty.
Administrator Batard Posted June 16, 2018 Administrator Posted June 16, 2018 This is embarrassing. Change the fucking system already
Spike Posted June 16, 2018 Posted June 16, 2018 I would have no issue if he didn't waive away the penalty and change his mind over a minute later. If it went straight to VAR, I'd be okay.
Rick Posted June 16, 2018 Posted June 16, 2018 If it were some Tunisian on Harry Kane on Monday night, I bet there wouldn't be any of this. It's only cause it's the "froggy cunts" versus the underdog that you's are arsed.
The Artful Dodger Posted June 16, 2018 Posted June 16, 2018 3 minutes ago, Blue said: Just because you won the ball, doesn't mean its not a foul. In these circumstances it's clearly not a foul, he wins the ball and takes it out of Griezzman's posession. He was not getting to that ball.
Eco Posted June 16, 2018 Posted June 16, 2018 1 minute ago, The Artful Dodger said: Load of rubbish. The rule is that a tackle has to win the ball, as in take it out of control of the player with the ball, which he clearly does. Griezzman had no way of getting to that, it was a great tackle and not a penalty. I think want warrants it a penalty was the defender lifting his leg, thus tripping up the attacker. No lifting of the leg, no penalty.
Administrator Stan Posted June 16, 2018 Author Administrator Posted June 16, 2018 Just now, Mantis Toboggan M.D. said: If it were some Tunisian on Harry Kane on Monday night, I bet there wouldn't be any of this. It's only cause it's the "froggy cunts" versus the underdog that you's are arsed. or maybe we're all arsed because we don't want bad decisions to influence a game
Spike Posted June 16, 2018 Posted June 16, 2018 Just now, Mantis Toboggan M.D. said: If it were some Tunisian on Harry Kane on Monday night, I bet there wouldn't be any of this. It's only cause it's the "froggy cunts" versus the underdog that you's are arsed. No.
DeadLinesman Posted June 16, 2018 Posted June 16, 2018 Several people saying ‘just because you won the ball doesn’t mean it’s not a foul’. Crazy I know, but just because you make contact doesn’t mean it’s a penalty.........
Guest Posted June 16, 2018 Posted June 16, 2018 3 minutes ago, The Artful Dodger said: In these circumstances it's clearly not a foul, he wins the ball and takes it out of Griezzman's posession. He was not getting to that ball. And then goes on to sandwich Griezmann's legs and literally clips him. Griezmann had no chance of continuing. If he had just won the ball then fair enough, but he did more than that.
Administrator Stan Posted June 16, 2018 Author Administrator Posted June 16, 2018 Just now, Eco said: I think want warrants it a penalty was the defender lifting his leg, thus tripping up the attacker. No lifting of the leg, no penalty. I think the lift of the leg came after the contact, not as a way to bring Griezmann down. Wins the ball Gets out of Griezmann's control Momentum of the sliding tackle means he traps Griezmann's leg but this is unintentional. Either way, the ball is already with the keeper because of the slight contact on the ball in the first place. I don't think it should have been a penalty/don't think the decision should have been overturned as it wasn't a clear and obvious error, for me anyways.
DeadLinesman Posted June 16, 2018 Posted June 16, 2018 2 minutes ago, Mantis Toboggan M.D. said: If it were some Tunisian on Harry Kane on Monday night, I bet there wouldn't be any of this. It's only cause it's the "froggy cunts" versus the underdog that you's are arsed. It’s called an opinion mate, and like arseholes, we’ve all got them.
Guest Posted June 16, 2018 Posted June 16, 2018 Just now, Mantis Toboggan M.D. said: Why do you keep saying Mbappe? 😂 Christ, and then I went on to say Griezmann in that same post. Its 6 AM here, dont @ me
Eco Posted June 16, 2018 Posted June 16, 2018 1 minute ago, Stan said: I think the lift of the leg came after the contact, not as a way to bring Griezmann down. Wins the ball Gets out of Griezmann's control Momentum of the sliding tackle means he traps Griezmann's leg but this is unintentional. Either way, the ball is already with the keeper because of the slight contact on the ball in the first place. I don't think it should have been a penalty/don't think the decision should have been overturned as it wasn't a clear and obvious error, for me anyways. I'll watch it again, but I didn't think he touched the ball of the replays I was watching. IF he does though, I thought he immediately lifted his leg, stopping the attacker.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.